blanche lincoln

A Silver Lining?

Posted 11/3/10 at 8:40am by jamie

3748152908_10c7bd620fIf there is any silver lining to the Democrats losing the House last night, it is this:

In a fell swoop, the once-powerful Blue Dog caucus of conservative House Democrats was reduced from 54 members to 26 in Tuesday’s midterm election.

The caucus lost two members to retirement and two others who ran for higher office, and out of the remaining 50 members, 24 Blue Dogs lost.

There were still a few Blue Dogs in tight races that had yet to be called early on Wednesday morning. There is the potential for more losses, though most of them look likely to hold on.

Add to that the fact that we are now rid of Evan Byah and Blanche Lincoln in the Senate, we are left with something we can better work with. It’s time for us to start focusing on more progressive candidates for these lost Blue Dog seats and work towards 2012.

Indefensible

Posted 6/8/10 at 11:47pm by jamie

Now that Blanche Lincoln has been able to hold onto her job, we are to expect little jabs from the right on how "the progressives lost big tonight". That, despite being untrue, is to be expected, but this is not:

A senior White House official just called me with a very pointed message for the administration's sometime allies in organized labor, who invested heavily in beating Blanche Lincoln, Obama's candidate, in Arkanas.

"Organized labor just flushed $10 million of their members' money down the toiled on a pointless exercise," the official said. "If even half that total had been well-targeted and applied in key House races across this country, that could have made a real difference in November."

Whoever this "administration official" is needs to be fired. Labor makes up a major chunk of the base for the left, and for someone at Obama's White House to make such a statement is in insult and indefensible. Maybe labor will tell the White House that they just flushed a huge chunk of their base?

This is the kind of typical politics that so many of us are tired of, and the kind we had hoped Obama was above. Sadly that hope is dead, unless Obama gets his political act together and get rid of these people.

UPDATE:

The AFL-CIO has fired back:

The American Quest For A New Political Class

Posted 5/19/10 at 9:23am by jamie

Thinking about the results of yesterday’s elections, one thing sticks out to me. America isn’t really anti-incumbent, but rather anti-old school politics.

Let’s start in Kentucky. Rand Paul beat Secretary of State Trey Grayson, making him the GOP candidate for U.S. Senate. Rand Paul doesn’t have a political career like his opponent, but he did have the Tea Party behind him. But I believe there was an equal force behind Paul’s victory. Grayson got a couple kisses of death, one from minority leader Mitch McConnell and a bigger one from Dick Cheney, who is now 0-3 on endorsements.

Then we have the Democratic Senate primary between Arlen Specter and Joe Sestak. Unlike Specter and his 30 years in Senate, Sestak is a relatively new comer to the political stage, only in his third year in Congress. Pennsylvania has always been pretty much a toss-up state, they did give us Rick Santorum after all. But the interesting thing is that Sestak, a rather liberal candidate, has consistently polled much better against his Republican challenger than Specter, to the tune of about 10 points.

Now This Is A Hell Of An Idea

Posted 3/11/10 at 8:25am by jamie

This whole “seniority” thing in the Senate has always been a bunch of garbage and helped contribute to the “good ole’ boys” club mentality that surrounds the chamber. Now it looks like it could be coming to an end:

During a question-and-answer session with progressive media, video blogger Mike Stark asked lawmakers why the Democratic caucus hasn't yanked Sen. Blanche Lincoln's chairmanship of the Agriculture Committee, considering her opposition to Democratic legislative efforts. In Arkansas, her gavel is a top selling point as she battles a progressive primary challenge.

"We're going to elect committee chairs next year," said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). "The current chairs that are sitting there now understand that we'll be electing chairs next year," he added, saying the idea had been cleared with Senate leadership.

Under current rules, members of the caucus can weigh in by objecting to an overall Senate organizing resolution, but don't have an up-or-down vote on each chair.

That’s exactly how it should be. Take Lieberman as an example. The only reason he is still a Democrat is so that he can keep his seniority and have his Homeland Security chairmanship. It doesn’t matter if Jack Bauer himself became a senator, Lieberman would still be chair because of his seniority.

It’s practices like this that have made the Senate a laughing stock of the free world. I’m glad to see talk of ending it. If these people really think they should chair committees, then let them fight for it. It’s time for our senators to prove their worth.

The Problem With National Pushes In Local Races

Posted 1/6/10 at 11:20am by jamie

Bob brings up an excellent point today:

The retirement of Byron Dorgan is a solid example of why, in many cases, legislation is at the mercy of conservative-leaning states, and nothing the president can- or should do will change it.

With Dorgan out, it's very likely that a Republican will win that seat. If Ben Nelson were to resign, he'd probably be replaced by a Republican. Blanche Lincoln is likely to be replaced by a Republican. It goes without saying that those Republicans won't be very receptive to robust public options or passing the Obama agenda.

Progressive groups would be helped to remember one of the greatest quotes given by Tipp O’Neil, “all politics is local”. Let’s go with the example of Blanche Lincoln and Arkansas.

GovTrack ranks Lincoln as a moderate Democrat, something we all know. In 2008 Arkansas went for McCain by +7, so Arkansas is a red state. That pretty much means that Lincoln and Pryor are the most liberal we will get out of Arkansas, unless the state makes a dramatic shift to the left.

This brings us to the point of primaries. A lot of national organizations will be focusing on unseating Lincoln in the primary, a very possible feat, but at what costs? If we end up replacing Lincoln with a more liberal/progressive candidate, will they hold up against the general electorate, which is much more right leaning? Most likely not.

So where does this leave us?

Well Lincoln is out as the Democratic candidate and replaced with someone far more progressive, then we will lose a Senator that votes with the Democrats somewhere along the lines of 30-40% of the time. That will be replaced by a Republican who will vote with Democrats 0-10% of the time. In the long run we will lose.

Another Democratic Senator In Re-Election Trouble

Posted 12/14/09 at 9:28am by jamie

2010 is going to be very ugly for Democrats:

Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet is losing to all three of his Republican challengers, according to a new Rasmussen survey, another sign that 2010 is shaping up to be a very tough year for Democratic incumbents.

Bennet is now the fifth Democratic senator to be trailing Republican opposition in recent public polls, joining Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Sens. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.

When the party totally ignores the will of its base then this is the price they pay. We saw it with the Republicans over the past couple of years and now we’ll see it with the Democrats.

CREW Files Ethics Complain Against McCain

Posted 12/10/09 at 7:55am by jamie

Apparently John McCain decided to use campaign money to put out a robo-call urging passage of his healthcare amendment. Here is the script:

On Monday I introduced the first Republican amendment to the massive health care bill, which would send the bill back to the Senate Finance Committee and stop the Democrats from cutting vital Medicare coverage for our seniors. I need Sen. Blanche Lincoln to join me in this effort. If you agree with me, please go to our website at www.healthcaretaskforce.org and sign a petition to Sen. Lincoln urging her to join my effort to fight a Washington DC government takeover of your health care.

CREW points out that using campaign money for official Senate business is a big no-no and has filed a complaint with the Senate Ethics Committee over it:

CREW’s complaint alleges Sen. McCain violated Senate Rule 38, which prohibits senators from maintaining “unofficial office accounts,” meaning they cannot use private donations to support official senate activities and expenses. By urging voters to call their senators to urge them to support his motion, Sen. McCain was engaged in grassroots lobbying. This activity clearly was related to Sen. McCain's official duties. By using an outside entity’s funds -- those of the NRSC -- to pay for expenses related to his official duties, Sen. McCain violated Senate rules.

Melanie Sloan points out that if McCain wanted to send this message out then he should have used his own money. Apparently McCain either doesn’t believe in the ethics enough, or he didn’t really care about his amendment since he decided to break the rules when he has more than enough money to pay for the calls himself.

Hitting Insurance Execs In The Wallet

Posted 12/4/09 at 6:42pm by jamie

This is something that shouldn’t even be an amendment – it should have been in the bill from the get go:

Senate Democrats will offer an amendment this weekend to curb the pay of executives at health insurance companies that benefit from federal subsidies, fueling the growing feud with the powerful industry.

Sens. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) and Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) have sponsored an amendment that would prohibit health insurance companies from deducting more than $400,000 in executive compensation per individual. The cap would apply to companies that earned 25 percent or more of their income from Americans who buy insurance from government-created exchanges.

I’m sure the GOP will attack this from all angles. Get ready for a weekend of hearing Socialist and Communist over and over again.

1,500 Uninsured Show Up At Clinic And Bill Clinton Gets It Totally Wrong

Posted 11/23/09 at 8:33am by jamie

The health clinic held in Arkansans Saturday saw 1,500 uninsured Arkansans come through to receive care on the very same day Blanche Lincoln was toying with the idea of killing healthcare reform. Here is a video from the event:

But somehow Bill Clinton has totally lost the message on this great endeavor, lead by Keith Olbermann:

Bill Clinton told FDL’s Eve Gittelson that it would be problematic for him to attend a free medical clinic being held in Little Rock, Arkansas tomorrow because MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann had “politicized” the event.” He indicated that some were turning the event into a primary kickoff against Arkansas Sen. Blanche Lincoln.

I guess Clinton has missed the entire healthcare debate, considering it has been nothing but politics. Two-thirds of Arkansans support the public option, yet their senator Blanche Lincoln is dead set against it, totally ignoring the will of the people she was elected to represent. That right there is fodder to turn the event into a anti-Blanche event.

And Then There Was 60

Posted 11/21/09 at 2:50pm by jamie
{{w|Blanche Lincoln}}, U.S. Senator from Arkansas.

Image via Wikipedia

Good news from the Senate on the healthcare front:

WASHINGTON (AP) Sen. Blanche Lincoln says she'll vote 'yes' on health care test vote, giving Democrats 60.

This morning Mary Landrieu said she would also vote yes today. Tonight’s the big vote, so keep an ear out. Things will get really interesting and the fear mongering will go into overdrive.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter