democratic caucus

Why Pelosi Is The Right Woman For The Job

Posted 11/15/10 at 8:31am by jamie

If you have any doubts rather Pelosi should be minority leader or not, just take a look at this post from Armstrong Williams:

A barely known Democratic member of the House has done what over a half-dozen more qualified of his colleagues have cowered in fear over — mount a challenge to Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and her bid to remain the highest-ranking member when Democrats assume the minority in January.

Rep. Heath Shuler (N.C.), a former Heisman award winner, stepped up yesterday and announced his bid to unseat Pelosi as incoming minority leader. This isn’t some empty challenge, even though Shuler stands little chance. It’s one based on recognition of the political reality facing this party now — they’re about to be led over a cliff again by the same liberal shepherd.

Williams is taking Heath Shuler’s challenge to become minority leader as a real threat against Pelosi. Shuler is one of the few remaining Blue Dogs in the Democratic caucus, which saw a 50% loss of membership on Election Day. The fact that Williams is overlooking is that the more liberal members of Congress did fine in their election bids.

So thanks Armstrong for giving Pelosi the ultimate endorsement. If the House Democrats listen to you and do the exact opposite then they will see their numbers grow in future cycles.

Americans Think Congress Is Useless. The Democrats Are Determined To Prove Them Right

Posted 9/24/10 at 11:09am by jamie

WizardLionClose Yesterday I posted about our weak kneed leaders in Congress. Today they seem set on proving my point:

With a potentially bruising election less than six weeks away, Democrats on Capitol Hill came to an impasse Thursday over what to do about the Bush tax cuts. The result was a decision to do nothing, at least until after the elections, when Congress comes back to Washington for a lame duck session.

For weeks, Republicans have happily watched from the sidelines as liberal and moderate Democrats have struggled to agree on the best course of action, both politically and on policy grounds, with the Bush-era tax policy that Democrats describe as a "time bomb." All of the tax cuts -- including those on income, estates and dividends, as well as the child tax credit, the marriage penalty and the Alternative Minimum Tax -- will return to 2001 levels (as the legislation originally called for) unless Congress acts this year.

Greg Sergeant points out that the Democratic leadership is afraid that if the tax cuts expire on the top 2%, the Republicans will accuse them of “raising taxes”.

Now This Is A Hell Of An Idea

Posted 3/11/10 at 8:25am by jamie

This whole “seniority” thing in the Senate has always been a bunch of garbage and helped contribute to the “good ole’ boys” club mentality that surrounds the chamber. Now it looks like it could be coming to an end:

During a question-and-answer session with progressive media, video blogger Mike Stark asked lawmakers why the Democratic caucus hasn't yanked Sen. Blanche Lincoln's chairmanship of the Agriculture Committee, considering her opposition to Democratic legislative efforts. In Arkansas, her gavel is a top selling point as she battles a progressive primary challenge.

"We're going to elect committee chairs next year," said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). "The current chairs that are sitting there now understand that we'll be electing chairs next year," he added, saying the idea had been cleared with Senate leadership.

Under current rules, members of the caucus can weigh in by objecting to an overall Senate organizing resolution, but don't have an up-or-down vote on each chair.

That’s exactly how it should be. Take Lieberman as an example. The only reason he is still a Democrat is so that he can keep his seniority and have his Homeland Security chairmanship. It doesn’t matter if Jack Bauer himself became a senator, Lieberman would still be chair because of his seniority.

It’s practices like this that have made the Senate a laughing stock of the free world. I’m glad to see talk of ending it. If these people really think they should chair committees, then let them fight for it. It’s time for our senators to prove their worth.

Public Option Support Growing In The Senate

Posted 2/18/10 at 9:08am by jamie

Following up on yesterday’s post, the number of senators singing the letter to urge Harry Reid to put the public option back in play is now growing. Here’s where the list stands:

  • Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.)
  • Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio)
  • Michael Bennet (D-Col.)
  • Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
  • Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
  • Al Franken (D-Minn.)
  • Pat Leahy (D-VT)
  • Roland Burris (D-Ill.)
  • John Kerry (D-Mass.)
  • Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI).

These senators have not yet signed on but signaled strong support for the public option:

  • Tom Harkin (D-Iowa)
  • Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.)
  • Ben Cardin (D-Md.)
  • Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)

This is an awesome momentum, with 14 senators now showing strong support for the public option. That’s almost 1/4 of the Democratic caucus, and the number seems to out shadow the number of blue dogs now. You better start listening Harry.

Harry Reid In Big Trouble

Posted 12/4/09 at 2:15pm by jamie

You know, if Harry ends up getting voted out of office I won’t mind one bit. He has been a very ineffective leader and the Democratic caucus seems content on keeping him in the position:

A new poll indicates that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, continues to trail two potential Republican rivals, less than one year before the 2010 elections.

Former Nevada Republican Party Chair Sue Lowden holds a 10-point lead over Reid, while businessman Danny Tarkanian has a six-point advantage over the Democratic senator, according to the Mason-Dixon Polling & Research survey conducted on behalf of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Maybe the voters of Nevada will finally end our nightmare.

The Politics Of ‘Gotcha’

Posted 11/19/08 at 10:08am by jamie

unity_medallion_wedding Vendettas and ‘gotcha’ is the politics of old. It’s synonymous with the old attack ads, and something the American people have started rejected, rather strongly. Barack Obama campaigned on change. In two weeks since becoming our President elect, Obama has:

Embraced his one time rival Hillary Clinton, offering her a top position in his administration

Welcomed his recent rival, John McCain, to sit down and discuss how to move forward and put country first.

Dismissed any calls of Joe Lieberman being punished for campaigning against him.

The last issue is the biggie, causing so much outrage throughout the blogosphere right now. Obama said he was going to give us change, and he has. I wish some in the blogosphere would learn to accept that, instead of acting like the person who just murdered a family member was acquitted.

And if they have trouble listening to me, then listen to what Bob Cesca has to say on it – hitting on another point:

With Begich's victory, the Democratic caucus has grown to 58. With Franken and Martin, we could hit 60. Filibuster proof -- at least on paper. But imagine if the Democrats had voted to ejector-seat Lieberman from his chairmanship, and he had stormed off to the Republicans, as he had threatened.

The Begich win would've been nullified in terms of the caucus head-count. One step back to 57. Even if Martin and Franken both win, we would've been stuck at 59.

Democratic Caucus Update

Posted 1/3/08 at 8:28pm by jamie

At 9:00 PM:

Senator Barack Obama : 33.29%
Senator John Edwards : 32.11%
Senator Hillary Clinton : 31.71%
Governor Bill Richardson : 1.74%
Senator Joe Biden : 1.03%
Senator Chris Dodd : 0.07%
Uncommitted : 0.05%
Precincts Reporting: 659 of 1781

Via the Iowa Democratic Party Caucus

Can't get much closer than that!

REPUBLICANS

All news networks have called it for Huckaboner. This guy will be fun to beat hehe.

The Rogue Cheney

Posted 6/24/07 at 12:06pm by jamie

I had a feeling the news of Cheney's saying he is not part of the executive branch would start a fire storm. I just had no idea it would be this big.

Rahm Emanuel is showing a pair and ready to really go after Cheney in a way that sounds perfectly legal:

Following Vice President Dick Cheney's assertion that his office is not a part of the executive branch of the US government, Democratic Caucus Chairman Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) plans to introduce an amendment to the the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill to cut funding for Cheney's office.

The amendment to the bill that sets the funding for the executive branch will be considered next week in the House of Representatives.

Emanuel also suggested that Cheney needs to return his salary to the U.S. taxpayers and move out of the house paid for by us. Since that house is paid for by us and for the Vice President of the United States, who is part of the executive branch, I say Cheney be evicted immediately. Hell - I say he gets charged with trespassing!

The Washington Post has also started a four part series today about Cheney, entitled "Angler". Think Progress has already torn into part one and discovered this:

Shortly after Bush was elected, “Cheney preferred, and Bush approved, a mandate that gave him access to ‘every table and every meeting,’ making his voice heard in ‘whatever area the vice president feels he wants to be active in.’”

Conyers Scores A Win

Posted 9/14/05 at 11:29pm by jamie

From

Raw Story

Landmark hate crimes legislation passes
House

09/14/2005 @ 5:36 pm

 In an unexpected 223-199 vote, the House of Representatives passed
sweeping hate crimes legislation Wednesday, including protections for
minorities and gays who are the subject of hate crimes.

The bill, authored by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), was a rider on another
bill -- the Child Safety Act. Thirty moderate Republicans joined the
Democratic caucus in supporting the amendment; the bill now goes to the
Senate, where its fate is uncertain.

Conyers was elated about the measure's passage.

"The passage of this legislation is an historic event that has its basis
in the anti-lynching efforts of the 1930's," the Michigan Democrat told RAW
STORY. "This has truly been a bipartisan effort that was year in the
making."

Conyers said it was the first criminal law-based civil rights legislation
to pass in decades.

In 2003, the most recent data available, law enforcement agencies
identified 9,100 victims arising from 8,715 separate criminal bias-based
offenses. Reporting by law enforcement is voluntary and it is widely
believed that hate crimes are seriously under-reported.

Current law limits federal jurisdiction over hate crimes to incidents
against protected classes that occur only during the exercise of federally
protected activities, such as voting. Such statutes do not permit federal
involvement in a range of cases where crimes are motivated by bias against
the victim's perceived sexual orientation, gender, disability or gender
identity.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter