bush and cheney

White House Fires Back At Cheney

Posted 12/30/09 at 4:37pm by jamie

Can we have more of this please?

There are numerous other such public statements that explicitly state we are at war. The difference is this: President Obama doesn’t need to beat his chest to prove it, and – unlike the last Administration – we are not at war with a tactic (“terrorism”), we at war with something that is tangible: al Qaeda and its violent extremist allies. And we will prosecute that war as long as the American people are endangered.

That is exactly the right statement to make. Cheney and Bush used terrorism as a political game, instead of taking it seriously. For proof of that look no further than Afghanistan. We need to remind the American people that the President, the very one that Cheney is accusing of being “weak on terrorism”, has expanded the war on terrorism after Bush and Cheney ignored the real front line for years so they could launch a pet-project called Iraq.

People also need to be reminded that chances are the co-conspirators of the Christmas day attempt were released from Gitmo under the Bush administration, and there is a big chance that they became much more radicalized (or maybe even just became radicalized) while in Gitmo. We have seen a serious trend of this happening in the past and the Bush administration chose to ignore it. They turned Gitmo into a terrorist factory, which is why it needs shut down.

Biden Less Popular Than Cheney?

Posted 10/27/09 at 10:21am by jamie

That’s the meme the wingnuts are trying to spin right now, following the lead of Byron York:

Vice President Joe Biden's favorable rating has fallen to 42 percent in a new Gallup poll, down from a high of 59 percent just after last year's election. Biden's unfavorable rating in the new poll is 40 percent, up from 29 percent last November. (Eighteen percent of those surveyed say they have no opinion of Biden.)

Biden's average favorable rating during his time in office so far is 45 percent -- well below the average 65 percent favorable rating for Vice President Dick Cheney during Cheney's first year in office. Vice President Al Gore's favorable rating during his first year, 55 percent, was also higher than Biden's. (Gallup did not measure vice presidential popularity before Gore.)

This really isn’t that shocking. Biden hasn’t been front and center on a lot of stuff. We just went from a period of imperial vice-presidencies, lead by Cheney, to returning the office back to it’s constitutionally intended place.

What’s really interesting though is how York finishes his post:

Finally, there is a greater gap between Biden's favorable rating and President Obama's than there was between Cheney and President George W. Bush and Gore and President Bill Clinton. Biden's 45 percent average favorable rating this year is well below Obama's average of 63 percent. Cheney's 65 percent average was near Bush's average of 69 percent, and Gore's 55 percent rating was close to Clinton's average of 57 percent.

Change Has Come #4

Posted 1/22/09 at 1:16pm by jamie

No more secrets!

On his first day in office, President Obama put former president Bush on notice. His administration just released an executive order that will make it difficult for Bush to shield his White House records--and those of former Vice President Dick Cheney--from public scrutiny by invoking the doctrine of executive privilege. Shortly after taking office, Bush handed down his own executive order, amending the Presidential Records Act to give current and past presidents, along with their heirs, veto power over the release of presidential records, which are considered the property of the American people.

"[Obama]'s putting former presidents on notice that if you want to continue a claim of executive privilege that [Obama] doesn't think is well-placed, you're going to have to go to court," says Anne Weismann, the chief counsel for Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW).

This one could really turn out to be fun down the road. I can only imagine what is going through Bush and Cheney’s minds right now.

Problem Solved?

Posted 1/21/09 at 11:35am by jamie

Last night President (shiver) Obama ordered the prosecutors at Gitmo to halt all cases for 120 days. Most likely this is so he can figure out what to do with the inmates and finally close down the black eye of the beacon of freedom.

One of the big arguments about Obama closing down Gitmo is what to do with all the inmates. Well we might have a solution now:

Switzerland is ready to consider taking in detainees from the U.S. prison for terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba if that helps to shut it down, the Swiss government said on Wednesday.

"For Switzerland, the detention of people in Guantanamo is in conflict with international law. Switzerland is ready to consider how it can contribute to the solution of the Guantanamo problem," the government said in a statement.

Switzerland said it welcomed the expressed intention of U.S. President Barack Obama to close the prison and would investigate security and legal implications of possibly taking in detainees. About 255 men are still held there.

Help from the world. That’s something we haven’t seen in a very long time. It’s a sign of the change that is coming and the hope and optimism Obama has given the world. Of course I got a better idea for the detainees. Send them to live with Bush and Cheney.

The AP's Take On Feingold

Posted 7/22/07 at 10:01pm by jamie

As all have probably heard by now, Russ Feingold said he is introducing resolutions to censure Bush and Cheney. That is a great move, even though it isn't impeachment. Still, let's see how the AP reports this:

Liberal Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold said Sunday he wants Congress to censure President Bush for his management of the Iraq war and his "assault" against the Constitution.

But Feingold's own party leader in the Senate showed little interest in the idea. An attempt in 2006 by Feingold to censure Bush over the warrantless spying program attracted only three co-sponsors.

Feingold, a prominent war critic, said he soon plans to offer two censure resolutions — measures that would amount to a formal condemnation of the Republican president.

Now I am not trying to say Liberal is a bad word, but I find it interesting how the AP decided to throw it in there. Of course there are Democrats who are against it, but they will be dealt with the next time they run for office. We need action out of the Senate now. What has been happening isn't cutting it.

Dictatorship!

Posted 7/20/07 at 7:55am by jamie

According to former Reagan official Paul Craig Roberts, that is exactly where this country is at now.

Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran.

Bush has put in place all the necessary measures for dictatorship in the form of "executive orders" that are triggered whenever Bush declares a national emergency. Recent statements by Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff, former Republican senator Rick Santorum and others suggest that Americans might expect a series of staged, or false flag, "terrorist" events in the near future.

Many attentive people believe that the reason the Bush administration will not bow to expert advice and public opinion and begin withdrawing US troops from Iraq is that the administration intends to rescue its unpopular position with false flag operations that can be used to expand the war to Iran.

This entire article deserves a good reading.

Robert's article came out on July 16. On July 17th, Bush signed a new Executive Order. Raw Story gives us this synopsis:

Thom Hartmann began his program on Thursday by reading from a new Executive Order which allows the government to seize the assets of anyone who interferes with its Iraq policies.

Oh The Politics Of Crime!

Posted 3/6/07 at 1:34pm by jamie

CNN just reported that White House spokesperson, Dana Perino, was asked about Harry Reid's statement. She quickly turned it around to say that the "Democrats will use this for politics".

I guess it was fine and dandy for the Republicans to use a blow job for politics in the Clinton years, but when it comes to obstructing the investigation of a CIA agent who was outed while discrediting one of the main reasons for the Iraq War, then politics should not be used?

Bull shit!

This case was about politics from day one. The politics involved the White House trying to discredit someone with opposing views. The politics involved the White House being involved in the outing of a CIA agent just so they could sell their case for a war based upon flawed intelligence.

Harry Reid and the Democrats using Scooter for political gain has no consequences. The White House's political game that caused all this has cost over 3,000 American lives and countless Iraqi lives. Someone needs to smack Perino for trying to down play this so much. Who has she lost in the war? Who has Bush and Cheney lost in the war?

Divide Iraq?

Posted 7/22/06 at 12:55am by jamie

Perhaps there is some other good for Bush with the current crisis between Lebanon and Israel. That good could be the media taking some focus off of Iraq. Perhaps that is why this story hasn't had much play today:

Bombs killed two worshippers at mosques in Iraq during Friday prayers and the authorities extended a daytime curfew on Baghdad after one of the bloodiest weeks this year.

On the eve of a high-profile meeting intended to demonstrate reconciliation among sectarian and ethnic factions ahead of a White House visit by the prime minister, senior leaders admitted to despair about the chances of averting all-out civil war.

"Iraq as a political project is finished," a top government official told Reuters -- anonymously because the coalition of Shi'ite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki remains committed in public to a U.S.-sponsored constitution preserving Iraq's unity.

"The parties have moved to Plan B," the official said, saying Sunni, ethnic Kurdish and majority Shi'ite blocs were looking at ways to divide power and resources and to solve the conundrum of Baghdad's mixed population of seven million.

"There is serious talk of Baghdad being divided into east and west," said the official, who has long been a proponent of the present government's objectives. "We are extremely worried."

This is a very significant development in the country. It will be interesting to see how the politics of this plays out if more of Iraq's government moves towards the "plan B". It will ultimately signal an even bigger defeat for Bush and his plans while creating another nation in the Middle East that will most likely be hostile towards us.

Something Not Talked About With Libby

Posted 4/8/06 at 1:30pm by jamie

With everyone paying attention to Bush and his now known involvement in the CIA leak case, one thing has been overlooked - what impact this revelation has on Libby's defense. Today the Washington Post looks at that angle:

Fitzgerald argued, in essence, that the White House effort to rebut Wilson's criticism was so intense, and so preoccupying, that Libby could not have forgotten what he said about Plame. Fitzgerald also noted that Plame's employment was specifically raised as a relevant matter by Cheney, who had directed Libby to disclose information from the NIE.

Lawyers who have been closely following the case offered contrasting views of the impact Fitzgerald's allegations would have on Libby's defense.

Republican lawyer and former federal prosecutor Joseph E. diGenova said "it is not material in any way to what he charged, which is perjury." But Richard A. Sauber, a lawyer who represents Time magazine's Matthew Cooper, one of the reporters who wrote about Plame after talking to Libby, said "the whole thing undercuts Libby's defense that he was too busy on other things" to recall the Plame matter.

"You cannot say that it is unimportant and something you forgot" when the president and vice president were directly involved in a related issue, Sauber said.

This is an interesting observation I am inclined to agree with the assessment given by Sauber. Libby is a smart man and had to know that there was a high probability of a major fallout from this disclosure. When you have the President and vice-President involved in such a decision, you are not going to forget it.

Something else interesting this article shows is that the timeline of events for the declassification of the NIE (National Intelligence Estimate):

More Pre-War Lying By Bush

Posted 3/2/06 at 6:56pm by jamie

Murray Waas has exposed a new hole in the pre-war intelligence in his latest article.

The first report, delivered to Bush in early October 2002, was a one-page summary of a National Intelligence Estimate that discussed whether Saddam's procurement of high-strength aluminum tubes was for the purpose of developing a nuclear weapon.

Among other things, the report stated that the Energy Department and the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research believed that the tubes were "intended for conventional weapons," a view disagreeing with that of other intelligence agencies, including the CIA, which believed that the tubes were intended for a nuclear bomb.  

First we find out that the "Mushroom cloud" story told on MTP by Cheney was actually a manufactured story by the administration. Now we find out that Bush and Cheney knew the aluminum tubes were not for nuclear weapons. The pile of lies by the administration is piling up quick and something needs to be done now.

Cheney Rolling Over?

Posted 10/18/05 at 3:35am by jamie

According to
Raw
Story
it very well could be the case :

New York Daily News source believes
senior White House official has flipped in leak case

10/17/2005 @ 9:54 pm Filed by RAW STORY

The case of outed CIA agent Valerie Plame is set to explode.

Advertisement The New York Daily News is set to report in Tuesday
editions that a well-placed source interviewed by the newspaper believes a
senior White House official has flipped and may be helping the prosecutor in
the case, RAW STORY has learned.

The Daily News will reveal that a top source believes that based on the
questioning of Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and his other contacts
with the investigation, someone in the White House has turned.

All eyes are on Dick Cheney, the News says, as the investigation wraps
up
.

The piece follows on the heels of on a story by Bloomberg News and an
article by RAW STORY last week confirming that the prosecutor is probing the
Vice President.

Also under a microscope is the White House Iraq Group, an ad-hoc strategy
group started by Bush chief of staff Andrew Card aimed at selling the war in
Iraq.

Extending The Plame Investigation Longer?

Posted 10/13/05 at 1:11am by jamie

A source close to the Plame case is saying that Fitzgerald met alone with
Judge Hogan yesterday, presumably to ask for an extension of the Grand Jury.

That is a posting from

Firegodlake Blog
.

This could very well be the case. From all reports, the investigation is
taking complicated twists and turns. Fitzgerald is reportedly looking more into
the pre-war Iraq intel and where it came from, and more involvement of Bush and
Cheney officials is being assumed.

If Fitzgerald does end up with an extension, it will surely send a sign that
he has a case in the works. The judge is the one to decide upon an extension,
and if the judge feels all evidence and testimonies thus far have yielded enough
proof that a crime was possibly committed, then he would be more out to grant an
extension. If there is not enough of a case to merit charges, then the judge
would not grant an extension. The decision that comes out of this will
definitely set the stage for the future findings of this case.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter