hurricane katrina

As Isaac Nears, GOP Goes Into Full "Blame Obama" Mode

Posted 8/28/12 at 11:55am by jamie

Hurricane Isaac is set to hit the Gulf late tonight, early Wednesday morning. With that we have the GOP at a category five stage of hot air, trying to blame President Obama for everything.

First off we have the Republican leader and king of all conspiracy theories, Rush Limbaugh, suggesting that Obama had the Weather Service manipulate models to force the RNC to cancel the first night of their convention:

It’s the government. It’s Obama.
And I’m noticing that that track stayed zeroed in on Tampa day after day after day. And the Republicans react to it accordingly over the weekend, canceling the first day of the convention. What could be better for the Democrats than the Republicans to cancel a day of this? [...]
Okay, 6:45 p.m. Saturday night the Republicans announce that they’re canceling Monday. At 6:45 p.m. Saturday night, everybody is still under the impression that Isaac is making a beeline for very close to Tampa. It was an hour and 15 minutes later that the eight p.m. model runs showed New Orleans. I’m alleging no conspiracy. I’m just telling you, folks, when you put this all together in this timeline, I’m telling you, it’s unbelievable.

You can hear it for yourself, thanks to Think Progress:

And then we have the right going after the President for campaigning while Isaac comes. Here is what Drudge is pushing:

What Happens If Isaac Gets Worse?

Posted 8/25/12 at 1:29pm by jamie

Click for latest cone

Hurricane Isaac is on target to Florida starting tomorrow night. Currently the storm is off the coast of Cuba, but being over open, warm water means that Isaac has the fuel it needs to gain strength.

As we know the Republican convention starts in Tampa this week. There has already been talk in the media of delaying it, but Reince Priebus, the RNC chair, has vowed that won't happen.

Now this makes me wonder a few things. Let's take a walk down a hypothetical, but probably road.

Say Isaac ends up gaining more steam than the computer models are predicting and even moves a little more to the east, giving Tampa a more direct hit. Certainly Tampa officials would issue evacuation orders. So if that happens and the RNC decides to ignore them, another strong possibility by what Priebus is saying, should the government not help those in attendance should they need it?

That's a very serious question and I only bring it up because of the right's reaction to Hurricane Katrina. Remember back then? The right didn't blame the totally botched response of the government, but rather the people for not listening to the warnings. Well they are prepared to do the same here.

Wingers Go After Obama For Not Being In Missouri

Posted 5/24/11 at 5:12pm by jamie

Weasel Zippers has this headline up:

Obama: My “Deepest Condolences” to Joplin Tornado Victims, Now Watch Me Drink This Beer!…

And it is followed by this picture:

Even the commenters are chiming in:

But Bush would never do that - would he?

That would be then President Bush strumming along the day after hurricane Katrina wiped out New Orleans and while the whole Gulf region was still in disarray, thousands were trapped and people were still dying. But just ask the wingnuts - this never happened!

What Does Race Have To Do With This?

Posted 5/3/10 at 7:23am by jamie

If anyone wonders why CNN is in such a downward spiral, they only need to look at this article to get an idea of why:

Oil slick awaits New Orleans' 1st white mayor in decades

The first white mayor of New Orleans in more than 30 years steps into his first challenge as soon as he takes office Monday: the massive oil slick that is creeping to his coast.

The fallout from a ruptured undersea well off Louisiana is spewing about 210,000 gallons (5,000 barrels) of crude a day into the Gulf of Mexico. And efforts to corral the rapidly growing oil spill have so far been unsuccessful.

The article is predominately focused on the oil spill, with only the first paragraph and this little bit about New Orleans news mayor:

Into this climate, steps Democrat Mitch Landrieu.

His city is still digging itself out from the wrath of Hurricane Katrina five years ago. And his state is the top producer of seafood -- and so, has a lot at stake from the spill's impact.

Landrieu -- who lost two previous mayoral bids in 1994 and 2006 -- replaces the term-limited Ray Nagin in a city where about two-thirds of the residents are black.

The city's last white mayor was Landrieu's father, Maurice "Moon" Landrieu, who left office in 1978. He is remembered fondly for desegregating the city, appointing African-Americans to positions of city leadership and opening up public facilities to blacks.

Last week, the younger Landrieu took part in a flyover of the spill for a first-hand look.

"As this situation becomes clearer, there are obvious environmental and health concerns, especially as it relates to Lake Pontchartrain, our coast, and our air quality," he said Thursday. "But, there is also an economic component of the utmost importance including the impact on our fisheries

4 Years After Katrina

Posted 8/9/09 at 10:23am by jamie

Its hard to believe its been almost four years since Katrina hit. Its even harder to believe that its taken almost four years to see some real action regarding the police actions on the night the storm hit:

Nearly four years after the police shootout that took the lives of Ronald Madison and James Brissette on New Orleans’ Danziger Bridge, the FBI raided the offices of the police investigators who had been looking into the deadly incident.

The bureau’s move suggests that the federal government may be serious about seeing police officers prosecuted over the Sept. 4, 2005 shootout, when Madison and Brissette were allegedly killed by police and four others wounded as they crossed a bridge in the midst of the Hurricane Katrina crisis.

It also suggests the FBI may be worried that New Orleans police are trying — or may in the future try — to destroy evidence of what happened that day.

Many Americans watched this unfold that night on their televisions and were in horror. Not just the fact that this was happening in a 21st American city, but the fact that the federal government was AWOL. Its a solid reminder of just how dangerously derelict a Republican administration was.

Mad Crush

Posted 5/16/09 at 8:02am by jamie

Someone doesn’t like people talking about her man:

I was disappointed to read “Gov. Paterson’s Performance” (editorial, May 9), which characterized Joe Scarborough as a “leader in the Republican attack squad.”

My television and radio co-host has spent the last five years being equally tough on Republican and Democratic leaders in Washington. Joe was one of the first TV reporters to criticize the Bush White House during Hurricane Katrina. And while others were writing of a permanent Republican majority, Joe was predicting the collapse of the G.O.P. because of its reckless economic policies.

On our TV and radio programs, and also in his latest book, Joe urges his party to be more moderate in temperament and more accepting of dissent from leaders like former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell.

Joe’s evenhanded approach angers harsh ideologues on both sides. Last week, he was attacked by right-wing hosts for being too open-minded, and now byyour liberal editorial page.

This liberal thinks The New York Times should follow Joe Scarborough’s example of speaking truth to power — regardless of which party is in power.

Mika Brzezinski
New York, May 11, 2009

I used to watch Morning Joe every morning and Mika is nothing but a sidekick. If she says something he doesn’t agree with then Joe quickly “puts her in her place”. It’s like some sick reality show of a husband controlling his wife’s every view. No wonder they have a ratings problem.

Presidential Cyber Slam

Posted 1/20/09 at 5:27pm by jamie

I have been spending some time today checking out the new White House website. Buried under the agenda section, in a subsection entitled “Katrina”, I noticed this little tidbit:

President Obama will keep the broken promises made by President Bush to rebuild New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. He and Vice President Biden will take steps to ensure that the federal government will never again allow such catastrophic failures in emergency planning and response to occur.

President Obama swiftly responded to Hurricane Katrina. Citing the Bush Administration's {[}]amp;quot;unconscionable ineptitude" in responding to Hurricane Katrina, then-Senator Obama introduced legislation requiring disaster planners to take into account the specific needs of low-income hurricane victims. Obama visited thousands of Hurricane survivors in the Houston Convention Center and later took three more trips to the region. He worked with members of the Congressional Black Caucus to introduce legislation to address the immediate income, employment, business, and housing needs of Gulf Coast communities.

President Barack Obama will partner with the people of the Gulf Coast to rebuild now, stronger than ever.

The nice guy is now taking a back seat to the truth.

Fixing FEMA

Posted 11/25/08 at 9:26am by jamie

 FEMA_seal There is so much damage control to be done from eight years of total incompetence running our country that we end up forgetting where all the broken pieces are. Well Barack Obama hasn’t forgotten and he is working to fix them. One big piece is FEMA:

The Federal Emergency Management Administration, a tragicomic disaster since Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 -- and even before then -- looks to be getting a facelift under the Obama administration, sources tell us.

First off, the likely plan is to break off the agency from the Department of Homeland Security, a move that would in itself help restore the pride FEMA folks felt when it was an independent agency.

Second, there's increasing talk that former director James Lee Witt, who took over the then-troubled agency at the start of the Clinton administration and left it eight years later with a much enhanced reputation for getting things done, is coming back in from retirement to run FEMA for maybe six months to a year and whip it into shape.

After Katrina we heard how there would be major restructuring of FEMA. Congress even said it should be totally rebuilt. Bush ignored it. President Ego once again thought he knew best. Of course FEMA hasn’t been really tested since Katrina, so a well thought out restructuring is the only way to help insure they are ready to respond. Breaking them off from Homeland Security is an excellent start and brining back James Lee Witt will help make it all possible.

Thanks, But No Thanks!

Posted 4/29/07 at 10:05am by jamie

While New Orleans still sits in ruins, we now find out that George W. Bush rejected almost all international aide:

As the winds and water of Hurricane Katrina were receding, presidential confidante Karen Hughes sent a cable from her State Department office to U.S. ambassadors worldwide.

Titled "Echo-Chamber Message" -- a public relations term for talking points designed to be repeated again and again -- the Sept. 7, 2005, directive was unmistakable: Assure the scores of countries that had pledged or donated aid at the height of the disaster that their largesse had provided Americans "practical help and moral support" and "highlight the concrete benefits hurricane victims are receiving."

Many of the U.S. diplomats who received the message, however, were beginning to witness a more embarrassing reality. They knew the U.S. government was turning down many allies' offers of manpower, supplies and expertise worth untold millions of dollars. Eventually the United States also would fail to collect most of the unprecedented outpouring of international cash assistance for Katrina's victims.

Allies offered $854 million in cash and in oil that was to be sold for cash. But only $40 million has been used so far for disaster victims or reconstruction, according to U.S. officials and contractors. Most of the aid went uncollected, including $400 million worth of oil. Some offers were withdrawn or redirected to private groups such as the Red Cross. The rest has been delayed by red tape and bureaucratic limits on how it can be spent.

The Highly Broken Administration

Posted 3/14/07 at 11:38am by jamie

When a company continues to fail miserably the answer is not to fire all the employees, but rather the CEO. If a team goes on a multi-season losing streak, the players aren't all replaced, but rather the coach. So why doesn't the same apply to the White House?

In the past we have seen great evidence of the failed cronyism that is the White House. Our first glimpse actually started during hurricane Katrina, when Mike Brown became a household name synonymous with failure. During that same time we had another name come to center stage, Harriet Miers, a name now resurfacing. Last year we saw the removal of Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense and some top brass changes in the military. Those can be attributed to the failed Iraq policy.

Now in the past month the failed state of cronyism is at an all time high. We have already seen three top military officials fired of the Walter Reed fiasco, something that top Republicans knew was going on since the early months of the war. Dick Cheney's chief of staff has been convicted of numerous crimes, including the obstructing the investigation into the outing of a CIA agent. This week Alberto Gonzales' chief of staff resigns amid all the turmoil over the fired U.S.As.

For a person who ran a campaign on "accountability", Bush sure has had none. Instead he constantly brushes off the problems and puts the blame onto cronies that have emerged. Take Harriet Miers. She is now becoming the fall person for the White House's involvement in the U.S.A. purge:

With Mr. Bush traveling in Mexico, the White House insisted that the president’s role had been minimal and laid the blame primarily on Harriet E. Miers, who was White House counsel when the prosecutors lost their jobs and who stepped down in January.

Bush Still Wants His Cronies

Posted 10/6/06 at 12:14pm by jamie

Is the President an idiot? That was the question that caused a bunch of heat when Joe Scarborough asked it a couple of months ago. Well consider Bush's latest signing statement and then do the math:

President Bush this week asserted that he has the executive authority to disobey a new law in which Congress has set minimum qualifications for future heads of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Congress passed the law last week as a response to FEMA's poor handling of Hurricane Katrina. The agency's slow response to flood victims exposed the fact that Michael Brown, Bush's choice to lead the agency, had been a politically connected hire with no prior experience in emergency management.

To shield FEMA from cronyism, Congress established new job qualifications for the agency's director in last week's homeland security bill. The law says the president must nominate a candidate who has ``a demonstrated ability in and knowledge of emergency management" and ``not less than five years of executive leadership."

Bush signed the homeland-security bill on Wednesday morning. Then, hours later, he issued a signing statement saying he could ignore the new restrictions. Bush maintains that under his interpretation of the Constitution, the FEMA provision interfered with his power to make personnel decisions.

So Bush wants to be able to hire another Michael Brown to head FEMA. A smart man would take Congress' advice and make sure that the person they hire is qualified for the job. Not in Bush's mind. I guess since he is not a smart man, then he must be an idiot.

The GOP Still Hates The People

Posted 8/26/06 at 4:01pm by jamie

Of course Bush would take his weekly radio address to try and prop up his image on Katrina:

Nearly one year after Hurricane Katrina created a humanitarian and political crisis, President George W. Bush said on Saturday the storm showed the government was unprepared to respond to a disaster of that magnitude and revealed "deep-seated poverty" in America.

Political fallout from the hurricane, which killed more than 1,000 people and displaced tens of thousands, was severe for Bush last year, sending his public opinion ratings to new lows amid widespread criticism the government's response had been too slow.

He returns next week to the scene of one of the worst natural disasters in American history to meet with local residents and officials to review progress in rebuilding New Orleans and communities along the Gulf Coast that were flooded and destroyed.

His trip to Louisiana and Mississippi comes as the election season heats up with Democrats trying to seize control of Congress from the president's Republican Party in November congressional elections.

"One year after the storms, the Gulf Coast continues down the long road to recovery. In Mississippi and Louisiana, we can see many encouraging signs of recovery and renewal, and many reminders that hard work still lies ahead," Bush said.

"We will stay until the job is done," he pledged in his weekly radio address from Maine, where he was visiting family.

So what has Bush and the Republican controlled congress done this year to address these problems Katrina "showed" us? Well let they tried to cut taxes for the wealthiest 1% of this nation again. They enacted the new Medicare program that ends up costing the poorest of our seniors more than it did before. They tried to ban gay marriage and flag burning.

Homeland Security - More Of The Same

Posted 7/27/06 at 10:12pm by jamie

More like Homeland Waste:

The multibillion-dollar surge in federal contracting to bolster the nation's domestic defenses in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks has been marred by extensive waste and misspent funds, according to a new bipartisan congressional report.

Lawmakers say that since the Homeland Security Department's formation in 2003, an explosion of no-bid deals and a critical shortage of trained government contract managers have created a system prone to abuse. Based on a comprehensive survey of hundreds of government audits, 32 Homeland Security Department contracts worth a total of $34 billion have "experienced significant overcharges, wasteful spending, or mismanagement," according to the report, which is slated for release today and was obtained in advance by The Washington Post.

The value of contracts awarded without full competition increased 739 percent from 2003 to 2005, to $5.5 billion, more than half the $10 billion awarded by the department that year. By comparison, the agency awarded a total of $3.5 billion in contracts in 2003, the year it was created.

Among the contracts that went awry were deals for hiring airport screeners, inspecting airport luggage, detecting radiation at the nation's ports, securing the borders and housing Hurricane Katrina evacuees. Investigators looking into those contracts turned up whole security systems that needed to be scrapped, contractor bills for luxury hotel rooms and Homeland Security officials who bought personal items with government credit cards.

Yeah, the Republicans are really the ones who are up on homeland security, national defense and fiscal responsibility. The Midas touch - what the Republicans touch turns to gold (for corporations).

FEMA Gag Order Gets Some Local Level Attention

Posted 7/26/06 at 2:45pm by jamie

While the media has been strongly focused on the Middle East, a bombshell was set off last week with Hurricane Katrina. I posted about FEMA not allowing citizens in their trailer parks access to reporters. The only way they can talk to reporters is if a FEMA official is with them (sounds like the old Saddam "minders"). This not only infringes on the first amendment of the victims, but also the first amendment protection our free press and the very fabric of our society.

Well the story is starting to get a little more notice and even has some law makers in an outrage:

Members of Louisiana’s congressional delegation said Monday that FEMA’s policy restricting media access to residents living in FEMA-managed trailer parks is absurd, outrageous and denies park residents their rights as American citizens.

“FEMA just strikes you as a bureaucracy that’s out of control,” said U.S. Rep. Bobby Jindal, R-Kenner. “You don’t lose your fundamental rights just because you’re living in temporary housing. It’s an outrageous pattern of behavior.”

Jindal was referring to a July 15 article in which The Advocate detailed an incident in a Federal Emergency Management Agency-operated trailer park in Morgan City where a reporter and photographer were ordered off of the site.

The two had been invited into a trailer occupied by resident Dekotha Devall and her family. But during the interview a security guard ordered the reporter and photographer to leave.

The security guard called the police after the reporter attempted to give Devall a business card, an act the guard said was forbidden

Flooding The Tunnels

Posted 7/7/06 at 3:35pm by jamie

You can tell elections are getting closer. Instead of raising the terror level, we start to hear more about how the government is "uncovering terrorist plots":

The FBI has uncovered what officials consider a serious plot by jihadists to bomb the Holland Tunnel in hopes of causing a torrent of water to deluge lower Manhattan, the Daily News has learned. The terrorists sought to drown the Financial District as New Orleans was by Hurricane Katrina, sources said. They also wanted to attack subways and other tunnels.

Counterterrorism officials are alarmed by the "lone wolf" terror plot because they allegedly got a pledge of financial and tactical support from Jordanian associates of top terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi before he was killed in Iraq, a counterterrorism source told The News.

It's not clear, however, if any cash or assistance was delivered.

It is going to be interesting as cases like this and the one in Miami get to court. How much of a plan are these? Are they some idiots just playing jihadist or are there really substance to them?

Something else interesting to consider when you here this story is why the government choose to cut New York's homeland security funding? I thought they didn't have any targets that terrorists would want to hit. If this claim is true then heads need to roll in Homeland Security. It also further discredits Bush's continued claim of "we are fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them here".

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter