March 2007

A Return to the Balance of Power

Posted 3/20/07 at 3:02pm by jamie

This is a very interesting development that I am sure Bush is working on blocking:

The Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to end the Bush administration's ability to unilaterally fill U.S. attorney vacancies as a backlash to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' firing of eight federal prosecutors.

Gonzales got a morale boost with a phone call from President George W. Bush, their first conversation since a week ago, when the president said he was unhappy with how the Justice Department handled the firings.

Also, the Senate by a 94-2 vote passed a bill that would cancel the attorney general's power to appoint U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation. Democrats say the Bush administration abused that authority when it fired the eight prosecutors and proposed replacing some with White House loyalists. The administration denied the charge.

(emphasis mine)

Of course Tom Delay is trying to spin this into some sort of "manufactured" scandal:

Former House Republican Leader Tom DeLay had said earlier Tuesday that the scandal "is just a taste of what's going to be like for the next two years."

"And the Bush administration sort of showed their weakness when they got rid of Don Rumsfeld," the Texan said on NBC television's "Today" show. "... This is a made up scandal. There is no evidence of wrongdoing whatsoever. ... They ought to be fighting back."

Right Tom. Because Congress' time and taxpayers money is better off spent investigating serious items such as blow jobs and Christmas card lists. Interesting that a man under indictment is the person the media wants to turn to for political opinion on this issue. Why don't they just ask Duke Cunningham about Carol Lam or Scooter Libby about Patrick Fitzgerald?

Ftizgerald Was on the List

Posted 3/20/07 at 9:17am by jamie

The document dump from the Department of Justice has shown one very well-known name on the list of those to possibly be fired:

U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald was ranked among prosecutors who had "not distinguished themselves" on a Justice Department chart sent to the White House in March 2005, when he was in the midst of leading the CIA leak investigation that resulted in the perjury conviction of a vice presidential aide, administration officials said yesterday.

The ranking placed Fitzgerald below "strong U.S. Attorneys . . . who exhibited loyalty" to the administration but above "weak U.S. Attorneys who . . . chafed against Administration initiatives, etc.," according to Justice documents.

The chart was the first step in an effort to identify U.S. attorneys who should be removed. Two prosecutors who received the same ranking as Fitzgerald were later fired, documents show.

Now isn't it ironic that Fitzgerald was also on the short list of names to fire? No there isn't anything political here. One prosecutor who brought down a corrupt Republican congressman, Randy Cunningham, gets fired right after her investigation leads to indictments of the former third ranking person at the CIA. Now we have the man who successfully prosecuted Scooter Libby also on the list.

I wonder how Fitzgerald didn't "distinguish" himself? I guess this isn't distinguishing to the administration:

Fitzgerald also won the Attorney General's Award for Distinguished Service in 2002 under Ashcroft

Fitzgerald has been coined one of the best prosecutors in the nation. That was well before the Libby trial. He has brought down some major corruption within government. This should remove any doubt on the entire purge and prove these firings were political.

Fallout Continues in Ohio Voting Scandal

Posted 3/20/07 at 9:04am by jamie

Last week, two election workers in Ohio got sentenced to 18 months in prison for rigging a recount in the 2004 presidential election. Now our new Secretary of State, Jennifer Brunner has asked the election board members to resign or be fired:

All four election board members for Cuyahoga County, troubled by recount rigging charges and voting machine problems, have been told to resign or face being fired, a state official said Monday.

Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner said she called the four board members of Ohio's most populous count late Sunday, asking them to leave by the close of business Wednesday.

The county, which includes all of Cleveland, has had difficulty adjusting to electronic voting. Last May's primary, the first attempt at electronic voting in the county, was marred by absent or poorly trained poll workers, lost vote-holding computer cards and a polling place that opened hours late

If these convictions would have come down 6 months ago, nothing would have happened on the state level. This is what happens when you got a proactive Secretary of State, as compared to Ken Blackwell, who did nothing.

Debunking the Klein Line

Posted 3/19/07 at 9:27pm by jamie

Joe Klein writes this:

Then again, the Republicans are fielding a motley crew right now: if you count Newt Gingrich, who'll probably join the fray in the fall, the four leading candidates have had nine marriages among them: Giuliani three, Gingrich three, McCain two and Romney one. The Republican faithful are left with a devil of a choice: moderate candidates who live like liberals, or religious conservatives who talk like liberals.

But as TPM points out none of the Democratic front-runners have been divorced AT ALL! Perhaps someone should tell Klein that these are Republicans acting like - well Republicans. They are the typical hypocrites.

U.S.A. Purge Tied With CIA Corruption Probe?

Posted 3/19/07 at 8:26am by jamie

Gee ya think?

Fired San Diego U.S. attorney Carol Lam notified the Justice Department that she intended to execute search warrants on a high-ranking CIA official as part of a corruption probe the day before a Justice Department official sent an e-mail that said Lam needed to be fired, U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Sunday.

Feinstein, D-Calif., said the timing of the e-mail suggested that Lam's dismissal may have been connected to the corruption probe.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse denied in an e-mail that there was any link.

"We have stated numerous times that no U.S. attorney was removed to retaliate against or inappropriately interfere with any public corruption investigation or prosecution," he wrote. "This remains the case and there is no evidence that indicates otherwise."

Today will be very interesting. Another big document dump is coming and everyone is predicting some more damaging evidence.

Bush Continues to Ignore the American People

Posted 3/18/07 at 9:10am by jamie

You think the White House would have learned something last November, but obviously that is wrong:

The president with the fewest vetoes in more than a century, George W. Bush is poised to make up for lost time as congressional Democrats move legislation the White House says is unacceptable.

In the past week alone the White House threatened to veto House bills dealing with presidential records and protection for whistle-blowers, and a defeated Senate bill that would have set a deadline for withdrawal from Iraq.

The White House also warned that a war-spending bill the House will take up this coming week would face a veto because it contains Iraq withdrawal language.

Yeah - because we all know Bush has made such great decisions for our country in the past. That is why he is so loved by the American people and has such a high approval rating.</sarcasm>

More on Carl Lindner

Posted 3/17/07 at 11:00am by jamie

I posted earlier this week about Cincinnati billionaire Carl Lindner and his deep pockets for the GOP. As you recall, Lindner was the CEO of Chiquita during the time they were supporting terrorist organizations in South America. In that post I directed the readers to Newsmeat to check out Carl's past donations. I also noted that his name was spelled as Linder and Lindner. I wasn't sure about the reason for this, and thought it may have just been a typo. Well thanks to a reader of IntoxiNation, we find out it may very well not be a typo, but rather an attempt to bypass the caps on donations. City Beat, a Cincinnati publication, has the details on their blog:

Lindner, his wife, sons and other family members are well known as big-money political campaign contributors, mostly to conservative Republican candidates and causes including President Bush. A review of documents filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), however, show that the family also gives money to candidates under the similar name of “Linder.”

The pattern of listing campaign contributions without the second “n” in the family’s name isn’t limited to one or two reports, and appears to be a pattern going back several years.

According to documents filed with the FEC, it’s not just one “Linder” error, and it’s not just Carl Jr.’s last name being misspelled repeatedly; the same error shows up with a variety of other Lindner family members, including his wife, Edyth, and his son, Carl III.

Debunking "Clinton Did It"

Posted 3/17/07 at 9:12am by jamie

(image courtesy of Democracy Lost)

Once again we have a scandal surrounding the current White House and once again we have the right-wing talking heads out there with towing their typical defense of "well Clinton did it". This time the excuse is being applied to the U.S.A. purge. A lot of Bush apologists are out there using this claim that "Well Clinton got rid of all 93". That is true, but not valid when talking about the current purge. If they want to use that excuse then they might as well say Bush 41 did it and so did Reagan. When ever an administration takes over they generally fire all U.S.A.s and start fresh. This is a practice that has gone on for a very long time, and a practice that really should be changed. I'll have more on changing it in a bit, but first I want to discuss why this incident is not the same as Clinton's firing of all 93.

Bush Was Really Worried About The Plame Leak

Posted 3/16/07 at 2:04pm by jamie

He was going to get right to the bottom of it! Sure he was:

Dr. James Knodell, director of the Office of Security at the White House, told a congressional committee today that he was aware of no internal investigation or report into the leak of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame.

The White House had first opposed Knodell testifying but after a threat of a subpoena from the committee yesterday he was allowed to appear today.
Knodell testified that those who had participated in the leaking of classified information were required to attest to this and he was not aware that anyone, including Karl Rove, had done that.

He said that he had started at the White House in August 2004, a year after the leak, but his records show no evidence of a probe or report there: "I have no knowledge of any investigation in my office," he said

Hell why should they investigate? Bush knew damn good and well who leaked it and who directed it. Instead he wanted to put on this show of outrage and spend millions for Fitzgerald to investigate. Sounds like Congress now needs to investigate Bush further.

Grow Surge Grow

Posted 3/16/07 at 8:55am by jamie

Wow things must be going really well with this surge now:

The top US commander in Iraq has requested another Army brigade, on top of five already on the way, as part of the controversial "surge" of American troops designed to clamp down on sectarian violence and insurgent groups, senior Pentagon officials said today.

The appeal -- not yet made public -- by Gen. David Petraeus for a combat aviation unit would involve between 2,500 and 3,000 more soldiers and dozens of transport helicopters and powerful gunships, said the Pentagon sources. That would bring the planned expansion of US forces so far to close to 30,000 troops.

News of the additional deployment comes about a week after President Bush announced that about 4,700 support troops will join the initial 21,500 he ordered in January. They are in addition to the estimated 130,000 troops already in Iraq.

"This is the next shoe to drop," said one senior Pentagon official closely involved in the war planning. "But you cannot put five combat brigades in there and not have more aviation guys, military police, and intelligence units."

The last paragraph really makes me wonder. Is this "pentagon official" suggesting that Bush sent in the troops, but not the needed support? No - not our President. Yeah right. Sounds like Bush may have been playing politics when he announced the surge. 21,500 sounds like a good number, 30,000 might be a bad thing. Actually it is sounding more and more like the rumored number of 40,000 might become a reality.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter