February 2009

The Double Edged Sword

Posted 2/21/09 at 8:48am by jamie

One thing I have always had against interest groups is their ability to look at a situation as a whole. I am an avid environmentalist, but if there was a scenario in which 1000’s of acres of forest had to be leveled for a group of people to survive then I say go for it.

Likewise, I also fully support human rights:

Amnesty International and a pro-Tibet group voiced shock Friday after US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton vowed not to let human rights concerns hinder cooperation with China.

Paying her first visit to Asia as the top US diplomat, Clinton said the United States would continue to press China on long-standing US concerns over human rights such as its rule over Tibet.

"But our pressing on those issues can't interfere on the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis and the security crisis," Clinton told reporters in Seoul just before leaving for Beijing.

Clinton’s reasoning is sound enough, but there is actually more to it than Amnesty International is acknowledging:

With the export-heavy Chinese economy reeling from the U.S. downturn, Clinton sought in meetings with Premier Wen Jiabao and other top Chinese government leaders to reassure Beijing that its massive holdings of U.S. Treasury notes and other government debt would remain a good investment.

"I appreciate greatly the Chinese government's continuing confidence in United States treasuries. I think that's a well-grounded confidence," Clinton told reporters at a joint news conference with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi.

Right Wing Extremist Trying To Starve Citizens

Posted 2/21/09 at 8:23am by jamie

Or Republican Governor refuses stimulus money because of some failed far right ideology:

When President Obama signed the Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act last week, it included three different provisions to benefit unemployed workers. The first provided funding to states that allowed for a $25 per week increase in benefits. The second extended the Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) program which gives 20 weeks of federally-funded unemployment benefits to individuals “who had already collected all regular state benefits,” while the third provision widened the pool of people eligible to receive unemployment benefits.

Today, however, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal announced his intention to oppose changing state law to allow his Lousiana citizens to qualify for the second two unemployment provisions. Jindal said the state would only be accepting money to increase the unemployment insurance payments for those who currently qualify</a> for unemployment insurance.

Republicans Trying To Get Better Online Logging

Posted 2/20/09 at 12:40pm by jamie

It looks like Republicans are trying to push through legislation that would require logs be kept for two years of people accessing networks:

Republican politicians on Thursday called for a sweeping new federal law that would require all Internet providers and operators of millions of Wi-Fi access points, even hotels, local coffee shops, and home users, to keep records about users for two years to aid police investigations.

The legislation, which echoes a measure proposed by one of their Democratic colleagues three years ago, would impose unprecedented data retention requirements on a broad swath of Internet access providers and is certain to draw fire from businesses and privacy advocates.

So if you have a wireless router on your home internet, then you would be required by law to keep access logs for two years. You can read the Senate bill here and the House bill here.

With all the communist talk going on, this really seems to take the cake.

10 Cent Millionaires

Posted 2/20/09 at 11:13am by jamie

Back around 96-97 I worked for a local plumbing company. We were the largest new construction plumbing company in the greater Cincinnati area, an area seeing a huge boom in new construction at the time. When I started with this company, my job was service technician. I would go to new homes we had done construction on and fix any problems that may have popped up after the new owners moved in.

During that time, we developed a phrase called “10 cent millionaires”. These were people who basically stretched themselves so thin to live in this new house that they couldn’t afford anything else. It was amazing, you would walk into a $250,000 house (which is upper end in Cincinnati). They would have two nice cars in the driveway, but inside the house was basically empty. It wasn’t that they hadn’t moved in yet – it was because they couldn’t afford much in the ways of furnishings.

One story really comes to mind. One day I got called out to one of these houses. The people wanted their icemaker hooked up. We charged $25 for this service, basically enough to cover our costs. When presented with this price, the homeowners were in shock. They quickly told me how there was no way they could afford this, as they have a big mortgage to pay now. As I left, I kept thinking to myself “well what are they going to do if a car breaks down, or someone gets sick?” It wasn’t like they had to give me cash, we gladly accepted every credit card and would even bill these people on a net-30 basis. I informed the couple of these payment options, and they still couldn’t muster up the $25.

What An Apology!

Posted 2/20/09 at 8:56am by jamie

The NYPost issued an “apology” for their cartoon that sparked off the protests and debate this week. I put apology in quotes, because it really isn’t that much of an apology, but rather an issue of “if you don’t like it and you didn’t really complain then we are sorry”.

{[}]lt;p>I wonder how the NYPost would respond if the NYTimes published a cartoon depicting Murdoch being shot? That would be a fun experiment to conduct, but I think the NYTimes holds themselves to a much higher standard than a Murdoch propaganda company.

Naming Names

Posted 2/19/09 at 10:00am by jamie

The entire UBS mess is getting even uglier, and by uglier I mean better:

The curtain is being peeled back on the infamous secrecy of Swiss banks.

The largest bank in Switzerland, UBS, agreed Wednesday to reveal the names of wealthy Americans whom the authorities suspect of using offshore accounts to evade taxes.

The change in policy is the result of UBS' admitted role in conspiring to defraud the Internal Revenue Service. As part of the agreement, the bank will pay $780 million in damages, and also close all offshore accounts of its American clients.

It is not clear how many names will be divulged, but the Feds have been looking into roughly 19,000 accounts, according to the New York Times.

So we are going to see which rich bastards have been abusing the system. This is a thing of beauty and could end up becoming a massive clean up in our financial sector.

Now I really wonder how much money the U.S. has lost because of this?

How much lower could our taxes actually be, because the rich has been screwing the system?

Hopefully this is the start to the end of offshore banking and these kind of scams. I don’t care if your worth $30 billion, you need to follow the same rules as the person worth $30 thousand.

Bachmaniac

Posted 2/19/09 at 7:49am by jamie

Following up from last night's post, here is Olbermann's coverage of crazy Michele Bachmann, and her constant lies about the stimulus.

Misplaced Priorities

Posted 2/18/09 at 8:11pm by jamie

Michelle Bachmann is back in the news, this time lying about the stimulus. She is making the false claim that ACORN will get $5 billion from the stimulus while under indictment. Again – a flat out lie.

So I was just thinking about this. If this was even true, then why hasn’t Bachmann voiced outrage over KBR getting another contract in Iraq while being under investigation for faulty wiring which lead to the deaths of as many as 18 of our soldiers? Even a colleague from her own state is questioning that, but Bachmann is silent.

I guess to Bachmann the troops just aren’t worth it. That’s pretty sick, but again she is a symbol of the right wing of this country.

UBS Bank To Pay $780 Million To IRS

Posted 2/18/09 at 5:50pm by jamie

The employer of Phil Gramm, the very man who championed to get rid of banking regulations and served as an economic adviser to the McCain Campaign, has been busted:

UBS AG, Switzerland’s largest bank, will pay $780 million to avoid U.S. prosecution and settle regulatory claims that it helped thousands of wealthy Americans use Swiss bank accounts to avoid paying taxes.

UBS agreed to resolve claims by the U.S. Justice Department that the bank helped U.S. citizens hide accounts from the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. government said in statements released today. Prosecutors won’t pursue criminal charges if UBS makes promised reforms while paying $400 million in tax-related payments. The bank must also disgorge $380 million under accords with prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The agreement resolves SEC claims that it acted as an unregistered broker-dealer and investment adviser to thousands of U.S. citizens who held accounts directly or in the names of others. UBS spokesman Mark Arena wasn’t available for comment.

I bet they aren’t too happy at UBS about this. Perhaps Gramm will call them a company of “whiners”.

So Does Not Paying Taxes Still Matter?

Posted 2/18/09 at 11:56am by jamie

Funny how the Republicans went after Obama cabinet nominees for tax problems, yet their own star has her own problems:

Gov. Sarah Palin must pay income taxes on thousands of dollars in expense money she received while living at her Wasilla home, under a new determination by state officials.

The governor's office wouldn't say this week how much she owes in back taxes for meal money, or whether she intends to continue to receive the per diem allowance. As of December, she was still charging the state for meals and incidentals.

"The amount of taxes owed is a private matter," Sharon Leighow, Palin's spokeswoman, said in an e-mail. "If the governor collects future per diem, those documents would be a matter of public record."

The revelation about Palin comes as U.S. senators, including Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, are under scrutiny over back taxes. A survey by the political newspaper and Web site Politico (www.politico.com) found that Begich was one of seven senators who acknowledged owing back taxes.

So it’s a “private” matter? Why didn’t Daschle and Geithner claim that! Oh – I guess it’s private since she is a Republican and we know they hate taxes so much.

Like I said during all the tax discussions – if we did an audit on all the politicians, people would be surprised out how bad the outcome would be.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter