governments

What We Lost 10 Years Ago Today

Posted 9/11/11 at 10:36am by jamie

The news is full of coverage of the anniversary of 9/11. You can change the channel without being reminded of what happened 10 years ago today. It was one of the most tragic days in American history and one none of us will ever forget.

And while we spend the day remembering this anniversary, let’s not lose sight of what else we lost on this day 10 years ago – America.

Since 9/11 this country has become increasingly more divided. We got a severely broken government that can’t operate due to partisan bickering. We saw the birth of this not long after the attacks 10 years ago. The Bush administration became hell bent on attacking a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, Iraq. People who disagreed with that war were called terrorists or even accused of treason. This wasn’t limited to bars or living rooms. We even heard the vice-President of the country, Dick Cheney, as well as other officials from the administration and politicians use the same harsh language against those opposed to Iraq.

That’s right – 9/11 changed America and not for the better. We became a nation where disagreeing with the President was tantamount to wanting to overthrow the government. We had a government turn to the same thinking as the Middle Eastern governments we were going after. Freedom started a quick death on that day and America is worst off because of it.

Heading Towards Disaster Part Deux

Posted 9/14/09 at 8:43am by jamie

There has been a lot of warnings lately that we are heading right towards another Lehman style collapse:

Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize- winning economist, said the U.S. has failed to fix the underlying problems of its banking system after the credit crunch and the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

“In the U.S. and many other countries, the too-big-to-fail banks have become even bigger,” Stiglitz said in an interview today in Paris. “The problems are worse than they were in 2007 before the crisis.”

Stiglitz’s views echo those of former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, who has advised President Barack Obama’s administration to curtail the size of banks, and Bank of Israel Governor Stanley Fischer, who suggested last month that governments may want to discourage financial institutions from growing “excessively.”

‘Serious Violation Of International Law’

Posted 11/18/08 at 8:31am by jamie

_1682986_lord_bingham150 Lord Bingham, one of the Brittan's top judiciary figures has condemned the Iraq war, calling it a “serious violation of international law”:

Lord Bingham, in his first major speech since retiring as the senior law lord, rejected the then attorney general's defence of the 2003 invasion as fundamentally flawed.

Contradicting head-on Lord Goldsmith's advice that the invasion was lawful, Bingham stated: "It was not plain that Iraq had failed to comply in a manner justifying resort to force and there were no strong factual grounds or hard evidence to show that it had." Adding his weight to the body of international legal opinion opposed to the invasion, Bingham said that to argue, as the British government had done, that Britain and the US could unilaterally decide that Iraq had broken UN resolutions "passes belief".

Governments were bound by international law as much as by their domestic laws, he said. "The current ministerial code," he added "binding on British ministers, requires them as an overarching duty to 'comply with the law, including international law and treaty obligations'."

Sadly though these people always wait until they are out of a position of power to speak up. It would have been nice if they spoke up 5 1/2 years ago. The world might be a much better place today.

No More Roves!

Posted 7/8/08 at 9:29am by jamie

This is legislation we really need passed, and Waxman is considering it:

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), who has primary jurisdiction over the executive branch, is considering legislation to eliminate Karl Rove-type advisers in future administrations.

The chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hints broadly that such a bill could ban the use of federal funds to finance such a politically partisan office.

“Why should we be using taxpayer dollars to have a person solely in charge of politics in the White House?” Waxman said in an interview. “Can you imagine the reaction if each member of Congress had a campaign person paid for with taxpayer dollars?”

But other governments have done this in the past? I know of one government that had paid political officers in every part of government, and the military. That government was the Soviet Union. Isn't that the goal of the GOP - to make us more like the commies? Look at the legislation and way they govern. It sure seems like it.

This Is How Bush Protects America

Posted 3/17/08 at 5:21pm by jamie

By having his agencies screw up the terrorist watch list:

A new Justice Department audit shows that for nearly three years the FBI gave outdated, incomplete and error-riddled data about terror suspects to be added to the government's watchlist.

Overall, the audit by the department's inspector general gives the FBI a mixed review for its process of nominating names and submitting other information to be included in the terrorist watchlist that is maintained by U.S. intelligence agencies

Think of the people who missed vacations because of the no-fly list. They did nothing wrong, but were punished because of this governments inability to do their jobs. Yeah I know how the right wing loves to lie about there not being a terrorist attack since 9/11 (ignoring things like anthrax), but that was purely by luck. This administration has done nothing to stop terrorism - it's just a political tool for them.

Petraeus Not Happy With Iraq

Posted 3/14/08 at 9:41am by jamie

He says they aren't making "significant progress":

Iraqi leaders have failed to take advantage of a reduction in violence to make adequate progress toward resolving their political differences, Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said Thursday.

Petraeus, who is preparing to testify to Congress next month on the Iraq war, said in an interview that "no one" in the U.S. and Iraqi governments "feels that there has been sufficient progress by any means in the area of national reconciliation," or in the provision of basic public services.

The general's comments appeared to be his sternest to date on Iraqis' failure to achieve political reconciliation. In February, following the passage of laws on the budget, provincial elections and an amnesty for certain detainees, Petraeus was more encouraging. "The passage of the three laws today showed that the Iraqi leaders are now taking advantage of the opportunity that coalition and Iraqi troopers fought so hard to provide," he said at the time.

And now we know why Bush wants to keep the next Iraq progress report secret.

From The Files Of "Spreading Democracy"

Posted 3/20/06 at 7:01pm by jamie

I am glad we are helping people become free in this world. Bush really is doing great:

A man could be sentenced to death after being charged with converting from Islam to Christianity, a crime under Afghanistan's shariah laws, a judge said yesterday. The trial is thought to be the first of its kind in Afghanistan and highlights a struggle between religious conservatives and reformists over what shape Islam will take four years after the fall of the Taliban.

Abdul Rahman, 41, was arrested last month after his family accused him of becoming a Christian, Judge Ansarullah Mawlavezada told Associated Press. The accused was charged with rejecting Islam.

During the one-day hearing on Thursday, the defendant allegedly confessed to converting to Christianity 16 years ago while working as a medical aid worker for an international Christian group helping Afghan refugees in the Pakistani city of Peshawar, Judge Mawlavezada said.

That's right folks. This democracy we have spread has made it so governments are free to kill people for changing religions. I wonder what God has to say to Bush about this one?

 UPDATE:

Armando at Daily Kos has much more on this important news story.

UK's Biggest Strike Action

Posted 3/16/06 at 10:38am by Anonymous (not verified)

The UK will be hit by strike action by some 1.5 million people on March 26th. The action will take place by Council / Local Authority Staff. This is the biggest strike in the UK since 1926. The strike could have another twist is teachers also decide to join in with the planned action.

It is over Pension Plans and that there is a major shortfall in the governments funds to pay people their pensions. The government has been trying to get people to work until they are much older which in turn would postpone the pension payments.

Bush = Osama

Posted 1/26/06 at 12:29am by jamie

This just proves how deep the hatred of the far right goes:

In a reversal of policy, the United States on Monday backed an Iranian
initiative to deny United Nations consultative status to organizations
working to protect the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)
people. In a letter to Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, a coalition of 39
organizations, led by the Human Rights Campaign, Human Rights Watch, the
International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, and the National Gay
and Lesbian Task Force, called for an explanation of the vote which aligned
the United States with governments that have long repressed the rights of
sexual minorities.

Article continues
here.

Don't worry about nuclear weapons George, the gay community could get some
rights and that is a bigger threat. This goes to prove the point that the ideals
of terrorists is the same as the ideals of George W. Bush.

Bush Takes Responsibility

Posted 9/13/05 at 5:52pm by jamie

Bush has accepted full responsibility for the governments failed response in
the days immediately following Katrina's land fall. "To the extent the federal
government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility," Bush said in a
joint press conference with Iraq's President this after noon.

Bush did reaffirm his desire to find out "what went right and what went
wrong".

This is actually kind of a shocking position for the President to take. His
typical arrogance seems to be going by the way side as he faces the lowest
approval rating in his career, hovering just above Nixon's approval at the time
he resigned.

This should make for a more interesting speech tonight as he takes this
responsibility in front of the nation. Myself, I am not to optimistic that it is
a much needed turn around into the way Bush is running the country. I think this
is more of a public relations "necessity" being initiated by his declining
approval rating and growing questions over the disaster.

 

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter