congress

Democrats Still Have Stronger Support From The Public

Posted 9/23/09 at 8:50am by jamie

The new NBC poll has a little bit of good news for the Democrats. When asked how they approve the Democrats in Congress, here is how they respond:

demapprovnbc

They get a net positive of 42, as compared to the Republicans, who have a net positive of only 28:

repaprovnbc

But when it comes to Afghanistan, the President is looking at growing public opposition:

afghannbc

So if the Democrats show strong opposition to President Obama on Afghanistan then that could turn out to help them next fall. So expect to see a rather public fight when it comes to Afghanistan in the coming weeks.

Veto This Health Care Bill

Posted 9/8/09 at 10:56pm by jamie

Max Baucus, lap lizard for the insurance industry, has come up with his own plan:

Just as auto coverage is now mandatory, so would a requirement that all Americans get health insurance. Penalties for failing to get insurance would start at $750 a year for individuals and $1,500 for families. Households making more than three times the federal poverty level — about $66,000 for a family of four — would face the maximum fines. For families, it would be $3,800, and for individuals, $950.

If this some how passes through Congress then President Obama must veto it. He campaigned against mandates, and that is exactly what Baucus wants. This plan doesn’t fix health care for the public, it just gives the insurance companies a very huge Christmas present.

Go After Them!

Posted 8/24/09 at 8:10am by jamie

Today is the day that the “holy grail” report of prisoner abuse is supposed to be released, highlighting torture techniques used at Gitmo. So far the leaked details have been very disturbing.

On the heels of this release we also find out that a Justice Department report is suggesting to open/reopen a bunch of investigations:

The Justice Department’s ethics office has recommended reversing the Bush administration and reopening nearly a dozen prisoner-abuse cases, potentially exposing Central Intelligence Agency employees and contractors to prosecution for brutal treatment of terrorism suspects, according to a person officially briefed on the matter.

The recommendation by the Office of Professional Responsibility, presented to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in recent weeks, comes as the Justice Department is about to disclose on Monday voluminous details on prisoner abuse that were gathered in 2004 by the C.I.A.’s inspector general but have never been released.

All I can say is “its about time”, and hopefully the administration and Congress will follow suit. The excuse that we “must look forward” is one of the weakest I have ever heard. Imagine the police saying that on murder investigations.

Can Democrats At Least Act Like Leaders?

Posted 6/26/09 at 9:14am by jamie

Childish crap like this helps no one:

After the House floor had largely cleared following a series of votes, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) and Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) split apart from a heated conversation and began yelling at one another.
“You’re out of line,” Waters shot while walking down toward the well.
“You’re out of line,” Obey shot back before turning and walking away.
But then Obey stopped, turned back toward Waters, and shouted: “I’m not going to approve that earmark!”
Obey turned away, but Waters went to go huddle with members of the Congressional Black Caucus. She could be over heard telling them: “He touched me first.”

Yes passions can fly in Congress, but this is ridiculous. And what they were arguing over is even worse:

Waters and Obey have had an ongoing dispute about an earmark for a public school employment training center in Los Angeles that was named after Waters when she was a state representative.
Obey rejected that earmark as violating policies against so-called “monuments to me.” Waters revised her request to go to the school district’s whole adult employment training program, so the district could decide whether the money would go to the school named after Waters.

This whole sense of righteous that plagues our elected leaders, making them feel that they deserve things named after them has to stop. Pushing for something named after yourself isn’t symbolic of your service to our nation, its symbolic of your overgrown ego.

And I know Obey can be a hot head also. The article says Hoyer met with him, but it wasn’t over the altercation. It sure as hell should have been. The House leadership should look into it and punish whoever was at fault. Stop this childish behavior.

Barney Frank Introduces Marijuana Legislation

Posted 6/23/09 at 11:07am by jamie

He did this last year unsuccessfully, hopefully it will be different this time:

Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts has introduced two pieces of legislation on marijuana -- one medical, and one recreational -- that deserve a lot more attention (and support by fellow House members) than they have been getting. The first would change federal law to allow states to experiment with medical marijuana without interference from Washington. And the second would drastically reduce federal penalties for "personal possession" of marijuana.

The medical marijuana bill aims to fix a problem in the federal classification of marijuana. The problem was best summed up in a live performance by Bill Maher I saw a number of months ago, where he talked about medical marijuana laws that states such as California (and others) have passed. I don't remember his exact words, but it went something like this: "It's still illegal to grow it, it's illegal for doctors to prescribe it, it's illegal to sell it, it's illegal to buy it, but if a joint happens to fall from the sky into your lips, then it's OK to smoke it."

Our country has the highest incarceration levels on the planet and a lot of that is contributed to our ridiculous drug laws. Considering the cost of incarcerating a person, fixing these flawed laws not only makes sense, but is also fiscally responsible. Of course many in Congress don’t think like that.

How Bad Are Those Prisoner Abuse Photos?

Posted 5/28/09 at 7:43am by jamie

When President Obama changed his mind and said he wouldn’t release those photos I figured it had to be something really bad.

At least one picture shows an American soldier apparently raping a female prisoner while another is said to show a male translator raping a male detainee.

Further photographs are said to depict sexual assaults on prisoners with objects including a truncheon, wire and a phosphorescent tube.

Another apparently shows a female prisoner having her clothing forcibly removed to expose her breasts.

Detail of the content emerged from Major General Antonio Taguba, the former army officer who conducted an inquiry into the Abu Ghraib jail in Iraq.

Reading this I kept thinking back to 2003 when Bush and his ilk were out there saying “Saddam has these rape and torture rooms”. Well guess what? So do we..

As we continue to learn more about Gitmo and Abu Gharib its becoming harder to believe that Abu Gharib was just a few soldiers acting on their own ambitions. We already know that what we saw happening in the original Abu Gharib manuals pretty much mimic what the EIT memos were saying. That means someone either gave orders/guidance or we have just seen the king of all coincidences.

No matter what cause Abu Gharib to occur, one thing is for certain. We now need a full blown inquiry. It mustn’t be limited to one facility, but to the military and intelligence community as a whole. This is the kind of investigation that only Congress along with a army of prosecutors can delve into. Hopefully this latest report will put us closer to that reality, and that reality is that this happened at the hands of the U.S.:

(photos after the fold – graphic warning)

Court Action Filed Against FDA Over Electronic Cigarettes

Posted 5/4/09 at 7:36am by jamie

Smoking Everywhere, one of the nation’s largest distributors of electronic cigarettes, has filed for an injunction against the FDA for stopping their shipments from coming in over seas. The suit claims (and rightfully so) that the FDA is overstepping their bounds.

The FDA is attempting to classify Electronic Cigarettes as a smoking cessation/nicotine replacement device. Nothing could be further from the truth. Electronic cigarettes are being marketed as a smoking alternative, not for cessation.

The really interesting part is that the FDA is not just halting the liquid nicotine used in these devices, but the actual hardware itself. Since when does the FDA have jurisdiction over electronics? They don’t. Its similar to drug paraphernalia. You can go to a store and buy a crack pipe or bong, but when you try to use them for their intended purpose you go to jail.

So the delivery device for something that is much safer and that the active ingredient (nicotine) can be obtained by countless forms over the counter is being halted by the FDA? Hopefully Congress will take action and stop this over stepping of power being exercised by the FDA. That or maybe a judge with common sense will read the complaint filed by Smoking Everywhere and issue the injunction. Sure it will likely head through the court system all the way to the top, but I believe the SCOTUS will judge on the side of the electronic cigarette. That’s the benefit of having a right leaning court.

Killing The Small Farmers

Posted 4/8/09 at 7:22pm by jamie

This is why I always say we need two parties in government – it helps level things out. Now that the Democrats are in charge, they are going overboard on regulation:

The panics over salmonella, E. Coli and unsafe foodstuffs from China have heightened the prospects that Congress will enact a measure known as H.R. 875, the “Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009?.  Should the measure in its current form become law, “food establishments”, which to quote Patrick at Popehat “means anyone selling or storing food of any type for transmission to third parties via the act of commerce”*, will have to register with a new federal regulatory agency, submit to federal inspections, and, perhaps most significant, keep “copious records of sales and shipment by lot and label”. Penalties for infractions will be very, very steep.

I live in farm land. One of the things I love about it is being able to go down to the local farmers markets on the weekend and get fresh produce. This bill could put an end to all that.

What has happened during the Bush years in regards to regulation was sickening, but the Democrats answer is to do the complete opposite – over regulate. It’s not the small farmers causing the problems – it’s the large scale, corporate farms. Why not take us back to the same kind of regulation we had prior to Bush? We didn’t suffer the recalls then like we do now. This “panic legislation” is not the answer at all and it needs to be stopped.

Emanuel’s Seat To Remain Blue

Posted 4/8/09 at 9:29am by jamie

It’s funny that even with the entire Blago debacle going on in Illinois and Republicans trying to paint Democrats in the state as the epitome of corruption, the people still want Democrats to lead them:

Democratic Cook County Commissioner Mike Quigley claimed victory tonight in the 5th District race to replace Rahm Emanuel in Congress.

With 94 percent of the Chicago and suburban Cook precincts reporting totals, Quigley was ahead with 70 percent of the vote over Republican Rosanna Pulido and Green Party candidate Matt Reichel.

That’s a huge margin in a time when corruption as front and center in the local news. It also says a lot about the Republicans and their hopes in 2010.

Michele Bachmann – Still Crazy

Posted 3/24/09 at 9:25am by jamie

The car wreck called Bachmann is back, and this time she is crazier than ever. I guess since Congress and the media didn’t take up her McCarthyite investigations into Democrats, she now has to try and provoke an actual revolution.

I’m actually kind of glad Bachmann won last year. Its nice having her around to show exactly how crazy the GOP is.

Deep Thought

Posted 3/17/09 at 10:37pm by jamie

Congress can give the telecom companies immunity from criminal and civil prosecution for illegally tapping the phones of millions of citizens.

So why can’t Congress offer a sort of immunity to AIG for not paying up on these so called “contracts”?

I guess our constitution just isn’t as important as the people who helped run AIG into the ground. Now that is a sad state of the union.

Public Anger Is Growing

Posted 3/16/09 at 9:09am by jamie

The Obama administration is in trouble. Public anger over these AIG bonuses appear to be the final straw:

The Obama administration is increasingly concerned about a populist backlash against banks and Wall Street, worried that anger at financial institutions could also end up being directed at Congress and the White House and could complicate President Obama’s agenda.

As Greg Sargent points out this morning, the meme the administration is pushing that this outrage is flowing through from the Bush administration and problems that happened then isn’t cutting it either.

Also the whole notion that the administration’s “hands are tied” is a bunch of bullshit. It was easy to tell the automakers that they had to restructure their companies, including compensation, but those same concessions don’t/can’t carry over to Wall Street firms?

If the Obama administration wants to push their agenda through, they need to listen to the American people’s agenda and stop this madness. Congressional leaders are already upset and they will be hearing it more from their constituents, so that means less support for Obama in Congress.

Interesting Wording

Posted 3/10/09 at 11:14pm by jamie

Check out this headline from the AP:

Democrats block GOP bid to extend DC vouchers

Hmmm – really sounds like some parliamentary move to stop the vote, like a filibuster or something. But read on:

The Senate voted 50-39 along mostly party lines to reject a bid by Nevada Republican Sen. John Ensign to extend the program beyond the 2009-2010 school year. That leaves in place a provision contained in a huge spending bill that requires Congress and the Washington, D.C. government to re-approve the program. Republicans say that is likely to kill it.

Ahhh so the measure failed by a standard vote, in which they didn’t get a majority.

Now if this was a Democratic bill that didn’t make it through, the headline would read more like “Democrats fail to get enough votes to pass …..”, even if they only have 59 votes.

So when it’s a filibuster, then it’s “not enough votes”, but when a measure just fails then it is “blocked”. Yeah that makes sense.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter