September 2007

Now FOX Needs Denounced

Posted 9/30/07 at 9:28am by jamie

Glenn Greenwald has torn apart the smear attack against our troops, which was launched by FOX news analyst David Hunt. The entire thing deserves a good reading, because this is a far more brazen attack than any Move On ad. Hunt is targeting the generals, and as the resolutions passed by the House and Senate tell us - if you attack the general you also attack the troops.

So will we have yet another resolution denouncing Hunt and FOX news for this attack? As we hear more about these attacks, it shows Barbara Boxer's resolution denouncing "any attack" was the more appropriate approach for the Senate.

There is a catch-22 on these resolutions though. Every member of House and Senate must vote exactly the same on the new resolution condemning Rush, as well as one condemning FOX (if there is one). That includes Obama not voting. Democrats who voted against the MoveOn ad must vote against any other resolutions of this nature. If they fail to then it shows a definitive sense of hypocrisy.

Personally I feel that the Senate should never have voted on the MoveOn resolution. They are sworn to help uphold the Constitution, and this was an attempt to silence the freedom of speech that makes our country great. Times have changed over the past couple of weeks though and some politicians greedy for political cover decided to open Pandora's box. The Move On resolution set a precedent and now it must be followed.

The more our Congress follows these idiotic decisions, the closer we get to needing another constitutional convention. If you are for the war or not, you should be ashamed of the fact our Congress spends time debating what we say instead of debating what can change our country for the better.

The Great White Hype

Posted 9/30/07 at 9:11am by jamie

Gingrich won't run for President:

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Saturday decided against running for president in 2008 after determining he could not legally explore a bid and remain head of his tax-exempt political organization.

Gingrich, 64, said the change of heart, which came as aides readied the NewtNow.org Web site and prepared to file campaign papers, was the result of legal advice that running for president would require stepping down as chairman of his organization, American Solutions (for Winning the Future).

That group is the latest vehicle for the Georgia Republican's musings about politics and policy, and opened its first "ideas summit" Saturday at a Georgia college an hour west of Atlanta.

Looks like the Republicans last hope has now been extinguished. They might as well stay home next November.

Search Results

Posted 9/29/07 at 4:06pm by jamie

Republicans Giving Bush A Pass On Iraq

Posted 9/28/07 at 12:51pm by jamie

That's exactly what this is:

A small group of Republicans facing election fights next year have rallied around war legislation they think could unite the GOP: call for an end to U.S. combat in Iraq, but wait until President Bush is out of office.

The legislation was deemed essentially a nonstarter by Democrats Friday and underscored the difficulty Congress has in striking a bipartisan compromise on the war. What attracts Democrats has repelled Republicans and vice versa, making it impossible so far to find a middle ground.

"To try to put this off until after the election, rather than a reasonable period of completion, I believe would be to unnecessarily introduce a political element to what is a bipartisan effort," said Sen. Carl Levin, the Democratic chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

The proposal, by Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, would require that Bush change the mission of U.S. troops from combat to primarily support roles, such as training Iraqi security forces and protecting U.S. infrastructure in Iraq. His legislation would set a goal of completing such a mission transition within 15 months.

Yup and then if these Senators get re-elected (most likely not) and we have a Democrat in the White House (very possible), watch for them to become the sudden "anti-war" party. This is just another episode of how Republicans don't give a shit about our troops. Instead they want to rally behind the worse President in the history of this country and play politics with our soldiers.

The Party Of Crackers

Posted 9/28/07 at 10:19am by jamie

Well the GOP had their debate last night and this is what it looked like:

2007-09-28-brbr

Romney, Thompson, McCain and Giuliani all choose to do fundraisers instead of answer questions in front of black voters. Not really shocking - we already know they are the party of "white Christians", they just decided to reaffirm this.

Troops Supporting Withdrawal Are "Phony Troops"?

Posted 9/27/07 at 6:42pm by jamie

So says Rush Limbaugh:

During the September 26 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh called service members who advocate U.S. withdrawal from Iraq “phony soldiers.” He made the comment while discussing with a caller a conversation he had with a previous caller, “Mike from Chicago,” who said he “used to be military,” and “believe[s] that we should pull out of Iraq.” Limbaugh told the second caller, whom he identified as “Mike, this one from Olympia, Washington,” that “[t]here’s a lot” that people who favor U.S. withdrawal “don’t understand” and that when asked why the United States should pull out, their only answer is, ” ‘Well, we just gotta bring the troops home.’ … ‘Save the — keeps the troops safe’ or whatever,” adding, “[I]t’s not possible, intellectually, to follow these people.” “Mike” from Olympia replied, “No, it’s not, and what’s really funny is, they never talk to real soldiers. They like to pull these soldiers that come up out of the blue and talk to the media.” Limbaugh interjected, “The phony soldiers.” The caller, who had earlier said, “I am a serving American military, in the Army,” agreed, replying, “The phony soldiers.”

Oh The Standards That Are Double

Posted 9/26/07 at 6:11pm by jamie

Some Republicans are calling for the House to investigate the New York Time's charging MoveOn a lower rate on the "Betray Us" ad. Well it looks like the New York Times isn't the only ones guilty of such an error:

The Star Tribune will be refunding about $12,000 spent on a full-page ad to Al Franken's Senate campaign, a Franken campaign spokesman says.

This week, Sen. Norm Coleman's campaign took out a full-page ad in the newspaper criticizing Franken for not condemning a New York Times ad by MoveOn.org, which had attacked General David Petraeus.

Coleman's campaign says it paid a little over $23,000 on the ad — far less than the $37,000 that Franken's campaign says it paid for a full-page ad two months ago.

Glad they are refunding money to Franken, but was this an "accident"? Perhaps the House should investigate this, if they are too take up the MoveOn ad.

(h/t TPM Election Central)

Perhaps Senate Needs To Condemn Themselves

Posted 9/25/07 at 9:47am by jamie

Instead of debating Iraq, they choose to go after a political ad. A political ad has never killed anyone. Iraq has killed thousands. Now there is even more evidence that they should have done their job on debating Iraq. Today's Washington Post has a front page article on how Petraeus did cook the books. He did go before Congress and lie about the numbers. He did betray us.

On Sept. 1, the bullet-riddled bodies of four Iraqi men were found on a Baghdad street. Two days later, a single dead man, with one bullet in his head, was found on a different street. According to the U.S. military in Iraq, the solitary man was a victim of sectarian violence. The first four were not.

Such determinations are the building blocks for what the Bush administration has declared a downward trend in sectarian deaths and a sign that its war strategy is working. They are made by a specialized team of soldiers who spend their nights at computer terminals, sifting through data on the day's civilian victims for clues to the motivations of killers.

Now this is something that we have known about. The media has been reporting this variation in numbers for the past couple months. Now here is where it gets interesting:

Wow Republicans Really Are Stupid!

Posted 9/24/07 at 5:52pm by jamie

Looks like the House Republicans wants the House Oversight Committee to investigate the New York Times for publishing the MoveOn ad at a cheaper than usual rate (a mistake on the NYT's people that Move On is paying for).

So will the same Republicans allow an investigation into FOX news for being a platform for the GOP? How about going after any other media outlet that does something partisan? Nah - they will stick to being communists.

Bush Back On Social Security

Posted 9/24/07 at 2:35pm by jamie

Dejavu all over:

The Bush administration said Monday the only way to permanently fix Social Security is through some combination of benefit cuts and tax increases.

That was one of the key findings in a new paper on Social Security released by the Treasury Department in an effort to achieve common ground on the politically explosive issue.

"Social Security can be made permanently solvent only by reducing the present value of scheduled benefits and/or increasing the present value of scheduled tax increases," the paper said. The Treasury paper said that while other changes to the giant benefit program might be desirable "only these changes can restore solvency permanently."

Of course they are throwing tax hikes in there to scare the conservatives into buying onto the Bush plan. Here might be a way to fund this better - how about spending the $150 billion a year for this failed war on Social Security? Yeah - the murderers in the White House will never allow that.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter