freedom of information act request

The U.S./Mexico Border Not So Dangerous

Posted 6/3/10 at 9:50am by jamie

Since Arizona passed their immigration law, we have heard constant sound bites about how dangerous the U.S./Mexico border is. Well it turns out that the border isn't as dangerous as the proponents of the new law are making it out to be:

It's one of the safest parts of America, and it's getting safer.

It's the U.S.-Mexico border, and even as politicians say more federal troops are needed to fight rising violence, government data obtained by The Associated Press show it actually isn't so dangerous after all.

The top four big cities in America with the lowest rates of violent crime are all in border states: San Diego, Phoenix, El Paso and Austin, according to a new FBI report. And an in-house Customs and Border Protection report shows that Border Patrol agents face far less danger than street cops in most U.S. cities.

The Customs and Border Protection study, obtained with a Freedom of Information Act request, shows 3 percent of Border Patrol agents and officers were assaulted last year, mostly when assailants threw rocks at them. That compares with 11 percent of police officers and sheriff's deputies assaulted during the same period, usually with guns or knives.

It's funny how the right, that party of "small government", wants the government to spend resources securing the border and are trying to sell it on "increased violence". If the right is so worried about law enforcement, then shouldn't they also be pushing for extra federal protections against our police officers? How about limiting access to guns?

BREAKING: Declassified Documents Showed A Need For More Troops In 1999 And A Democratic Iraq "Not Feasible" (Updated and bumped)

Posted 11/4/06 at 5:50pm by jamie

(I am bumping this story back to the top as it is rather significant and now the mainstream media is starting to report on it. Just remember - you heard it here first lol) 

A new document has been unclassified through a FOIA request by the National Security Archive.

A series of war games held in 1999 specifically to anticipate problems following an invasion of Iraq assumed a deployment of 400,000 troops to maintain order, seal borders and provide for other security needs. But the games, known as Desert Crossing, were apparently ignored by the Defense Department. When CENTCOM commander Gen. Anthony Zinni, after his retirement, advised planners to refer back to Desert Crossing as they prepared for the 2003 invasion, the response reportedly was, "Never heard of it."

Now, seven years later, documentation on preparations for the games and detailed After Action records have surfaced in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the National Security Archive, which is posting the materials on its Web site today.

This is very damaging to the administration and Pentagon. It also supports the claims by General Shinseki regarding the higher level of troops needed. Even more damming is the assessment of dealing with Iraq after the topple of Saddam:

Guantanamo names to be released

Posted 3/3/06 at 8:47pm by Anonymous (not verified)

 This has just been shown on the BBC News website.

the names will be relesed...but guess what, you got to find them within a 6000 page document!

The US defence department has said it will release the names of inmates detained at its Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba later on Friday.
However, the names will not appear as a simple list - they will be buried within 6,000 pages of documents to be posted on the Pentagon website.

They are transcripts of tribunals in which the 500 detainees were screened and their combat status assessed.

The transcripts have been released before, but with the names blacked out.

The files are being released as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the Associated Press.

It will be the first time most of the names will have been made public.

'Ghost' detainees

Detainees were screened at the Combatant Status Review Tribunals with a view to categorising them as "enemy combatants".

The BBC's Pentagon correspondent, Adam Brookes, says it will take days, or even weeks, for the documents to be read and analysed, but once the names are public, much more will be learned about who they are and the circumstances of their capture and detention.

However, our correspondent says that only inmates who underwent Combatant Status Review Tribunals will be named.

It is quite possible that there are other prisoners, known as "ghost" detainees, in Guantanamo, he adds.

Force feeding

In a separate development, a Kuwaiti man being held at Guantanamo Bay has given a rare interview to the BBC in which he has described the force-feeding of hunger strikers at the camp, something which he says amounts to torture.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter