January 2009

Is Coleman Taking The Hint?

Posted 1/22/09 at 11:47am by jamie

coleman2 It sure sounds like it:

Last session's senior senator from Minnesota Norm Coleman, still battling Al Franken to be seated in the Senate, has taken a paid job as a consultant to the Republican Jewish Coalition, which harshly attacked Obama last fall, its executive director, Matt Brooks, said.

Coleman will join the group as a "consultant and strategic advisor," and will also travel the country fundraising on the group's behalf, Brooks said.

"It's an opportunity for him to, now that he's got some down time on his hands, to really help us while this case is being adjudicated," Brooks said. "He hasn't given up at all" on retaking the Minnesota seat.

Since Coleman is now seeking new employment, perhaps we can go ahead and seat Franken today.

Reagan Beat Obama!

Posted 1/22/09 at 9:32am by jamie

That’s the big wingnut talking point right now. They are going on how Reagan’s inauguration ratings beat out Obama’s 41.8 million to 37.8 million. Of course those numbers are just television views. How about other things like the internet? Well let’s look at the reported number of stream views for the event:

  • CNN – 21.3 million
  • MSNBC – 14 million
  • FOX – 5 million

So internet views alone accounted for 40.3 million viewers. Add that to Obama’s television viewership and you got 78.1 million stream views. That also doesn’t take into account the number of local or international media outlets that streamed it. You can safely say Obama topped 100 million viewers.

Of course those numbers don’t matter to the right. They still live in the 80s, when people had to take off work to view the event, instead of watching it on their computer or setting their DVR and checking it out once they got home (although they could have recorded it on their shiny new BetaMax back in 81).

Happy Now?

Posted 1/22/09 at 8:02am by jamie

So Obama retook the oath of office last night after John Roberts screwed up the original one on Tuesday. Will that make the wingnuts happy? Of course not.

Capture

So now FOX and the rest of the right has something to bitch about. I’m sure they will try to claim this also nullifies his presidency, even though article 2, section 1 of our Constitution says nothing about using a bible (funny – it seems our founding fathers didn’t want that religious emblem in the fabric of our nation). Hell he could put his hand on a big, fat sack of weed and it would be fine constitutionally.

Impeach Him!

Posted 1/21/09 at 5:32pm by jamie

The wingnuts have found their ammo against Obama that could lead to his removal from office. On day 1 he is already violating rules!

art.ovaloffice.cnn

The astute reporters at Clownhall Townhall, with cues from CNN, already notes this major violation:

Obama Breaks Reagan/Bush Oval Office Jacket Rule 

You can even see the seriouseness of this violation of rules in the comments on their site:

douglas writes:
Wednesday, January, 21, 2009 2:00 PM

lack of respect

first sign of whats ahead, he does not respect the tridition (sic) of the office and shows that on day one.

Yes because out of everything facing the nation today, the proper outer attire trumps it all.

Republicans Block Holder Confirmation Hearing

Posted 1/21/09 at 4:21pm by jamie

Just breaking on CNN that Republicans on the Judiciary Committee have blocked the confirmation of Eric Holder for Attorney General for one week. Apparently the big show stopped was rather or not he would prosecute people involved with torture (imagine that).

This leads me to a couple of points:

What do the Republicans have against a black man becoming AG? Isn’t that the same thing they said with the Burris Senate appointment when Democrats weren’t going to seat him?

Also – how can we survive without an AG during this time of terrorism? We heard that repeatedly from Republicans when it came to the confirmation of Michael Mukasey.

UPDATE

Think Progress points out the following from John Cornyn:

“It could well be there will be a request to delay the markup for a week so those questions can be asked and answered,” Cornyn said. “Part of my concern relates to his statements at the hearing with regard to torture and what his intentions are toward our intelligence personnel who were operating in good faith based on their understanding of what the law was.”

You know, I decided to rob a bank because I thought the law said it was ok if I needed to eat. I guess I shouldn’t be prosecuted either. And isn’t it funny how the same one holding up this confirmation is the same person that held up Clinton’s. Keep obstructing and 2010 will be a year of a super-majority for Democrats in the Senate.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter