May 2010

Feds Looking Into Criminal Charges Against BP

Posted 5/29/10 at 9:11am by jamie

About damn time:

A team of top federal prosecutors and investigators has taken the first steps toward a formal criminal investigation into oil giant BP's actions before and after the drilling rig disaster off Louisiana.

The investigators, who have been quietly gathering evidence in Louisiana over the last three weeks, are focusing on whether BP skirted federal safety regulations and misled the U.S. government by saying it could quickly clean up an environmental accident.

The team has met with U.S. attorneys and state officials in the Gulf Coast region and has sent letters to executives of BP and Transocean Ltd., the drilling rig owner, warning them against destroying documents or other internal records.

Now that BP officials are starting to plead the 5th about the explosion, it's past time to get them into a criminal court. And this shouldn't end up as the status-quo for corporations charged with crimes. People need to go to jail for this and BP needs a fine well beyond the typical amounts we hear, most of which would amount to about a day's profit for the oil giant.

The Criminalization Of Politics

Posted 5/28/10 at 10:51pm by jamie

I was just watching Bill Maher and they were talking about the Joe Sestak deal. The talk was about how the right wants to impeach President Obama over this, despite nothing illegal being done. Patrick Ruffini, a former Bush adviser, defended this by saying "Obama promised not to do this stuff", to which Jonathon Alter responded "this is the criminalization of politics". Nothing could be more true.

But if we are going down this road, then how about our last President, the man Ruffini worked for? His campaign in 2000 was based on "restoring integrity to the Oval Office", and we all see how that went. Restoring integrity was firing federal prosecutors for political reasons? How much integrity is involved in outing a covert CIA agent?

So if the Republicans want to play this game then it's time to also look at Bush. As matter of fact we might as well look at every President since George Washington, because what happened between Obama and Sestak and Obama "breaking campaign promises" has happened since our first President and with every single one since then.

Mystery Solved (UPDATED)

Posted 5/28/10 at 11:30am by jamie

There has been non-stop talk this week about Joe Sestak's job offer by the Obama administration if he wouldn't run against Arlen Specter. Now we have some answers:

Senior White House advisers asked former President Bill Clinton to talk to Joe Sestak about whether he was serious about running for Senate, and to feel out whether he'd be open to other alternatives, according to sources familiar with the situation.

But the White House maintains that the Clinton-Sestak discussions were informal, according to the sources. The White House, under pressure to divulge the specifics of its interactions with Sestak, will release a formal statement later today outlining their version of events, including Clinton's involvement.

As Gregg points out, the fact that Clinton was actually involved in this shows how much the White House didn't want Specter to have to face Sestak in the primary. Regardless, I still don't see anything illegal, or even unethical in this. These are the type of games that happen in Washington all the time. Sure the people are tired of it, but Democratic and Republican administrations have both engaged in the same practices for decades. The Republicans calling for a special prosecutor is nothing more than a grand stand, but given that Clinton is involved now, I'm sure they will push it even more.

UPDATE:

Per a breaking news alert from AP, Clinton suggested an "unpaid, advisory role" to Sestak. So it wasn't even an actual "job", but rather letting Sestak stay in the House and also act as an advisor. Nothing wrong with that.

Happy Birthday IntoxiNation

Posted 5/27/10 at 6:03pm by jamie

Tomorrow marks the 5th anniversary of IntoxiNation. I still have my very first post, Here We Go, saved in the system, despite all the changes over the years.

Speaking of changes, you probably noticed I have another new site template. I've been working on this one for awhile and really like it. I'm kind of taking IntoxiNation back to her roots.

Another new thing I've done is using an automatted tagging system. Some of the tags might seem kind of odd, but it all works towards the semantic web, making content easier to search and index.  The older posts don't have tags right now, but the system is churning away trying to get it caught up. It should be there in a couple of hours, then I'll do the clean up.

So here's looking forward to another 5 years and a big thanks to all my readers, some of which have been around since the old Blogger days. You guys are great and make blogging fun.

We’re Number 26!

Posted 5/27/10 at 5:56pm by jamie

As I’ve said countless times before; our nation is falling way behind in the world of internet communications. The latest international rankings now has the U.S. in 26th place when it comes to internet speed:

When South Koreans tested their wired broadband connections over the past 30 days, they found an average downstream speed of 34.14M bps (bits per second), according to the Net Index, which was introduced on Tuesday by Ookla, the creator of Speedtest. That was several times the worldwide average of 7.67M bps and 100 times as fast as the 340K bps downstream speed in Sudan, the lowest average out of 152 ranked countries.

Latvia (24.29M bps), the Republic of Moldova (21.37M bps), Japan (20.29M bps) and Sweden (19.78M bps) rounded out the top five countries for downstream broadband. The U.S. was ranked 26th in the world, with an average downstream speed of 10.16M bps. Upstream rankings were similar, with South Korea leading at 18.04M bps and the U.S. in 27th place with 2.21M bps. The world average was 2.10M bps.

This also doesn’t count penetration and price. The U.S. has some of the highest cost internet and still has large portions of the country without access to broadband. It’s really hard for us to compete in a 21st century economy with 20th century technology. If we don’t wake up soon, it will be too late and too costly to recover.

Local GOP Ousts Leader And Puts In Place A Tea Bagger

Posted 5/27/10 at 10:08am by jamie

I’ve blogged about our local GOP in the past and some of the problems he has faced. Well last night the Butler County GOP got together and voted him out of power:

The Butler County Republican party ousted its incumbent chairman Wednesday, May 26, voting instead for a Liberty Twp. trustee backed by some of the party’s biggest names as its new leader.

David Kern, a Tea Party activist, defeated incumbent chairman Tom Ellis in a 108-98 vote of the GOP’s central committee at Tori’s Station.

Kern had strong support from Congressman John Boehner and state Sen. Gary Cates, both West Chester Twp. Republicans who campaigned on Kern’s behalf earlier this week; Boehner in the form of a “robo-call” Tuesday evening and Cates in the form of a letter to the 298 central committee members.

So we have another example of the GOP being taken over by the Tea Party. Of course the new leader is just as out of touch as the outgoing one:

“The anger is not against us. The anger is at President (Barack) Obama’s socialist agenda,” Kern said. “Our goal is to do all we can ... to save our beloved republic.”

And yet people still rate the Democrats higher than Republicans in every public poll. Even Kern’s biggest supporter, John Boehner, helped President Bush turn a surplus into a deficit and grow the federal government. As matter of fact, want to know which party historically raises federal spending when in control of the White House?

Oil Pipeline In Alaska Shutdown After Spill

Posted 5/27/10 at 8:52am by jamie

And guess who is a part owner of it?

The Trans-Alaska Pipeline, partly owned by BP (BP.L), shut down on Tuesday after spilling several thousand barrels of crude oil into backup containers, drastically cutting supply down the main artery between refineries and Alaska's oilfields.

The accident comes at a difficult time for BP -- the largest single owner of the pipeline operator, holding 47 percent -- as it struggles to plug a gushing Gulf of Mexico oil well [ID:nN2597511].

The shutdown followed a series of mishaps that resulted from a scheduled fire-command system test at Pump Station 9, about 100 miles (161 km) south of Fairbanks, said Alyeska Pipeline Service Co, the operator of the 800-mile oil line.

The power outage triggered opening of relief valves, causing an unspecified volume of crude oil to overflow a storage tank into a secondary containment. There were no injuries, but the approximately 40 people at the work site were evacuated, Alyeska spokeswoman Michele Egan said.

It sounds like BP has taken a page right out of the old “winning hearts and minds” playbook of George Bush.

Top Kill Has Begun

Posted 5/26/10 at 4:03pm by jamie

BP has begun the “top kill” process of pumping drilling mud into the blow out preventer 5,000 feet below the sea. BP is saying this has a 60-70% chance of working, while President Obama is cautioning that there are no guarantees. At this stage of the game, I am not optimistic at all. So much of this depends on the condition of the blow out preventer, which is already faulty. If it wasn’t then we wouldn’t be in his mess.

Here’s a live feed from PBS you can check it out on.

Republicans Trying To Be Cute In Supporting Big Oil

Posted 5/26/10 at 9:08am by jamie

Yesterday another attempt to raise the liability limit on big oil for spills was blocked by the GOP. Now the GOP is trying their own bill:

After a third Republican block of a Democratic bill to raise the liability on oil spills, the GOP put forward its own bill on Tuesday afternoon. This one would eliminate the cap only for the current spill, but not change the cap set under the Oil Pollution Act for future spills, which stands at $75 million.

The new bill comes from Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and David Vitter (R-La.), and also contains provisions that would expedite the claims process for Gulf residents. Vitter said on the floor that their measure would hold BP to its pledge to cover all costs related to the current spill. "That's a contract offer," he said on the floor Tuesday. "We're saying we'll take it."

So Murkowski and Vitter want to pass a bill going after only BP for the current spill? And these people call them self Senator?

To show the problem with what Murkowski and Vitter is trying, I’ll go back to that pesky little document called “The Constitution”, particularly Article 1; Section 9:

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

And that is exactly what this measure is. Now either these two Senators are down right stupid, or they are being very sneaky. I tend to go with the second one. They know that if this passes, BP could take it to court and it would instantly get struck down as a constitutional violation.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter