June 2010

Boehner The Bar Fly

Posted 6/30/10 at 1:38pm by jamie

That according to Joe Scarborough:

From The Huffington Post:

"I hear it on the Hill, I'm sure you hear it on the Hill all the time, it's not reported, but so many Republicans tell me this is a guy that is not the hardest worker in the world," said Scarborough on Wednesday's edition of Morning Joe. "Every Republican I talk to says John Boehner, by 5 or 6 o'clock at night, you can see him at bars. He is not a hard worker."

And Boehner’s office doesn’t really seem to be denying it either:

"Boehner grew up with 11 brothers and sisters, and his dad owned a bar, but the only time he's 'around town' these days is to raise money for our House Republican team. Thus far this year, he's headlined more than 230 events and raised about $27 million. And that's just the beginning."

As a person represented by John Boehner, I have a serious problem with this. Our county (and John’s) is in serious financial trouble. Our sheriff’s office just did some major layoffs, and now we got 4 on duty at any given time to cover a huge area. All these troubles go on and yet our representative seems oblivious to them.

An Idea Of Awesomeness Magnitude

Posted 6/30/10 at 9:52am by jamie

<p>I think this is one of the best ideas I have <a href="http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0629/conyers-throws-grayson-cosponsors-war-making-poor-act/">ever heard out of Congress:</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>It seems that Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) would agree, perpetual war is making you poor.</p>

  <p>To begin rectifying the situation, he's joined with Congressman Alan Grayson (D-FL) in co-sponsoring the &quot;War is Making You Poor Act,&quot; which would limit defense spending to $548.9 billion: the exact figure alloted in the fiscal year 2011 budget.</p>

  <p>The act also seeks to utilize an additional $159.3 billion set aside for &quot;discretionary&quot; operations abroad to relieve the full federal income tax burden on every American's first $35,000 earned per year, or up to $70,000 per year for married couples.</p>

  <p>According to <a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2010/06/rep_john_conyers_co-sponsoring.html">Detroit publication MLive</a>, Conyers, who chairs the powerful <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/about/bio.html">House Committee on the Judiciary</a>, is adding his name to the roster of support.</p>

  <p>&quot;I believe that the thing we need to do is to take that $159 billion that the President has set aside – we’re not saying he has to stop the war, we’re not giving a cut-off date for the war – we’re simply saying you need to fund that out of the base budget of $549 billion,&quot; Grayson said of his bill. &quot;And we take 90 percent of that and give it back to the American people.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>

Meet The Strawman

Posted 6/29/10 at 11:05am by jamie

His name is Thurgood Marshall and he is being used as a strawman to go after Kagan in her confirmation hearings. But there's a problem. After the GOP used Marshall left and right yesterday, they couldn't even cite one ruling of Marshall's that they disagree with. I hope they can come up with something soon, because right now it looks like they don't care for Marshall because of another reason. Perhaps that reason is the color of his skin?

Right Wing Media Defending The Stupidity Of Sarah Palin

Posted 6/29/10 at 8:20am by jamie

Oh My! How dare this happen (via Fox):

Several reporters were caught on an open mike mocking Sarah Palin for delivering a "roller coaster"-type speech after she addressed California State University, Stanislaus on Friday.

As the former Alaska governor stepped off stage at the sold-out dinner fundraiser and the sound of applause faded away, voices identified as reporters in a viral video could be heard one after another cracking jokes about the speech.

Writing in the L.A. Times, former Bush aide Jimmy Orr has this to say:

Now, cries of media bias against conservatives will be supercharged with an....

... audio recording going viral that captured several reporters mocking a Sarah Palin speech that they were covering.

The yet-to-be-identified (and perhaps soon-to-be-fired) reporters were located in the “media overflow” room at Cal State Stanislaus, a California college where Palin was speaking on Friday.

Immediately after her speech concluded, the insults began in rapid-fire succession, with each reporter seeming to try to outdo each other.

As Media Matters points out:

Mocking a politician from a media overflow room is, of course, evidence of “media bias,” and perhaps even a firing offense -- as long as the politician being mocked is a Republican. When reporters heckled Al Gore while watching him in a debate, nobody got fired -- instead, they just continued lying about him in print and on the air. But reporters always seem to forget about that when they talk about media "bias."

If Government Can’t Limit The 2nd Amendment, What About The 4th?

Posted 6/28/10 at 11:10am by jamie

Today the Supreme Court ruled that states can’t impose laws hindering the gun rights:

The Supreme Court held Monday that the Constitution's Second Amendment restrains government's ability to significantly limit "the right to keep and bear arms," advancing a recent trend by the John Roberts-led bench to embrace gun rights.

By a narrow, 5-4 vote, the justices also signaled, however, that some limitations on the right could survive legal challenges.

Writing for the court in a case involving restrictive laws in Chicago and one of its suburbs, Justice Samuel Alito said that the Second Amendment right "applies equally to the federal government and the states."

Now thinking about this, it seems that the law was put in to protect the citizens. So wouldn’t the same now apply to the 4th amendment? What about warrantless wiretapping of phones? The argument Bush and the Republicans used was that it’s legal because they are doing so to “keep the people safe”. Well it seems like a stronger argument could now be made against that, citing this ruling.

Or could it?

Monday's decision did not explicitly strike down the Chicago area laws, ordering a federal appeals court to reconsider its ruling. But it left little doubt that they would eventually fall.

Still, Alito noted that the declaration that the Second Amendment is fully binding on states and cities "limits (but by no means eliminates) their ability to devise solutions to social problems that suit local needs and values."

That’s some pretty narrow language there. I think if one wanted to apply this to the 4th amendment and the Bush wiretapping, then it could be said that what Alito wrote wouldn’t apply.

RIP Robert Byrd

Posted 6/28/10 at 7:22am by jamie

The Senate's longest serving member, Robert Byrd, died this morning at the age of 92. This really isn't a big shocker. Byrd's health has been deteriorating for years and given his age, it was pretty much expected that this was coming after the news of his serious condition yesterday.

As far as a replacement for Byrd, well Nate Silver points out the timing on this. It looks like there will be a special election. If Byrd would have held on one more week, then the governor would have been able to appoint a replacement.

And then there's the big question - the fate of financial reform. That's pretty much uncertain now that the Democrats have one less vote. My guess is that it will be gutted even further to bring on Snowe or Collins.

Kit Bond And Orrin Hatch – Privacy Advocates!

Posted 6/27/10 at 8:45pm by jamie

The proposed “internet kill switch”, which passed out of the Senate Homeland Security Committee last week, has met some opposition:

"Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) has introduced his own cybersecurity legislation with Sen. Orrin Hatch, and he had some harsh words for a competing bill sponsored by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security. Bond said that bill, which has been criticized for allegedly giving the president a 'kill switch' over the Internet, weighs down the private sector with mandates and puts too much on the plate of the already overburdened Department of Homeland Security. Sen. Bond's bill would create a new position in the Pentagon, reporting directly to the President, in charge of coordinating all civilian cybersecurity. Any private-sector involvement would be voluntary and free from legal challenge, rather than mandated."

Remember when Bond and Hatch thought it was well within the authority of the government to force private telecommunication companies to spy on phone calls without a constitutionally mandated warrant? Wow things are different now that we have a Democrat in the White House.

Report: Dave Weigel Resigns At Washington Post

Posted 6/25/10 at 12:43pm by jamie

Ben Smith at Politico just posted this:

Washington Post Communications Director Kris Coratti emails: "Dave offered his resignation and we accepted it."

That's following yesterday's drama where Weigel apparently aired some frustrations regarding some right wing media types on a mailing list:

FishbowlDC has obtained e-mails written by WaPo's conservative-beat blogger Dave Weigel, that the scribe sent to JournoList, a listserv for liberal journalists. (Read up on JournoList with Yahoo! News's Michael Calderone's 2009 story that he wrote for Politico).

Seems Weigel doesn't like (and that would be putting it mildly) at least some of the conservatives he covers. Poor Drudge - Weigel wants him to light himself on fire.

Weigel posted an apology for his comments yesterday, but it seems that the damage had already been done.

This highlights an interesting double standard in our media today. You can call a Supreme Court Justice a "goat fucker" or even urge people to pull guns on census workers. What happens with that? You go on to become a contributor at one of the nation's biggest cable news outlets. However, if you blast someone like Matt Drudge, you will find yourself on the unemployment line.

Homeland Security Committee Protects Us From ‘Live Free or Die Hard’

Posted 6/25/10 at 9:33am by jamie

I guess Bruce Willis was unavailable to stop these threats:

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs approved a comprehensive cybersecurity bill on Thursday after amending it to limit the president's authority in the event of a cyber emergency.

The bill, co-sponsored by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Tom Carper (D-Del.) would make the Department of Homeland Security responsible for protecting civilian networks in the government and private sector. The bill will now head to the full Senate for a vote, where it will likely be merged with other competing pieces of cybersecurity legislation.

"These cyber attacks are increasingly more sophisticated, more persistent and more successful," Carper said. "In short — the status quo is simply not enough."

The original bill gave the president indefinite emergency authority to shut down private sector or government networks in the event of a cyber attack capable of causing massive damage or loss of life. An amendment passed Thursday limits that authority further, requiring the president to get Congressional approval after controlling a network for 120 days.

At least there is a little more protection in there from the original bill, but I sill question if the government is the best at dealing with these threats given the governments lag in catching up with technology.

So This Is What A Tea Bagger Candidate Looks Like?

Posted 6/24/10 at 10:17am by jamie

I thought one of the driving forces behind the Tea Party was a fight against the “business as usual” mentality that plagues our leaders. Rand Paul has done a great job of stereotyping himself as one of those type of leaders and this doesn’t help with that:

Kentucky Republican senatorial candidate Rand Paul wrote in a newspaper four years ago that he would have pardoned himself if he had been the state's scandal-plagued governor at the time.

Paul's opinion piece in the now-defunct Kentucky Post appeared shortly before a judge dismissed accusations that then-Gov. Ernie Fletcher, a Republican, had violated state hiring laws. The same judge had previously ruled that Fletcher could not be tried while in office.

Yeah – he is really different….NOT!

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter