May 2006

The Twisted Web Of Hastert

Posted 5/25/06 at 3:12pm by jamie

This story is so back and forth. First it starts off with ABC's Brian Ross reporting this:

Federal officials say the Congressional bribery investigation now includes Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, based on information from convicted lobbyists who are now cooperating with the government.

Part of the investigation involves a letter Hastert wrote three years ago, urging the Secretary of the Interior to block a casino on an Indian reservation that would have competed with other tribes.

The other tribes were represented by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff who reportedly has provided details of his dealings with Hastert as part of his plea agreement with the government.

This is nothing really new. There has been talk of Hastert being involved for months now, all this does is give us a little verification which is good.

Well this story comes out and shockingly enough the Justice Department issues an immediate denial:

The Justice Department denied a news report Wednesday that it was investigating House Speaker Dennis Hastert.

The statement by department spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos came in response to a report by ABC News that Hastert was under investigation by the FBI to determine his role in a public corruption probe centered around convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Amid a furor surrounding the weekend FBI raid on the offices of Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., ABC quoted federal officials as saying information implicating Hastert was developed from convicted lobbyists now cooperating with the government.

What is shocking about this is the speed in which the Justice Department responded. It is also shocking that they responded at all. We have heard different names come and go as being investigated with Abramoff, Cunningham and even Fitzgerald. In the past none of these reports have been confirmed nor denied by the Justice Department.

So why has the Justice Department decided to break its silence regarding on going investigations? Perhaps the answer lies with the heat Hastert has been putting on them regarding the William Jefferson raid this past weekend:

"The Justice Department must immediately return the papers it unconstitutionally seized," House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said in a statement.

Greenwald Responds

Posted 5/25/06 at 2:37pm by jamie

By now I am sure most of you have read about Delay thinking Stephen Colbert is actually some right-wing journalist, even though his show is obvious satire and appears on Comedy Central. If you are in the dark on this then check out Think Progress.

Now Bob Greenwald has responded:

Life as I have known it is coming to an end.

How will I ever recover from the harsh sting of a bad review from Tommy boy? According to a recent fundraising effort by Delayites, I "crashed and burned" on Colbert. Clearly, this is tragedy -- Shakespearean in its implications and Chekhovian in its impact.

AND -- now the money addict is using my appearance on Colbert to fundraise. That is either the highest compliment possible, or the lowest blow.

So, see the movie made by Mark Birnbaum and Jim Schermbeck, The Big Buy: Tom DeLay's Stolen Congress, and then decide if Tommy really should be using this film to fundraise. Or better yet -- subpoena the film for his trial, as his lawyer is saying the DeLay team may do!!! What to do in a world turned this upside down? Celebrate Clean Money Day, a day dedicated to the memory of Tom. Go to a house party and work like hell so that some of DeLay's corrupt cronies are thrown out of office this November. In the meantime I will retreat to fathom the meaning of "crash and burn" on Colbert...

Bob did a great response but I am worried about it. Delay has proven that when we deal with him we are dealing with an entirely new level of idiots. They might take what Greenwald said in this post and believe that he is conceding in this. True that might add a little more fun to this very interesting story.

Released footage of Pentagon leaves more questions than answers

Posted 5/25/06 at 12:56am by Anonymous (not verified)

     It's been five years since terrorism grappled America, spurring a seeming endless trail of hampered freedoms.  Even now, to this day, the Bush regime continues it's role in murky dealings.  The legislative nightmares and fumbled policies may pale in comparison to the attacks of September 11th, 2001 and for good reason.

     On May 16th, 2005 footage was finally released officially by the Department of Defense via Freedom of Information Act.  The captures entail one frame of a thin, white protrusion entering from the right side.  The next frame captures a silver-white explosion, followed by a fireball and trailing smoke.  For your convenience, Intoxination provides you with that video:

http://www.intoxination.net/2006/05/16/911-pentagon-video-1/

http://www.intoxination.net/2006/05/16/911-pentagon-video-2/

The WaPo Is Creepy

Posted 5/24/06 at 9:39pm by jamie

On April 18, 2005, the Washington Post did a write up about Rick Santorum entitled "Father First, Senator Second". This story was really creepy as it talked about Santorum bringing the dead fetus home from his wife's miscarriage and treating it as part of the family. You can read more about it in my post titled The Creepy Side of Santorum from last July or read the entire article here.

13 months later and the Washington Post does not cease to amaze. They published an article today entitled "Bill Frist: A Doctor at Heart". Again they show us how creepy these Republicans are. Instead of going into details, I urge you to either read the article or check out the great synopsis Aravosis did on it. Both of these articles are about the creepiest thing that could have ever been published in a newspaper.

Refusing To Address The Real Problem Of Immigration

Posted 5/24/06 at 2:28pm by jamie

The problem with illegal immigration is the employers. These people exploit the conditions in which these people are here and use those reasons for their own profit. If employers didn't higher illegal immigrants then we would not have illegal immigrants. So how is Senate addressing this situation? They are going to fine the employers.

Now some people might think that is a great move, but wait. The Republican legislation slated to pass Senate would make the fines a mere $20,000 dollars. Let's look at what that will do.

You own a farm. You hire 5 illegal aliens to work for $3.15 an hour. If you gave that work to documented workers and had to pay minimum wage it would cost you $2.00 an hour more. That means for every hour of work out of those five immigrants you save $10.00 ($2.00/hr X 5 illegal immigrants). Now if you work these guys 40 hours a week for 1 year you would save $20,800 dollars. Already you are making a savings over what the maximum fine would be.

Finding people to work for the joke we call minimum wage is hard. Say you would have to pay American workers $7.15 an hour. Now if you work those illegal immigrants for one year and get caught, you have still saved yourself over $20,000 after the fine.

This is the same problem that we have with the environment. Current EPA standards limit the fining at $50,000. If you have a company who is doing illegal dumping or deep well injecting of toxins into an oil well, they save over a million a year. That $50,000 is a nice little cost of doing business and it is not guaranteed you are going to get caught.

Dodging Bush

Posted 5/23/06 at 3:38pm by jamie

What is ironic is how Republicans talk about backing Bush 100% until it comes to their re-election chances (From today's Wall Street Journal):

President Bush goes to Pennsylvania tomorrow to campaign for embattled Republican House members in the Philadelphia suburbs. But one of the candidates isn't expected to be there.

Mr. Bush "is really doing poorly in our state," says Rep. Curt Weldon, explaining why he won't be on hand and hasn't asked for the president's help. "I've got to win this by myself."

Well, almost. Mr. Weldon did invite Arizona Sen. John McCain to his district last month to help him campaign and raise money, and he is thinking about doing it again.

It isn't easy leading your party to victory when a lot of people aren't eager to follow. With Mr. Bush's job-approval ratings skidding as low as 30% in national polls, more Republican candidates face risks in associating closely with him. That is forcing the White House and Republican advisers to improvise a strategy for success.

Now what these politicians fail to realize is that Bush is down in the polls for a reason - he does not operate as the American people want. If these Republicans want to still support Bush while avoiding him on the campaign trail then they are nothing but hypocrites. For A Republican to be totally clear of Bush, they must come out and publicly say they do not support what he is doing to our country - PERIOD.

Kudos To Congress

Posted 5/23/06 at 1:52pm by jamie

Karma

(This is Karma, my new kitten. She is a three month old bobbed-tail)

Finally Congress is working on some decent legislation:

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A television shot of a little boy losing his dog during Katrina rescue operations was the catalyst for the House to pass legislation Monday that would require pets to be considered in emergency-preparedness plans.

"The dog was taken away from this little boy, and to watch his face was a singularly revealing and tragic experience," said Rep. Tom Lantos, a California Democrat and sponsor of the Pet Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act. "This legislation was born at that moment."

The bill, which passed 349-24, would require state and local preparedness offices to take into account pet owners, household pets and service animals when drawing up evacuation plans.

Offices that fail to do so would not qualify for grants from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

I could not even begin to think of how these people felt being taken from their homes while their pets are left to suffer. So many people do not understand that pets are family members to a majority of Americans. This is even more so with seniors who have turned to a furry companion to fill that empty void by the loss of a spouse or loved one.

I have to compliment Congress and working on this bill and the House for passing it. It is nice to see something make its way through that isn't dedicated to helping out the corporations.

Jefferson Raid Raising Big Questions

Posted 5/23/06 at 3:43am by jamie

Here is a story that really makes you wonder:

An unusual FBI raid of a Democratic congressman's office over the weekend prompted complaints yesterday from leaders in both parties, who said the tactic was unduly aggressive and may have breached the constitutional separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government.

Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), who is at the center of a 14-month investigation for allegedly accepting bribes for promoting business ventures in Africa, also held a news conference in which he denied any wrongdoing and denounced the raid on his office as an "outrageous intrusion." Jefferson, who has not been charged with a crime, vowed to seek reelection in November.

"There are two sides to every story; there are certainly two sides to this story," Jefferson said at a Capitol Hill news conference. "There will be an appropriate time and forum when that can be explained."

The Saturday raid of Jefferson's quarters in the Rayburn House Office Building posed a new political dilemma for the leaders of both parties, who felt compelled to protest his treatment while condemning any wrongdoing by the lawmaker. The dilemma was complicated by new details contained in an 83-page affidavit unsealed on Sunday, including allegations that the FBI had videotaped Jefferson taking $100,000 in bribe money and then found $90,000 of that cash stuffed inside his apartment freezer.

That is not the interesting part. What is interesting is how both parties are responding to this raid:

Sounds Like A Cover Up

Posted 5/23/06 at 2:01am by jamie

Stories like this are just way to common anymore:

Thieves took sensitive personal information on 26.5 million U.S. veterans, including Social Security numbers and birth dates, after a Veterans Affairs employee improperly brought the material home, the government said Monday.

The information involved mainly those veterans who served and have been discharged since 1975, said VA Secretary Jim Nicholson. Data of veterans discharged before 1975 who submitted claims to the agency may have been included.

Nicholson said there was no evidence the thieves had used the data for identity theft, and an investigation was continuing.

"It's highly probable that they do not know what they have," he said in a briefing with reporters. "We have decided that we must exercise an abundance of caution and make sure our veterans are aware of this incident."

Veterans advocates expressed alarm.

"This was a very serious breach of security for American veterans and their families," said Bob Wallace, executive director of Veterans of Foreign Wars. "We want the VA to show leadership, management and accountability for this breach."

Why is it this employee had all this information at their house? Even more so - what are the odds that thieves happened to steal this information at the same time the employee had all the information there? Something just does not add up here.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter