hypocrisy

Republicans Filibustering Republicans?!?!

Posted 9/20/06 at 2:15pm by jamie

This is the absolute proof of the hypocrisy the Republican party exhibits:

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist signaled yesterday that he and other White House allies will filibuster a bill dealing with the interrogation and prosecution of detainees if they cannot persuade a rival group of Republicans to rewrite key provisions opposed by President Bush.

Remember the "nuclear option" from last year? A filibuster is suppose to be a valuable tool to help protect the minority in Congress, yet the Republicans wanted to strip that. Now the Republican leadership, in their sense of becoming a dictatorship, wants to use the filibuster to help rubber stamp George Bush even more. I thought everything deserved "an up or down vote"? That's right. Things like that only apply if the other side of the aisle has an objection.

Mary Cheney Upset With John Kerry Two Years Later

Posted 5/10/06 at 4:58pm by jamie

John at AmericaBLOG has a great entry about our vice-President's daughter:

Welcome to Mary Cheney's million-dollar closet. It's still a bit stuffy in here as a lot of things haven't been totally cleared out.

For someone who has been "out" for a decade, Mary still shows major signs of just-coming-out syndrome. It's what Jeff Gannon is going through, and what many if not most gays go through (especially conservative ones) when they first come to terms with being gay. They start being publicly gay, sometimes say good things, but more often than not their internalized homophobia comes slipping out.

Check out the rest of his entry as he untangles this web of hypocrisy.

The Chimp Shows His Hypocrisy

Posted 3/28/06 at 9:16pm by jamie

Yup - it is freedom and democracy being spread old Bush style:

Senior Shiite politicians said today that the American ambassador has told Shiite officials to inform the Iraqi prime minister that President Bush does not want him to remain the country's leader in the next government.

It is the first time the Americans have directly intervened in the furious debate over the country's top job, the politicians said, and it is inflaming tensions between the Americans and some Shiite leaders.

The ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, told the head of the main Shiite political bloc at a meeting last Saturday to pass a "personal message from President Bush" on to the prime minister, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, who the Shiites insist should stay in his post for four more years, said Redha Jowad Taki, a Shiite politician and member of Parliament who was at the meeting.

Ambassador Khalilzad said that President Bush "doesn't want, doesn't support, doesn't accept" Mr. Jaafari to be the next prime minister, according to Mr. Taki, a senior aide to Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, the head of the Shiite bloc. It was the first "clear and direct message" from the Americans on the issue of the candidate for prime minister, Mr. Taki said.

Now how many other countries out there don't want Bush as our President? Hell how many Americans don't want Bush as our President? This is just another example of the typical BUSHIT that gets spread by this administration

About That Joint Chiefs' Letter

Posted 2/1/06 at 11:43pm by jamie

You may have read about the letter sent to the Washington Post from the Joint
Chiefs in response to a cartoon. If not then head over to

AMERICABlog
for the details.

I am not in total agreement on this issue. I believe in the freedom of speech
and that the Joint Chiefs should also be allowed to express that freedom.
However, if they are going to show outrage over a political cartoon in a
newspaper, then they should also show outrage to groups like
Westboro Baptist Church.

The Joint Chiefs make the point that the families and individuals who are
hurt feel great pain and loss. That pain and loss is also great during the
funerals of fallen soldiers but there is no proof the Joint Chiefs have
expressed any outrage over this. How about outrage when right wing pundits also
insult Casey Sheehan because his mother is a war protestor? Those pundits
deserve the same type of outrage that the Washington Post was given.

Last night our President mentioned the word "freedom" a total of 17 times.
Cindy Sheehan had her freedom taken away last night when she was arrested at the
Capital Building. Now we find out her only crime was being in the same place as
a Capital police officer who was ignorant to the rules and laws of the land.
Outrage should be expressed from the Joint Chiefs to the officers who arrested
Cindy and also escorted

Mrs. Young
out last night. The Joint Chiefs are leading the fight to spread
freedom and that fight doesn't stop here at home.

New Year, New Scandal

Posted 12/30/05 at 4:40pm by jamie

We knew it was coming but it has now been made official. The Justice
Department is set to launch an investigation into who leaked the secret
eavesdropping program to the press. This is according to the

Associated Press
:

The Justice Department has opened an investigation into the leak of
classified information about President Bush's secret domestic spying
program, Justice officials said Friday.

The officials, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the
probe, said the inquiry will focus on disclosures to The New York Times
about warrantless surveillance conducted by the National Security Agency
since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

View complete article

here
.

The hypocrisy of the administration shines through in this action. The
President was eager to get an investigation going, which he made obvious in his
press conference last week. I keep wondering what would happen if this was
leaked by a close adviser of Bush. Will he once again resort to a song and dance
changing the story of what would merit an offence worthy of termination?

Does Bush Feel Ethics Should Apply To The White House?

Posted 11/29/05 at 11:35pm by jamie

Bush publicly scolded Duke Cunningham today over his crimes of taking bribes
in exchange for government contracts. Of course Bush speak is nothing more than
hypocrisy in action:

"Any member of Congress, Republican or Democrat, must take their office
seriously and the ethics seriously," Bush said to reporters during a trip to
Texas.

Full article

link

Funny how he addressed ethics as being taken seriously in Congress. No
mention about the ethics problems surrounding his own administration and the
leak investigation. I wonder if Bush realizes the company involved in this
bribery scandal did some work in the White House including in his own office?

Government procurement records show that MZM, which Wade started in 1993,
did not report any revenue from prime contract awards until 2003. Most of
its revenue has come from the agreement the Pentagon just cut off. But
over the past three years it was also awarded several contracts, worth more
than $600,000, by the Executive Office of the President. They include a
$140,000 deal for office furniture in 2002 and several for unspecified
"intelligence services."

Full article

link

Let me guess - Bush will be a victim of Cunningham's scam on that one.

A Sad Hypocrisy

Posted 7/9/05 at 3:01am by jamie

Protests were being held this week outside of the
courthouse in sunny Aruba. The people gathering were protesting the negative
press their justice system was getting by the United States Media and also by
the mother of missing teen Natalee Holloway.

Beth Holloway-Twitty, the mother of the missing teen spoke
out this week against the legal system of Aruba, and the two suspects, Deepak
Kalpoe and Satish Kalpoe, after they were released this week by the Aruban
judge. They were not released for no reason; they were released for lack of
evidence. This is the same type of protection we are guaranteed under our own
law.

Beth has come out and apologized since then, and stated she
made the comments out of anger and frustration.

The day of these protests, I was watching Scarborough
Country on MSNBC. Joe Scarborough, the host, was talking with an ex-Diplomat of
the tiny Caribbean Island. The ex diplomat was involved in the protesting, and
tried to explain to Joe that the Dutch law that the island of Aruba follows has
been around for centuries, and in fact is much older than our current law. Joe
would not accept this answer and went on the defense of American justice.

I found a sad and tragic irony in this coverage. The same
week that we learn about Joseph Duncan, the sick individual who kidnapped Shasta
Groene and possibly killed four other members of her family, and how he slipped
through our legal system prior to his crimes, we hear our reporters criticizing
other countries judicial system. If our judicial system was infallible as Joe
hinted during his interview, then Duncan would not have been released on a
$15,000 bond in March when he appeared in court for molesting a child, and was
also a repeat offender.

PlameGame Update

Posted 7/9/05 at 2:45am by jamie

It has been almost a week since the rumors started
surfacing on the internet that Karl Rove is indeed the person who ousted former
CIA agent Valerie Plame. Ironically this was not questioned once this week at
any of the White House press briefings.

The silence could only be a sign of keeping a lid on it due
to pending litigation. Rove’s lawyers have already been stating that he did not
“knowingly” disclose the identity of Valerie Plame. Coincidently that is the
same language that appears in the very law that protects their identity, which
could mean that Karl Rove did reveal her identity but didn’t know he was doing
so.

This case is going to get very interesting in the next week
or so. Rep. John Conyers has already prepared a letter to the White House
demanding that Karl Rove either answers the allegations or resigns. I can not
help but agree with that statement. If an officer of the law is under a criminal
investigation, he is placed on a paid administrative leave. Should this not be
more important for someone who has access to information pertinent to national
security, especially in this time of war?

The blogosphere has been on a constant chatter of this
story. The right wing is defending him by saying at most all he did was commit
an act of perjury. The hypocrisy in that is perjury was the same crime leading
to the impeachment of Bill Clinton. It was an intolerable crime when a Democrat
was in the White House, but now that the Right has control, perjury is not that
horrid of a crime. Goes to show you that lying is ok if they are the ones doing
it.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter