Even FOX Is Questioning Romney's Tax Cuts

Posted 10/15/12 at 8:37am by jamie

Yesterday Chris Wallace challenged Romney adviser Ed Gillespie on rather Romney's tax cut plans were feasible. At issue was the "six independent studies" that the Romney campaign has been touting. Here's the exchange from Think Progress:

GILLESPIE: Six different studies have said this is entirely doable.

WALLACE: Those are very questionable. Some of them are blogs, some of them are from AEI, an independent group.

GILLESPIE: These are very credible sources.

WALLACE: One of them is a blog from a guy who was a top adviser for George W. Bush. These are hardly non-partisan studies.

GILLESPIE: Look Chris these AEI and other studies are very credible sources of analysis

So to Romney, an adviser to George Bush is non-partisan.

It's also amazing that the hundreds of other analysis that have come out, which say there is no way that Romney can cut the top earners tax rate by 20% without significantly raising taxes on the middle class, is just impossible. Instead Romney has chosen the very few studies that say it can be done.

But there is something even more interesting in this exchange. It's something I have hammered Romney on before - a lack of plan. Well Gillespie offers more insight into that. It shows that Mitt Romney is a man not worried about country, but worried about only him:

Ed Gillespie went on TV this morning and said Mitt Romney would only reveal the details of his tax plan after he’s sworn into office as President.

In Playing Politics GOP Once Again Ousts The CIA

Posted 10/11/12 at 9:51am by jamie

During an open and televised hearing of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, House Republicans decided to out a CIA base Benghazi. The hearing, which was in fact nothing more than another witch hunt conducted by Darrell Issa, the following occurred:

Through their outbursts, cryptic language and boneheaded questioning of State Department officials, the committee members left little doubt that one of the two compounds at which the Americans were killed, described by the administration as a “consulate” and a nearby “annex,” was a CIA base. They did this, helpfully, in a televised public hearing.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was the first to unmask the spooks. “Point of order! Point of order!” he called out as a State Department security official, seated in front of an aerial photo of the U.S. facilities in Benghazi, described the chaotic night of the attack. “We’re getting into classified issues that deal with sources and methods that would be totally inappropriate in an open forum such as this.”

Now this may seem rather cryptic, but Dana Milbank goes into further detail, using his knowledge of Washington, to describe what was actually being talked about:

May still be a facility? The plot thickened — and Chaffetz gave more hints. “I believe that the markings on that map were terribly inappropriate,” he said, adding that “the activities there could cost lives.”

Growing Meningitis Outbreak Linked to Steroid

Posted 10/8/12 at 11:20am by jamie

A growing outbreak of fungal meningitis has claimed 7 lives and infected up to 64 people across 9 states. The rate that the outbreak is growing is also alarming:

The total number of cases has also grown to 64 people in nine states, the CDC said. That is 17 more cases and two more states than the day before.

Patients contracted the deadly meningitis after being injected in their spine with a preservative-free steroid called methylprednisolone acetate that was contaminated by a fungus. The steroid is used to treat pain and inflammation.

The steroid is manufactured by compound pharmacies. Compounding is used to create special blends of medications that aren't available on the market, as well as to custom tailor drugs to fit a certain patients needs. According to a 2003 GAO report, nearly 10% of all drugs administered in the Untied States are compound manufactured. But how safe are these drugs? Well it depends on the state they are manufactured in:

Drugs manufactured by compound pharmacies do not have to go through FDA-mandated pre-market approval. Instead, oversight and licensing of these pharmacies comes from state health pharmacy boards.

The steroid causing this outbreak was manufactured by The New England Compounding Center, a pharmacy based in Massachusetts. When federal inspectors did come in to the plant last week, they found unopened vials of the steroid that contained foreign particles. After testing one of these vials, the particle was determined to be the fungus causing this meningitis.

Supreme Court Sneak Peek: You Own It, But Can You Sell It?

Posted 10/8/12 at 8:51am by jamie

This Fall, the Supreme Court will be taking up a case that can really affect all of us. The case will determine if you actually have the right to sell a used product that was made or contains parts from overseas:

At issue in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons is the first-sale doctrine in copyright law, which allows you to buy and then sell things like electronics, books, artwork and furniture, as well as CDs and DVDs, without getting permission from the copyright holder of those products.

Under the doctrine, which the Supreme Court has recognized since 1908, you can resell your stuff without worry because the copyright holder only had control over the first sale.

Put simply, though Apple Inc. AAPL -0.62% has the copyright on the iPhone and Mark Owen has it on the book “No Easy Day,” you can still sell your copies to whomever you please whenever you want without retribution.

That’s being challenged now for products that are made abroad, and if the Supreme Court upholds an appellate court ruling, it would mean that the copyright holders of anything you own that has been made in China, Japan or Europe, for example, would have to give you permission to sell it.

So if a product contains any foreign made parts, then you can be caught up by this. Want to sell your used Chevy or Ford? Well there are a lot of parts in those "America" made vehicles that come from overseas, so selling your used car, or even trading it in, can now make you a criminal.

Having a yard sale and want to get that old TV out of the basement? Better not sell it without permission from the manufacturer.

And what will this do to services like EBay or Craig's List? Copyright trolls would have a field day going after people selling products on the popular auction sites.

The Desperate Right

Posted 10/3/12 at 10:53am by jamie

It started yesterday with Matt Drudge. On the Drudge Report, Matt was touting a headline that a bombshell video was coming later that would destroy Obama. Twitter and the right wing blogosphere instantly jumped on it.

Well last night the video came. Tucker Carlson's Daily Caller released the video, with Hannity promoting it at the top of his show. Here it is:

The first problem is that this video was known about and even seen back in 2007 when he made this speech. They are trying to equate it to the Romney secret videos, but it is far, far from it.

And then right is trying to use this as the "black people are the racists" meme, but nowhere in Obama's speech did he mention race. Instead this is another failed attempt by the right wing noise machine to create a false controversy.

If this is all they got now, go ahead and cancel the debates and rest of the presidential race. Obama has won.

GOP Congressional Staffer Accused Of Assaulting Lindsay Lohan

Posted 9/30/12 at 8:09pm by jamie

These guys really get around:

Lindsay Lohan told police she was assaulted in her Manhattan hotel room early Sunday morning by a man she met at a night club, police sources said.

According to law enforcement officials, Lohan told police she got into an argument with a 25-year-old man she brought to her room after meeting him 1 Oak in Chelsea.

The argument was allegedly over photos the man took of Lohan on his cell phone while they were in her 15th floor room at the W Hotel near Union Square with some of Lohan's friends

[SNIP]

LaBella was initially charged Sunday afternoon with assault and harassment, but after further investigation police dropped the assault charge. LaBella has since filed a harassment complaint against Lohan.

According to his YouTube page, LaBella ran for president of his business fraternity at the University of San Diego and was a child actor. In police paperwork, LaBella listed his employer as Illinois Congressman John Shimkus.

“While no one from Congressman Shimkus’ office has been contacted by Mr. LaBella following his arrest, he has been an employee in the Congressman’s Washington office," a spokesman for Rep. Shimkus said in a statement Sunday. "Obviously, the Congressman does not condone his actions. As this is a legal matter for Mr. LaBella, the Congressman nor his office will make further comment.”

It pretty much goes with the entire platform for the GOP when it comes to women...

Mitt Unfit?

Posted 9/29/12 at 11:57am by jamie

Ann Romney is back on the trail for Mitt and she gave a rather bleak assessment to a Nevada radio station this week of what problems might face a President Romney:

Ann Romney's biggest concern if her husband becomes president would be his ability to maintain his "mental well-being," she said in an interview Thursday with KTVN in Reno, Nev.

Asked what her primary worry would be should her husband succeed in defeating President Obama on Nov. 6, Mrs. Romney replied, "You know, I think my biggest concern, obviously, would just be for his mental well-being."

I've been closely following politics since 1988 and this has to be one of the weirdest statements I have ever heard from a potential first lady or even surrogate.

And if Ann if concerned about her husband's "mental well-being", then perhaps she should consult one former President about it. Here's George Bush in a debate against John Kerry in 2004. In this video, Bush tells everyone 11 times how hard it is to be President.

So do we really want a President who might have a breakdown? It's not like we are talking about being the boss of a big company, where you can easily fire people who are against you. We are talking about the President of the United States, where you will have close to half of the country upset with you and replacing administration officials becomes a big deal, not only with the media but also with the Senate.

Regulation Has Lead To Expensive And Slow Internet

Posted 9/25/12 at 7:11pm by jamie

There is a certain points in which government regulation is bad, and this is one of those:

The U.S. has fallen behind much of the Western world when it comes to phone, cable and Internet service. Americans actually pay much more for inferior service compared to their global counterparts.

In his new book, The Fine Print: How Big Companies Use 'Plain English' to Rob You Blind, Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter David Cay Johnston highlights these astounding facts:

  • Americans pay four times as much as the French for an Internet triple-play package—phone, cable TV and Internet—at an average of $160 per month versus $38 per month.
  • The French get global free calling and worldwide live television. Their Internet is also 10 times faster at downloading information and 20 times faster uploading it.
  • America has gone from #1 in Internet speed (when we invented it) to 29th in the world and falling.
  • Bulgaria is among the countries with faster Internet service.
  • Americans pay 38 times as much as the Japanese for Internet data.

Since the mid-1970's when Ma Bell was cited as holding a monopoly over phone service, Americans have been told more competition would lower their phone bill. But the promise of lower prices has actually led to higher prices, says Johnston.

Johnston goes on to lay out the very reasons why we are so bad off:

The telecos got the rules changed while we weren't watching," says Johnston in the accompanying interview. Basically, the phone and cable companies lobbied Washington to change laws and regulations to favor their business over their customers.

And remember the so-called "Information Superhighway"?

Scott Brown's Macaca Moment

Posted 9/25/12 at 5:13pm by jamie

Sen. Scott Brown's staff has been caught on tape ridiculing Elizabeth Warren's Indian heritage:

Staffers for Sen. Scott Brown chanted Indian "war whoops" and made "tomahawk chops" during a rally for the Republican senator this week in Boston.

n a video posted on YouTube, Brown's staffers are seen holding campaign signs near the Erie Pub, chanting and making tomahawk chops, presumably in reference to Elizabeth Warren's claims of Cherokee heritage.

Brown's Deputy Chief of Staff Greg Casey and Constituent Service Counsel Jack Richard, State Director Jerry McDermott, special assistant Jennifer Franks and GOP operative Brad Garnett are pictured in the video, NewsCenter 5's Janet Wu confirmed.

"It is certainly something that I don't condone," said Brown when asked about the video. "The real offense is that (Warren) said she was white and then checked the box saying she is Native American, and then she changed her profile in the law directory once she made her tenure."

No Scott. The real offense is the questioning of anyone's heritage. I have an American Indian grandfather and that does make me American Indian.

But is also goes beyond that. Warren hasn't been using her heritage to try and influence her campaign. Instead Brown made an issue of it because of what her form said. It's the Republicans who want to make skin color, heritage and even religion a litmus test for candidates.

The Romney Healthcare Plan Revealed!

Posted 9/24/12 at 12:11pm by jamie

Have you been to the emergency room lately? Waits are long. Why? Because they have become the doctor's office for the uninsured. Well Mitt Romney thinks that is actually a good idea:

Downplaying the need for the government to ensure that every person has health insurance, Mitt Romney on Sunday suggested that emergency room care suffices as a substitute for the uninsured.

"Well, we do provide care for people who don't have insurance," he said in an interview with Scott Pelley of CBS's "60 Minutes" that aired Sunday night. "If someone has a heart attack, they don't sit in their apartment and die. We pick them up in an ambulance, and take them to the hospital, and give them care. And different states have different ways of providing for that care."

The problem with this approach is the lack of preventive care. People can't go for regular check-ups, so things like blood pressure and cholesterol get out of control. When they finally reach the boiling point, people go to the ER with a full blown heart attack, and now what would have been a cheap visit turns into a very expensive one.

Now this brings us to the second problem - costs. One of the biggest contributors to rising healthcare costs is the uninsured. Hospitals are businesses. Businesses exist to make money. When uninsured people come into the ER and can't pay, the hospital is left with costs. Remember, they still have to pay doctors, technicians, laboratories, specialists, etc. Do the hospitals just eat these costs? No, they absorb them into their overall operational costs, which means higher bills for the insured. Sure you might not really see this, but the insurance companies do and now they need to recoup those costs by increasing your premiums.

Romney's Forced Givings

Posted 9/21/12 at 5:11pm by jamie

Today Mitt Romney released his 2011 tax returns. As soon as he did the right started going on about how much he gives to charity. Here's The Washington Times:

Mitt Romney's presidential campaign is releasing a brief summary of 20 years of tax returns on Friday, and his accountant says it will show he gave 13.45 percent of his adjusted gross income to charities.

That's nearly twice the rate of President Obama, who according to his tax returns from 2000 through 2011 donated just less than 7 percent of his adjusted gross income to charities.

Mr. Romney's campaign did not release his returns, but instead had his trustee, Brad Malt, write a blog post giving some details of returns from 1990 through 2009.

But what are those donations? That's what we don't know.

Well there is one that we do, somewhat know about; his church. The Mormon church requires its members to donate a certain percentage of their income back to the church. Tithing, as it is called, is a somewhat secret part of Mormonism. No one really knows exactly what the requirement is, but it appears to be at least 10% of your income. When you consider that the Mormon church earns an estimated $7 billion a year from this, it leads you to believe many must give more.

So let's go with that 10% that Romney MUST give per his religion and deduct that from his 13.45% that he gave total. That leaves us with Romney giving 3.45%, or a little more than half of what the Obama's gave.

Republican Fear Grows

Posted 9/20/12 at 6:42pm by jamie

It's really bad for Mitt Romney when even John Boehner won't defend him:

Even as he joked "I just hope I survive," House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) declined to defend Mitt Romney's now-infamous 47 percent remarks Thursday, and insisted the Republican ticket can still win.

Boehner wouldn't be joking like that if a little part of him isn't saying that they may lose the House this fall.

Here's something Republicans need to seriously consider. Romney has had one of the most gaffed filled campaigns in modern history. How will his presidency be? If it's the same thing, then come 2016, the Republicans may end up being a long-time minority. In other words, Mitt Romney risks hurting the GOP for years to come.

Are you Republicans ready to take that gamble? Think about that when you go in to vote this year.

Could The Democrats Take It All?

Posted 9/20/12 at 3:11pm by jamie

Following the Democratic convention and Romney's countless failures of late, things are starting to look really good for President Obama's reelection chances. But there maybe even more to celebrate.

Polling out this past week has shown a big shift in the Senate. Currently Nate Silver has the Democrats not only holding the Senate, but also picking up a seat. This is extremely good news and something we want to keep going.

But the good news doesn't stop there. With the big shift towards the left, some are even saying that the House has a good chance of flipping. Here's what Sam Wang of Princeton Election Consortium has to say:

As seen in recent articles in Politico and U.S. News, few pundits think the Democrats will re-take the House. However, analysis of a leading indicator suggests to me that transfer of control is a distinct possibility. With that, I plunge ahead.

And sure enough House polling is showing that this could end up happening.

We're still over a month from Election Day and in political terms that is a lifetime, but if Democrats can keep this momentum going and exposing Romney for the person he really is, then November could turn out really, really good for Democrats.

Glenn Reynolds Goes 50 Shades Of Crazy

Posted 9/16/12 at 12:06pm by jamie

Glenn Reynolds, aka Instapundit, has seriously lost it:

WHY BARACK OBAMA SHOULD RESIGN. Just for the record, this is what it looked like for a man who made a film that made the Obama Administration uncomfortable:

Here’s the key bit: “Just after midnight Saturday morning, authorities descended on the Cerritos home of the man believed to be the filmmaker behind the anti-Muslim movie that has sparked protests and rioting in the Muslim world.”

Glenn Reynolds is a "law professor". You would think that a "law professor" would realize certain things, like you don't omit facts! For example, they were taking the filmmaker in to question him if rather he violated the terms of his probation. Reynolds makes no mention of that. He totally omits the actual reason/motive for this questioning. Talk about irresponsible. If I were Reynold's boss, I would seriously question rather he has the ability to teach the law faithfully.

And it doesn't stop there. Reynolds adds in this part "from a reader":

MORE STILL: Reader Jack Moss writes: “Probation is not a law enforcement function, it’s under the court. If his probation officer wanted to question him about the use of a computer, that broke his probation fine. But that wouldn’t include questions about making an anti-Islamic movie. It’s irrelevant. That means that the FBI showed up outside their jurisdiction for a reason given by their superiors. The question then is who ordered them there.”

Drudge Goes Holy War!

Posted 9/15/12 at 12:25pm by jamie

Here's what you see right now on Drudge:

Get that? The feds are going after a Christian! Talk about bullshit headlines, this one takes the cake.

As you can guess, the filmmaker Drudge is talking about is the one behind that anti-Islam movie that has sparked all the outrage. Here's what the article says:

A Southern California filmmaker linked to an anti-Islamic movie inflaming protests across the Middle East was interviewed by federal probation officers at a Los Angeles sheriff's station but was not arrested or detained, authorities said early Saturday.

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, was interviewed at the station in his hometown of Cerritos, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Deputy Don Walker said.

Federal officials have said they were investigating the activities of Nakoula, who has been convicted of financial crimes. If the probation department determines Nakoula violated terms of his release, a judge could send him back to prison.

Walker said Nakoula traveled voluntarily in a squad car with deputies.

But why are the feds involved?

Is it Obama trying to squash the Christians?

Nope:

The probation department is reviewing the case of Nakoula, who was previously convicted on bank fraud charges and was banned from using computers or the Internet as part of his sentence. The review is aimed at learning whether Nakoula violated the terms of his five-year probation.

Karen Redmond, a spokeswoman for the administrative office of the U.S. courts, confirmed Friday the review is under way.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter