coincidence

Wingnut Media War

Posted 9/27/10 at 3:03pm by jamie

Oh this is really good.

As you probably recall, many Republicans and conservatives who surely knew better got carried away with outrage when the Daily Caller published its thorougly bogus series of hit pieces alleging that Journolist represented some kind of shadowy liberal conspiracy to undermine our journalistic insitutions from within for the good of the Democratic Party.

So it's pretty funny to see that Daily Caller has now turned its indefatigable investigative reporters loose on Eric Cantor and the National Review.

Last week, the Daily Caller alleged that according to two "high level Republican sources," that much-discussed National Review editorial hailing the boldness of the GOP Pledge to America had been "prearranged" with senior GOP aides. The National Review is adamantly denying the claim. But Daily Caller editor Tucker Carlson is now doubling down:

Not so fast. In addition to the two trusted sources who spoke on background to Ward, we have evidence that there was in fact coordination between National Review and Congressman Cantor's office. We know that GOP leadership aides were aware of, and excited by, National Review's editorial before it was published. We know that the piece was posted online just minutes prior to the start of the Wednesday evening caucus meeting, yet somehow aides were ready with copies to pass out to members. A coincidence? Please.

Nothing like a little infighting to ring in the election season!

What The GOP Doesn't Want You To Hear

Posted 9/22/10 at 11:04am by jamie

trickle-down A very interesting op-ed in today’s LA Times starts with:

Congress should let the Bush tax cuts expire for the wealthiest Americans and use the additional tax revenues that are generated to invest in infrastructure and research.

Now you probably think this is some whack, socialistic liberal or something. Of course you would be wrong. This piece is written by Garrett Gruener, a venture capitalist and founder of ask.com.

Gruener brings up some very interesting facts, you know, those pesky little things the GOP tries to deny. Here’s one that really sticks out:

The supply-side, trickle-down economic policies of the last decade benefitted people like me, but the wealth didn't trickle down. So while we did quite well, people who live from paycheck to paycheck didn't.

When inequality gets too far out of balance, as it did over the course of the last decade, the wealthy end up saving too much while members of the middle class can't afford to spend much unless they borrow excessively. Eventually, the economy stalls for lack of demand, and we see the kind of deflationary spiral we find ourselves in now. I believe it is no coincidence that the two highest peaks in American income inequality came in 1929 and 2008, and that the following years were marked by low economic activity and significant unemployment.

Bachmann’s Latest Insult Back Fires

Posted 4/29/09 at 11:09am by jamie

The dipshit of Minnesota is back in the news. Here’s the one and only Michele Bachmann:

BACHMANN: I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out then under Democrat President Jimmy Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it is an interesting coincidence.

But as Think Progress points out, that outbreak in the 70’s happened in February of 1976, when Republican Gerald Ford was President.

Bachmann is trying to turn this possible pandemic into a political game with totally wrong facts. That’s what happens when she tries to play with the big kids.

Budget Cutting: "The War On Drugs"

Posted 11/12/08 at 8:44am by jamie

Now that we have a Democrat taking over 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. and Democrats controlling Congress, can we look at a serious budget cut? I'm of course talking about the bullshit "war on drugs". So far this year our governments (federal and state) have spent close to $44 billion on this never ending war. It's like the "war on terror" in the sense that it is a war that can not be won.

A good starting point would be to go ahead and legalize marijuana. Marijuana is healthier than cigarettes and with our dying economy, could provide a big boost in the way of manufacturing and taxing. We need to face that fact that doing drugs doesn't make someone a loser in life. If you think so, then here is a nice list of people who have used drugs in the past and still went on to greatness, including our new President.

Let's also think about the savings of incarcerating people for drug use. If people weren't locked up for smokin' a doob, then we wouldn't spend tens of thousands per year to house them in prison, just so they go out there and do it again.

America has the highest incarceration rate of any country in the world. We also have the some of the toughest drug laws in the world. Coincidence? I don't think so. So please President Obama, Majority Leader Reid and Speak Pelosi, let's start looking at this huge sinker tied around the neck of the American tax payer and rid ourselves of it once and for all. If we learned anything from prohibition it's that it didn't work.

Coincidence?

Posted 8/4/08 at 1:18pm by jamie

The "God Hates Fags" idiots of Westboro Church, lead by Fred Phelps, had thousands of dollars in damage caused by a fire this weekend:

Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka, Kansas, known for its vocal condemnations of homosexuality, website GodHatesFags.com and picketing of gay pride parades and funerals, has sustained thousands of dollars in damage after a fire early Saturday morning. Impromptu protest followed as firefighters carried out their response.

"None of what they do is going to stop us from delivering our message," said church counsel Shirley Phelps-Roper of any "cowards" that would have set the fire on purpose, also saying that it was the "most aggressive act" towards the Phelps family to date.

Couldn't happen to nicer people, but look at this item from April:

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Richard D. Bennett placed a lien on the properties of the church and its founder, Fred W. Phelps Sr., and ordered two of Phelps’ daughters to post cash bonds of $125,000 and $100,000 within 30 days.

Bennett also placed a lien on a $232,900 office building owned by Phelps and his wife that the family law firm uses. The liens mean that no new mortgages can be taken out on the properties, and no money can be borrowed against the equity in them. Bennett noted that it would require “extraordinary circumstances” for the church to avoid posting a portion of the judgment.

I hope fire investigators are looking at this very closely. Phelps is already blaming gays and judges for the fire.

McCain Sends Jobs Over Seas To A Company His "Advisers" Lobbied For

Posted 3/11/08 at 9:18am by jamie

Really - this isn't just a coincidence:

Top current advisers to Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign last year lobbied for a European plane maker that beat Boeing to a $35 billion Air Force tanker contract, taking sides in a bidding fight that McCain has tried to referee for more than five years.

Two of the advisers gave up their lobbying work when they joined McCain's campaign. A third, former Texas Rep. Tom Loeffler, lobbied for the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. while serving as McCain's national finance chairman.

Last week I posted that McCain was a key figure behind the contracts going overseas, instead of to Boeing, which would have supported and created 44,000 new American jobs. Now will the media stop coddling their golden child and start investigating his ties to these lobbyists, and if those ties cost America 44,000 jobs? 

Iraq And Plamegate Now Part Of The Missing Emails

Posted 1/19/08 at 9:30am by jamie

When it looks like these missing emails may have altered other investigations then it is time for a criminal probe into it:

Apparent gaps in White House e-mail archives coincide with dates in late 2003 and early 2004 when the administration was struggling to deal with the CIA leak investigation and the possibility of a congressional probe into Iraq intelligence failures.

Here is where the Plame case may come into play in this:

Among the times for which e-mail may not have been archived from Vice President Dick Cheney's office are four days in early October 2003, just as a federal probe was beginning into the leak of Valerie Plame's CIA identity, an inquiry that eventually ensnared Cheney's chief of staff.

Pretty convenient that emails would happen to be missing from those four days, and Melanie Sloan seems to concur:

Democrats Trying to Put the Brakes on Bush's Rewriting of History

Posted 3/15/07 at 9:08am by jamie

Funny how Bush always says that the historian's will judge him in the future and they will judge him as being a great leader and visionary. What makes it so funny is the fact that during his first year in office (two months after 9/11) he issued an executive order protecting Presidential records:

Overturning the Bush Executive Order. Under the Presidential Records Act, presidential records are supposed to be released to historians and the public 12 years after the end of a presidential administration. In November 2001, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13233 which overturned an executive order issued by President Reagan and gave current and former presidents and vice presidents broad authority to withhold presidential records or delay their release indefinitely. The Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2007 would nullify the Bush executive order and establish procedures to ensure the timely release of presidential records.

Transparency in government -eh? Looks like the Democrats are trying to get rid of that protection Bush has put in. Yesterday the amendments passed 333-93 in the House. During the debate yesterday Henry Waxman gave a great reason why this bill is so important:

What is interesting about this is that one other President tried to stop these records from being released. That President was Nixon. Pretty interesting coincidence there.

 Now the question remains if Bush will sign this into law or issue a signing statement saying that he doesn't have to follow it. We learn from our past - a concept Bush doesn't understand.

Forbes Magazine Attacks Bloggers - Coincidence?

Posted 10/29/05 at 6:04am by jamie

If you first read the cover story that appears on the November 14 issue of
Forbes magazine
you may think its just a typical article from a publication
that caters to the business community. Further reading into it reveals something
even more disturbing to people like me and other bloggers out there.

The article attacks bloggers around the country. It focuses on some of the
isolated incidents where blogs were used to attack companies or individuals.
Some of the attacks have actually been based on fact and there are some that are
based on lies.

One of the key victims of this attack is Google who hosts the very service
this blog is on.

But even the Constitution doesn't give a citizen the right to unjustly
call his neighbor a child molester. Google and the like argue they bear no
more responsibility for content than a phone company does for slander over
its wires. But Google's blog business looks less like a phone company and
more like a mix of reality TV and an online magazine. Bloggers provide the
fare, and Google maintains it for them free of charge, sometimes selling
ads.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter