blow job

More Racism From GOP Members

Posted 8/6/07 at 1:06pm by jamie

A big hat tip to Josh for finding this article. Remember that Florida state legislature that got busted last week for soliciting a blow job from a male in a bathroom? Yeah - the family of party values. But it also turns out this gem of the GOP is now using his excuse for the act as being scared of the black man he solicited it from (who was an undercover cop):

State Rep. Bob Allen told police he was just playing along when a undercover officer suggested in a public restroom that the legislator give him oral sex and $20 because he was intimidated, according to a taped statement and other documents released Thursday.

Allen has already denied any wrongdoing, but the recordings and documents offered new details about what he and police say happened on July 11 inside the men's room at Veterans Memorial Park.

"I certainly wasn't there to have sex with anybody and certainly wasn't there to exchange money for it," said Allen, R-Merritt Island, who was arrested on charges of soliciting prostitution.

"This was a pretty stocky black guy, and there was nothing but other black guys around in the park," Allen, who is white, told police in a taped statement after his arrest. Allen said he feared he "was about to be a statistic" and would have said anything just to get away.

Yeah that is a great defense. So this Republican is not just a racist, closet homosexual - he is also down right stupid. Let's hear it again for GOP "family values"!

BREAKING: Bush Commutes Libby's Sentence

Posted 7/2/07 at 5:54pm by jamie

Not a pardon, but rather he commuted the sentence. That means no jail for Scooter. Bush says he felt the punishment was too harsh. So is that saying that lying about a blow job is a worse crime than lying under oath regarding the outing of a CIA agent? It appears so.

Bush just handed the Democrats a great campaign talking point. Only 19% of the people polled believe Libby should have been pardoned (and this is essentially the same). Let's see how Congress reacts to this now.

UPDATE #1

The Muckraker has Bush's statement up. I wonder why he just released a statement and chose not to address the nation? Sounds like the White House knew this would cause a shit storm.

Oh - and if you are ever called before the court, or involved in a legal investigation, go ahead and lie. George Bush sez it's ok. (end sarcasm).

UPDATE #2

Apparently the White House has turned off their phone lines. Sounds like they don't want to listen to the people they work for.

UPDATE #3:

Daily Kos has the reactions up of Democrats here and here. Sounds like it is time for Congress to open a full investigation into the leak and pull Cheney and Bush in to testify. Or is a blow job still more serious?

Oh The Politics Of Crime!

Posted 3/6/07 at 1:34pm by jamie

CNN just reported that White House spokesperson, Dana Perino, was asked about Harry Reid's statement. She quickly turned it around to say that the "Democrats will use this for politics".

I guess it was fine and dandy for the Republicans to use a blow job for politics in the Clinton years, but when it comes to obstructing the investigation of a CIA agent who was outed while discrediting one of the main reasons for the Iraq War, then politics should not be used?

Bull shit!

This case was about politics from day one. The politics involved the White House trying to discredit someone with opposing views. The politics involved the White House being involved in the outing of a CIA agent just so they could sell their case for a war based upon flawed intelligence.

Harry Reid and the Democrats using Scooter for political gain has no consequences. The White House's political game that caused all this has cost over 3,000 American lives and countless Iraqi lives. Someone needs to smack Perino for trying to down play this so much. Who has she lost in the war? Who has Bush and Cheney lost in the war?

Why We Need Answers on the Firing of Prosecutors

Posted 3/1/07 at 2:41pm by jamie

I haven't posted on the firing of the federal prosecutors lately, but there has been some real interesting developments in the case. Yesterday, we received this news:

The controversy flared up early Wednesday afternoon after David Iglesias, the departing U.S. attorney from New Mexico, told McClatchy Newspapers that he believes he was forced out because he refused to speed up an indictment of local Democrats a month before November's congressional elections.

Iglesias said that two members of Congress called separately in mid-October to inquire about the timing of a federal probe of a kickback scheme. They appeared eager, he said, for an indictment to be issued before the elections in order to benefit the Republicans. He refused to name the members of Congress because, he said, he feared retaliation.

All House members from New Mexico denied this, except two. Heather Wilson and Pete Domenci. Today Josh Marshall is hearing that there are quiet a few reporters staking out the offices of Wilson and Domenci. Very interesting in deed (also very troubling - its ok to flex Congressional muscle when it comes to these little political games, yet when wounded soldiers are being treated like shit, Republicans shut up).

The Republicans Quiet Scare Tactic

Posted 10/25/06 at 7:12pm by jamie

Bush's biggest problem is he lives in the past. He doesn't realize this great new thing out there called the "internets" and exactly how powerful it is. Take for example when Bush tries to change his story and then lie about what he previously said:

Oops. Well I am sure that hasn't happened before.

Oh well I guess it has. Our President isn't just incompetent - he is a total moron. With someone this out of touch with reality and such an ambition to lie to the American people, don't we require a Congress that will exercise the Constitutional mandate of oversight? Every single American deserves it. Our forefathers deserve it. Our nation deserves it. In 13 days we can change the course in our Nation and hopefully hold Bush accountable for his (in)actions.

Bush Still Wants His Cronies

Posted 10/6/06 at 12:14pm by jamie

Is the President an idiot? That was the question that caused a bunch of heat when Joe Scarborough asked it a couple of months ago. Well consider Bush's latest signing statement and then do the math:

President Bush this week asserted that he has the executive authority to disobey a new law in which Congress has set minimum qualifications for future heads of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Congress passed the law last week as a response to FEMA's poor handling of Hurricane Katrina. The agency's slow response to flood victims exposed the fact that Michael Brown, Bush's choice to lead the agency, had been a politically connected hire with no prior experience in emergency management.

To shield FEMA from cronyism, Congress established new job qualifications for the agency's director in last week's homeland security bill. The law says the president must nominate a candidate who has ``a demonstrated ability in and knowledge of emergency management" and ``not less than five years of executive leadership."

Bush signed the homeland-security bill on Wednesday morning. Then, hours later, he issued a signing statement saying he could ignore the new restrictions. Bush maintains that under his interpretation of the Constitution, the FEMA provision interfered with his power to make personnel decisions.

So Bush wants to be able to hire another Michael Brown to head FEMA. A smart man would take Congress' advice and make sure that the person they hire is qualified for the job. Not in Bush's mind. I guess since he is not a smart man, then he must be an idiot.

While Trying To Impeach Clinton - Foley Was On The Prowl

Posted 10/5/06 at 3:55pm by jamie

This shows you what the Republican controlled House is really all about:

An Atlanta man told a local television station and newspaper that former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley (news, bio, voting record) sent him sexually suggestive messages after he served as a congressional page 10 years ago.

Tyson Vivyan, 26, of Buckhead told WAGA-TV in a Wednesday interview that Foley began sending him instant messages about a month or two after his nine-month stint as a page ended in June 1997

Vivyan told the station that when he was a congressional page in 1996 and 1997 he barely spoke to Foley. But after he left the program - when he was 17 years old - Vivian says they had contact via e-mail about things he says where inappropriate.

"He somehow got ahold of my online identity on AOL and began sending me sexually illicit ims," Vivyan said in the TV interview.

Vivyan said he became upset when he learned that the messages were from Foley.

I wonder how Foley got this guy's AOL screen name? Sounds almost skalerish if you ask me. Oh but Clinton getting a blow job from an adult was more important.

How A Democratic Strategist Should Respond

Posted 10/2/06 at 6:48pm by jamie

This should be required viewing and training for all DNC Strategists from here on out. This was awesome (h/t Christy)

The Republicans want to try and put out the ethics problems involving Democrats, but the fact of the matter is there are only a handful. They can name 3 or 4 and we can respond with 30 or 40. The problems within the Republican party are at least 10 fold compared to that of the Democrat party. Why is that? Could is be that the Republicans find no need for oversight? Dennis Hastert and Tom Delay kept the Ethics Committee from doing their job for over a year and look what happened. The Republican controlled House and Senate REFUSE to question any activity in the White House and look what has happened there - you got one ex-official in jail (Safavian) and one going on trial (Libby).

White House Won't Share Domestic Spying Documents

Posted 2/2/06 at 5:34am by jamie

Hmm does this really shock anyone? From this morning's

New York Times
:

The Bush administration is rebuffing requests from members of the Senate
Judiciary Committee for its classified legal opinions on President Bush's
domestic spying program, setting up a confrontation in advance of a hearing
scheduled for next week, administration and Congressional officials said
Wednesday.

The Justice Department is balking at the request so far, administration
officials said, arguing that the legal opinions would add little to the
public debate because the administration has already laid out its legal
defense at length in several public settings.

Article continues

here.

Well hopefully yesterday's events will help form what happens here. The White
House refused to turn over documents on the response to Katrina. Of course they
were claiming "executive privilege".

The GAO comes out
with a report faulting the White House and Homeland
Security for the response. Perhaps the same will come out of this. The White
House won't turn over documents and once again the White House will be proven in
the wrong. Of course it pisses me off to no end that the Republicans had no
problem at all issuing subpoenas about Clinton's blow job yet issues of our
constitution and our response to disasters they won't even consider that power.

Mum On Katrina

Posted 1/25/06 at 3:06pm by jamie

Since the hurricane season is in limbo right now, you would think it is the
perfect time to hunker down and fix the problems that were exposed during
Katrina. Unfortunately the White House doesn't feel the same way:

The Bush administration, citing the confidentiality of executive branch
communications, said Tuesday that it did not plan to turn over certain
documents about Hurricane Katrina or make senior White House officials
available for sworn testimony before two Congressional committees
investigating the storm response.

The White House this week also formally notified Representative Richard
H. Baker, Republican of Louisiana, that it would not support his legislation
creating a federally financed reconstruction program for the state that
would bail out homeowners and mortgage lenders. Many Louisiana officials
consider the bill crucial to recovery, but administration officials said the
state would have to use community development money appropriated by
Congress.

The White House's stance on storm-related documents, along with slow or
incomplete responses by other agencies, threatens to undermine efforts to
identify what went wrong, Democrats on the committees said Tuesday.

"There has been a near total lack of cooperation that has made it
impossible, in my opinion, for us to do the thorough investigation that we
have a responsibility to do," Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, Democrat of
Connecticut, said at Tuesday's hearing of the Senate committee investigating
the response. His spokeswoman said he would ask for a subpoena for documents
and testimony if the White House did not comply.

Article continues

here

Will We Get The Committee Report Today?

Posted 11/14/05 at 2:34pm by jamie

Two weeks ago tomorrow was when Democrats shut down senate in order to get
answers about the intelligence committees phase two report. That is the second
part of the report that looks into the intelligence leading up to the war in
Iraq. During that closed session, it was agreed upon that a committee be formed
including three Senators from each side of the aisle. They were to act as a over
site into Sen. Pat Robert's committee and find out why the report has not been
completed. Today is the deadline for that committee to report back.

Now I am sitting here wondering if we will actually hear back from that
committee today, or if it will just be forgotten like phase two was. If that is
the case then perhaps another ballsy move by Harry Reid is in order. The
American people deserve to know and are demanding to know the truth. We want to
know if the President lied, manipulated the intelligence, or disposed of key
intelligence so he could promote this invasion. With over 2,000 soldiers dead it
is not just our right to know, it is our duty as citizens and voters to know the
truth.

I will be following C-Span closely today to see if anything comes out on this
story. Hopefully we will start hearing the truth but I won't hold my breath. It
seems as though there are too many important questions that still need to be
answered and those answers will only come from the President and vice-President
and they must be under oath. If a blow job can be important enough to make a
President swear on the Bible to tell the truth then A war certainly is.

Bush Appoints Himself

Posted 9/6/05 at 7:51pm by jamie

Bush has made an appointment to head the investigation into
what went wrong with last week’s response to Katrina. The head of this
investigation is none other than the President himself, leaving one to wonder
the kind of conflict of interest that lies in that decision.

One of the critical components that failed was FEMA’s
response. It is a failure that is widely known and talked about. The failure
lies within its leader Michael Brown, who before his appointment was unemployed.
Why was he unemployed? He was fired from his former job, head of the
International Arabian Horse Association for supervision failures. Crooks and
Liars
has more on that story.

This past week’s lessons are simple – we can not allow
partisanship to come in the way of corrective action. The failure we all
witnessed is something that could directly affect any citizen of this country
and it is an outrage.

Bush investigating a failure in his administration? Why not
just let Karl Rove investigate the Valerie Plame leak or Bill Clinton could have
investigated the blow job in the oval office. This failure needs NON
PARTISANSHIP attention. The President will surely fail to meet that most
important criterion.

Bush has already made it known that he doesn’t feel there
is a failure in his administration, so he will be looking to point blame at
those in the lower levels of government. When an entire system breaks down, you
don’t blame the entire team, you blame the coach.

This is an outrage of epic proportions.

Bill Clinton to the Rescue

Posted 7/13/05 at 12:09am by jamie

In 1992 when Bill Clinton became our President, he was
faced with a load of problems. The top two were a budget that was in a record
deficit and dealing with a post cold war world. While dodging almost every kind
of bullet the right shot at him, he succeeded in both.

It’s no secret the right had to go on the offensive and
start attacking him with everything from “shady” real estate deals right down to
a blow job. They went as far as voting for impeachment because of the President
lying under oath and committing perjury, something that Karl Rove may have done
and the right now views as a minor crime.

Now Reuters is reporting that Bill Clinton is holding a
private summit this September in order to deal with the woes that are facing
this world. They include everything from terrorism to poverty.

Here is the entire article as published via Yahoo and can
be viewed
here:

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton says he is intent on
finding ways the private sector can solve some of the world's most pressing
problems from poverty to terrorism.

As host of a meeting in New York later this year of private
and public sector leaders, Clinton said in an interview with Reuters on Tuesday
there are plenty of problems governments simply cannot address.

"What I'm trying to do is figure out what private sector
people can do," said Clinton, 58, who left office in 2001 after eight years in
the White House which saw the longest-ever U.S. economic expansion but were
dogged by personal scandal.

"It's unrealistic to think all the world's problems will be
solved only by government actions," he said at his home in suburban New York.

A Plea From A Broken Nation

Posted 6/26/05 at 1:38am by jamie

Here we are on another Saturday evening in America. Some people are out
having Barbeques, while others maybe out for a night on the town. I myself am
sitting at home relaxing to some television and wondering what the Times of
London may have in store tomorrow.

It has become almost a weekly event that some new, secret British document
gets leaked to the Times showing more proof that we may not have needed a war in
Iraq at this time. The country we fought to leave because of a lying ruler now
has their own Deep Throat proving wrong doing in their government and also in
ours. If these documents lead to any investigation under our Republican run
Congress is something yet to be seen, but one thing is for certain – the media
has finally awoken.

We are seeing more and more coverage from the press on the Downing Street
Memos and questions are starting to be asked more about the validity of the
facts within them. Our administration has, what would seem to be, an guilt
ridden muzzle on it. Scott McClellan, whenever asked about the memos, always
responds with his predetermined answer of “this is an old matter that has
already been addressed numerous times”. Ironically he won’t readdress it as what
could be a hope to make reporters drop the questioning; he just goes back to
that old statement on a daily basis. This is something that reeks of guilt.

When President Bush originally took office in 2000, he said he wanted to
return accountability to our government. This was a continual campaign point of
his as he ran against former vice-President Al Gore. They were riding on the
coattails of that hideous scandal of Bill Clinton getting a blow job, and the
ride stopped on Pennsylvania Avenue.

Scandals, Spin and Republicans - Oh My!!

Posted 6/7/05 at 4:04am by jamie

One of our countries darkest hours has been rekindled.
Last week we learned the secret identity of a man who led to the downfall of an
American President. Mark Felt, the former second in command of the FBI broke his
thirty year silence and exposed himself as the famous “Deep Throat”.

Ironically this comes at a time when news of scandals
amongst Republicans seems to be as common as insurgent attacks in Iraq. This is
another thorn the Republican Party does not need. As if the Republican spin
machine hasn’t been already been in high gear trying to downplay the Downing
Street Memo, and Tom Delay’s alleged ethics violations, now it must go into
overtime. The Republicans must spin harder than ever and make Americans stop
thinking about Watergate.

It is no shock that we are seeing an onslaught of Nixon
supporters. They are coming out of the wood work defending Nixon’s involvement
in the Watergate Scandal. They are even going as far as to say Mark Felt
committed a treasonous act by releasing his information to the Washington Post.

Now take into consideration the scandalous Bill Clinton.
This is a man that the Republican Party has worked hard to demonize. Bill
Clinton, while serving as President of the United States, did the unthinkable.
He had an extra marital affair in the White House. To make matters even worse he
denied it under oath, something that led to a vote of impeachment against him.

That is why we should support Nixon. After all he was
never impeached; he stood down before Congress had the chance to. And Richard
Nixon did not do anything as unthinkable as getting a blow job from an intern.
No he just participated in some late night meetings organizing the breaking into
of the opponent’s party headquarters.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter