June 2007

Now September Might Be To Soon

Posted 6/29/07 at 9:15am by jamie

Looks like Bush doesn't like his date of September to gauge the progress of the "surge":

Mr. Warner said that July 15, when a Congressionally mandated, preliminary report on the progress in Iraq is due, would be pivotal. The White House has been hoping for far more time, even backing away from its earlier statements that September would be a fair deadline to start judging the results of the new war plan.

Mr. Bush in effect pleaded for more time on Thursday, saying that the deployments he ordered in his so-called troop surge have only recently been completed and were already producing positive results. Amid a stream of attacks by insurgents, American forces have been leading a major offensive to uproot them. (emphasis added)

Yet again Bush got something wrong on his war. If a CEO of a corporation is making poor decisions that is costing the company money, he is quickly thrown out on the street. So why don't we do that when the CEO of America is making poor decisions that not only cost us money, but is costing lives? Maybe John Boehner should think of that when using one of his cute business analogies to describe the Iraq war.

Dismissing Coulter's Scapegoat

Posted 6/28/07 at 5:35pm by jamie

This is getting old. Ann Coulter is out on our public airwaves using a defense any 5 year old would use (and she is suppose to be a lawyer?). That defense is simple - "Well Bill Maher did it". Wow Ann - if Bill Maher jumped off a bridge, would you?

So let's look at Anne's defense. What she is under fire for is the following statement:

"I've learned my lesson. If I'm gonna say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot." (emphasis added)

Now she is saying that Bill Maher said the same thing about Dick Cheney. During episode 503 of Real Time with Bill Maher, the round table turned to the hot topic of the week of a suicide bombing in Afghanistan, in which Dick Cheney was the target. Bill was discussing with his panel the decision of the Huffington Post to close the comments on the news thread about the attempt, because people were commenting that they were upset Cheney survived. I dug through my archives and here is the video of the segment:

Down With Legacy

Posted 6/28/07 at 1:10pm by jamie

So goes it goes for Bush. He was planning on the immigration bill being his legacy. Well his own party just did him in.

The ironic part is how Bush is saying that Senate needs to work together to tackle tough issues. How many filibusters have the Republicans had this year? The same tactic they said should be done away with. Interesting.

Cheney Gets A Subpoena

Posted 6/27/07 at 6:23pm by jamie

This will be so much fun:

The Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed the White House and Vice President Dick Cheney's office Wednesday for documents relating to President Bush's warrantless eavesdropping program.

Also named in subpoenas signed by committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., were the Justice Department and the National Security Council. The four parties have until July 18 to comply, according to a statement by Leahy's office.

The committee wants documents that might shed light on internal disputes within the administration over the legality of the program.

"Our attempts to obtain information through testimony of administration witnesses have been met with a consistent pattern of evasion and misdirection," Leahy said in his cover letters for the subpoenas. "There is no legitimate argument for withholding the requested materials from this committee."

Now will he claim "executive privilege"? But Cheney isn't under the executive branch - his words. So if he tries to play that he is in the legislative branch, then the subpoena should stand. Just ask William Jefferson.

Elizabeth Edwards Takes On Coultergeist

Posted 6/26/07 at 6:15pm by jamie

This was some great TV. While Coulter was doing her piece of cake appearance on Hardball, she got a surprise. Elizabeth Edwards called in to confront her on her hateful speech. Check it out (thanks to TPM):

 Coulter looked a little nervous during this call. You can tell she wasn't expecting that.

And We Can Add Another GOPer To The List

Posted 6/26/07 at 3:57pm by jamie

No matter how much Tony Snow and the rest of the White House try to spin it, the fact remains - the news coming out of Iraq is not good. GOP Senators are also seeing this and not buying the typical spin:

Sen. George Voinovich said Tuesday the U.S. should begin pulling troops out of Iraq, joining Richard Lugar as the second Republican lawmaker in as many days to suggest President Bush's war strategy is failing.

He said the Iraqi people must become more involved and "I don't think they'll get it until they know we're leaving."

The Ohio senator's remarks followed similar comments by Lugar, R-Ind., the previous night. The two GOP senators previously had expressed concerns about Bush's decision to send 30,000 extra troops to Iraq in a massive U.S.-led security push in Baghdad and Anbar province. But they had stopped short of saying U.S. troops should leave and declined to back Democratic legislation setting a deadline for troop withdrawals.

"We must not abandon our mission, but we must begin a transition where the Iraqi government and its neighbors play a larger role in stabilizing Iraq," Voinovich wrote in a letter to Bush. (emphasis mine)

The last part is kind of idiotic. Hasn't this been the goal since the surge? This is what is failing right now. Saying that doesn't mean things are going to work. The mission is failed and our troops on the ground ARE NOT to blame. The ones to blame are the warhawks sitting in the White House and Pentagon who suffer such a disconnect from reality that it has lead us to this dark point in our history. Of course Bush won't admit that, because it is admitting fault on his part. His opinion of himself matters more than the lives of our soldiers and security of our nation.

Another GOP Senator Jumping Ship?

Posted 6/26/07 at 10:20am by jamie

September is getting closer and closer, while our goal of "success" in Iraq is getting further and further:

Sen. Richard Lugar, a senior Republican and a reliable vote for President Bush on the war, said Monday that Bush's Iraq strategy was not working and that the U.S. should downsize the military's role.

The unusually blunt assessment deals a political blow to Bush, who has relied heavily on GOP support to stave off anti-war legislation.

It also comes as a surprise. Most Republicans have said they were willing to wait until September to see if Bush's recently ordered troop buildup in Iraq was working.

"In my judgment, the costs and risks of continuing down the current path outweigh the potential benefits that might be achieved," Lugar, R-Ind., said in a Senate floor speech. "Persisting indefinitely with the surge strategy will delay policy adjustments that have a better chance of protecting our vital interests over the long term."

So will people like Lugar stand up for their convictions in September and vote to bring the troops home, or is this another case of politicking on the Senate floor? Only time will tell.

The Rogue Cheney

Posted 6/24/07 at 12:06pm by jamie

I had a feeling the news of Cheney's saying he is not part of the executive branch would start a fire storm. I just had no idea it would be this big.

Rahm Emanuel is showing a pair and ready to really go after Cheney in a way that sounds perfectly legal:

Following Vice President Dick Cheney's assertion that his office is not a part of the executive branch of the US government, Democratic Caucus Chairman Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) plans to introduce an amendment to the the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill to cut funding for Cheney's office.

The amendment to the bill that sets the funding for the executive branch will be considered next week in the House of Representatives.

Emanuel also suggested that Cheney needs to return his salary to the U.S. taxpayers and move out of the house paid for by us. Since that house is paid for by us and for the Vice President of the United States, who is part of the executive branch, I say Cheney be evicted immediately. Hell - I say he gets charged with trespassing!

The Washington Post has also started a four part series today about Cheney, entitled "Angler". Think Progress has already torn into part one and discovered this:

Shortly after Bush was elected, “Cheney preferred, and Bush approved, a mandate that gave him access to ‘every table and every meeting,’ making his voice heard in ‘whatever area the vice president feels he wants to be active in.’”

How They Say Anything

Posted 6/23/07 at 10:57am by jamie

Right wingers always look at us like we are crazy when we talk about the flat out lies the White House tells. Well here is they are actually the ones who deserve the crazy look.

Think Progress has a video up of last night's Countdown. During yesterday's White House briefing, Dana Perino told reporters this in regards to Cheney exempting himself from the law:

PERINO: If you look on page 18 of the EO, when you have a chance, there’s a distinction regarding the Vice President versus what is an agency. And the President also, as the author of an EO, and the person responsible for interpreting the EO, did not intend for the Vice President to be treated as an agency, and that’s clear.

Sure - that makes it all better. Doesn't it?

But wait! Keith Olbermann didn't buy it and the people at MSNBC looked into this further:

OLBERMANN: No exemption at all for the Vice President on page 18. So we emailed the White House, which referred us to section 1.3 — which is about something else altogether — and 5.2 — which makes no mention of the Vice President. In fact, there is no exemption for the President or the Vice President when it comes to reporting on classified material.

So again we have a White House flat out lying to the American people. True what do we expect from Dana Perino. It was her husband who thought he was above the law and landed himself in the slammer. Just another part of the Bush crime family.

The New GOP Fix For Illegal Immigration

Posted 6/22/07 at 6:41pm by jamie

Condoms!

A congressman is pushing a not-so-quick fix in the debate over illegal immigrants from Mexico: free contraceptives.

"A slower rate of growth of Mexico's population would improve the economy of Mexico. It would also reduce the environmental pressure on Mexico's ecosystem. But a slower rate of growth would also reduce the long-term illegal immigration pressure on America's borders," reasoned Rep. Mark Kirk, who also supports stronger border security in the short-term.

In reality, fertility rates have plunged in Mexico since 1980, when an average couple would have five or more children. Now, the country's fertility rate has dropped to 2.5 children, compared to 2.1 for the United States, according to United Nations data.

Kirk, an Illinois Republican, made the argument on Thursday during a heated debate in the House of Representatives over whether the U.S. government should be allowed to donate condoms and other contraceptives to family planning agencies abroad that also engage in abortion.

Now come on congressman. That goes against the GOP principal of "abstinence only".

Where in the hell does the GOP get these people?

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter