oversight

A Perfect Need For Oversight

Posted 12/19/06 at 5:27pm by jamie

Sure - we can fork out all this money:

The U.S. government already has a courthouse at Guantanamo Bay, but the Pentagon isn't satisfied, CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports. It plans to spend $100 million of your tax dollars to build a huge new facility just down the hill.

"This is very expensive for the number of cases, 60, which they anticipate trying," says Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

That's right, a $100 million courthouse to try about 60 cases. That's $1.6 million per defendant ... just for the building. The trials will cost many millions more.

So let me guess - Halliburton is tapped for the contract, so Dick Cheney become even richer at the expense of America. Why can't they just use a tent, with some armed soldiers to make sure the defendants don't run? This is just another sign of pure government waste and taxpayer fraud at the behest of George W. Bush and company. Congress must hold serious oversights as soon as the Democrats take control and put an end to this. Furthermore, the companies who have become rich from this crap need to repay the money to the taxpayers. I want mine back - don't you?

Bush Fires The Only Oversight In Iraq

Posted 11/3/06 at 3:34pm by jamie

The key issue of next week's elections is Iraq and a hopeful start to oversight of the disaster Bush got us into. Now we find out that the administration gets rid of the only person who was conducting oversight in the war.

Investigations led by a Republican lawyer named Stuart W. Bowen Jr. in Iraq have sent American occupation officials to jail on bribery and conspiracy charges, exposed disastrously poor construction work by well-connected companies like Halliburton and Parsons, and discovered that the military did not properly track hundreds of thousands of weapons it shipped to Iraqi security forces.

And tucked away in a huge military authorization bill that President Bush signed two weeks ago is what some of Mr. Bowen’s supporters believe is his reward for repeatedly embarrassing the administration: a pink slip.

Yes - how dare we go after the corporations. We are expected to serve for them and our soldiers are to die for them. Fuck everyone - as long as the upper echelons of our country are doing good.

I don't know about you, but I definitely have had enough of this deadly Republican greed. We have been in Iraq as long as we were fighting WW2 and that war had a hell of a lot more oversight than Iraq ever will.

The Republicans Quiet Scare Tactic

Posted 10/25/06 at 7:12pm by jamie

Bush's biggest problem is he lives in the past. He doesn't realize this great new thing out there called the "internets" and exactly how powerful it is. Take for example when Bush tries to change his story and then lie about what he previously said:

Oops. Well I am sure that hasn't happened before.

Oh well I guess it has. Our President isn't just incompetent - he is a total moron. With someone this out of touch with reality and such an ambition to lie to the American people, don't we require a Congress that will exercise the Constitutional mandate of oversight? Every single American deserves it. Our forefathers deserve it. Our nation deserves it. In 13 days we can change the course in our Nation and hopefully hold Bush accountable for his (in)actions.

How A Democratic Strategist Should Respond

Posted 10/2/06 at 6:48pm by jamie

This should be required viewing and training for all DNC Strategists from here on out. This was awesome (h/t Christy)

The Republicans want to try and put out the ethics problems involving Democrats, but the fact of the matter is there are only a handful. They can name 3 or 4 and we can respond with 30 or 40. The problems within the Republican party are at least 10 fold compared to that of the Democrat party. Why is that? Could is be that the Republicans find no need for oversight? Dennis Hastert and Tom Delay kept the Ethics Committee from doing their job for over a year and look what happened. The Republican controlled House and Senate REFUSE to question any activity in the White House and look what has happened there - you got one ex-official in jail (Safavian) and one going on trial (Libby).

From The Mind Of Orwell

Posted 6/15/06 at 2:56pm by jamie

We are now reduced from being Americans to being a string of ones and zeros:

The Pentagon pays a private company to compile data on teenagers it can recruit to the military. The Homeland Security Department buys consumer information to help screen people at borders and detect immigration fraud.

As federal agencies delve into the vast commercial market for consumer information, such as buying habits and financial records, they are tapping into data that would be difficult for the government to accumulate but that has become a booming business for private companies.

Industry executives, analysts and watchdog groups say the federal government has significantly increased what it spends to buy personal data from the private sector, along with the software to make sense of it, since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. They expect the sums to keep rising far into the future.

So what protections are being put in place to make sure people don't misuse this information? With the growing number of "computer thefts" (like I believe they are really being stolen), more of our information can be made available for illegal activities.

Another protection that needs to be put in place is making sure this information is not made available to elected officials. It could quickly be abused by politicians hoping to gain the edge in targeting mailings and phone calls.

This is a program that needs very serious oversight by not only Congress but also the Judicial branch. It is the only way to protect our democracy from a sure demise.

War Drums Are Getting Louder

Posted 4/12/06 at 7:13pm by jamie

Here we go - reliving the year 2003 all over again:

Iran, which is defying United Nations Security Council demands to cease its nuclear program, may be capable of making a nuclear bomb within 16 days if it goes ahead with plans to install thousands of centrifuges at its Natanz plant, a U.S. State Department official said.

``Natanz was constructed to house 50,000 centrifuges,'' Stephen Rademaker, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation, told reporters today in Moscow. ``Using those 50,000 centrifuges they could produce enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon in 16 days.''

In fact, Iran will move forward to ``industrial scale'' uranium enrichment involving 54,000 centrifuges at Natanz, the Associated Press quoted deputy nuclear chief Mohammad Saeedi as telling state-run television today.

If we are planning on attacking Iran then we better be damn sure what we are claiming is true. This means sharing all the information with both parties so oversight can take place properly.

AWW The Pentagon Says They Made a Mistake - BUSHIT

Posted 4/5/06 at 10:41pm by jamie

Well it looks like the Pentagon has an excuse for spying on peace activists:

The Pentagon said on Wednesday a review launched after revelations that it had collected data on U.S. peace activists found that roughly 260 entries in a classified database of possible terrorist threats should not have been kept there.

But the review reaffirmed the value of the so-called Talon reporting system on potential threats to Pentagon personnel or facilities by international terrorists, said Bryan Whitman, a senior Pentagon spokesman. He said the Pentagon was putting in place new safeguards and oversight intended to prevent improper information from going in the database.

Whitman said "less than 2 percent" of the more than 13,000 database entries provided through the Talon system "should not have been there or should have been removed at a certain point in time."

So why were they listed in any database in the first place? Is our government now in a practice of keeping tabs on those who do not agree with their policies? If that is the case then every Republican should be listed in there from the Clinton years.

This is a problem with the cyber age - it is too damn easy to place blame on others. It can be a computer error or a data entry error. It doesn't matter which excuse they want to use the question still needs to be asked - If they were in the wrong database then what database should they have been in?

Hey Stupid - The Constitution Is Not An Addendum

Posted 3/24/06 at 4:10pm by jamie

Well imagine this, Bush says he is not "obligated" to follow the oversight provisions in the new Patriot Act:

When President Bush signed the reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act this month, he included an addendum saying that he did not feel obliged to obey requirements that he inform Congress about how the FBI was using the act's expanded police powers.

The bill contained several oversight provisions intended to make sure the FBI did not abuse the special terrorism-related powers to search homes and secretly seize papers. The provisions require Justice Department officials to keep closer track of how often the FBI uses the new powers and in what type of situations. Under the law, the administration would have to provide the information to Congress by certain dates.

This is the exact same thing he did on the torture bill - he added an addendum saying he is not obligated to follow it. Amazing. How about an addendum stating you don't have to follow the constitution? That is basically what this is. Bush's actions are ones that any fourth grade social studies student would know is wrong. He is nothing short of being a dictator now.

More "Support Of Our Troops" By Halliburton

Posted 3/16/06 at 4:53pm by jamie

When it comes to either supporting our troops or Cheney's retirement then Cheney's retirement will always win:

Halliburton Co. failed to protect the water supply it is paid to purify for U.S. soldiers throughout Iraq, in one instance missing contamination that could have caused "mass sickness or death," an internal company report concluded.

The report, obtained by The Associated Press, said the company failed to assemble and use its own water purification equipment, allowing contaminated water directly from the Euphrates River to be used for washing and laundry at Camp Ar Ramadi in Ramadi, Iraq.

The problems discovered last year at that site — poor training, miscommunication and lax record keeping — occurred at Halliburton's other operations throughout Iraq, the report said.

So now we can add contaminated water to the list of ways Halliburton has shown their support for our troops. That list also contains items like serving food over a year out of date and over billing our government. The worst part is Republicans refuse to hold any kind of oversight hearing into these matters. Sounds to me like the Republicans are more interested in profits than the welfare of our troops also.

Can you imagine if Halliburton was some big blue company that miraculously got this contract and did these things? The right would be calling them traitors for their negligence saying it is helping our enemies. Well since they are not that big blue company, their actions are appropriate in the eyes of Republican leadership. The fact is they are helping our enemies out. Sick soldiers can not fight and serving them tainted water and food will guarantee they become sick. Sounds to me like the Republicans are the ones now supporting our enemy.

Tapping Without Warrants - A GOP Plan

Posted 3/9/06 at 3:09pm by jamie

The plan by Senate Republicans to step up oversight of the National Security Agency's domestic surveillance program would also give legislative sanction for the first time to long-term eavesdropping on Americans without a court warrant, legal experts said on Wednesday.

Civil liberties advocates called the proposed oversight inadequate and the licensing of eavesdropping without warrants unnecessary and unwise. But the Republican senators who drafted the proposal said it represented a hard-wrung compromise with the White House, which strongly opposed any Congressional interference in the eavesdropping program.

Read the rest of this at the New York Times.

This is really scary. Since when can Congress write legislation that goes against the Constitution without doing it in the form of an amendment? I suspect the first tests of this in the courts will not come out favorably for Congress. Of course now that Bush has stacked the Supreme Court anything is possible there.

Like I have said before. Communism isn't dead. It is just in the process of being reborn here.

Now We See Problems?

Posted 3/5/06 at 5:31pm by jamie

From Reuters:

The secretive U.S. government foreign investment review process that approved an Arab company's deal to assume management of terminals at six U.S. ports is "deeply flawed" and should be revamped, a leading lawmaker said on Sunday.

Senate Homeland Security Chairman Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, said she and the panel's top Democrat, Sen. Joseph Lieberman (news, bio, voting record) of Connecticut, will introduce legislation next week to overhaul the process and give the lead to the Department of Homeland Security.

I don't think the problem is the program being just flawed. The problem lies much deeper. It lies within an administration that has gone unchecked for so long that they feel they can do whatever they want. They are like kids - if you let them continue to misbehave then they start believing it is ok.

This problem has been created by the Republican party. It doesn't matter if the White House is the same party as the party which controls Congress. As matter of fact, yes it does. When the same party in the White House is the same that controls Congress then a need for greater oversight is a must. It puts the White House in a dangerous "comfort zone" because they don't have to worry as much about being questioned. If current times teaches us anything its that party loyalty can be a devastating factor on a nation.

34% Approval Rating

Posted 2/28/06 at 12:27am by jamie

According to a new CBS poll, Bush has hit an all time low. Cheney is at 18% approval rating and Bush's handling of Iraq is at a mere 30%.

Some other interesting numbers:

  • 70% oppose the port deal.
  •  62% think things are going badly in Iraq
  • 43% approve Bush's handling of terrorism. Down 9 points since last month
  • 53% have an unfavorable view of Bush as compared to 29% who view him as favorable
  • 43% think the President has the authority to authorize wiretaps to fight terrorism without a warrant
  • 64% are very or somewhat concerned about losing civil liberties because of Bush's anti-terrorism measures
  • 28% approval for Congress.

The CBS page also has a link to another interesting poll on Katrina. The numbers in that poll don't paint a pretty picture for the administration either.

Looking at these numbers, Congress could easily get their approval up. How is that? Start holding this administration accountable and do more of their oversight. Their rubberstamp attitude is killing them.

Who Is In Charge?

Posted 2/22/06 at 4:54pm by jamie

Now Bush didn't know about the port deal?

President Bush was unaware of the pending sale of shipping operations at
six major U.S. seaports to a state-owned business in the United Arab
Emirates until the deal already had been approved by his administration, the
White House said Wednesday.

Defending the deal anew, the administration also said that it should have
briefed Congress sooner about the transaction, which has triggered a major
political backlash among both Republicans and Democrats.

Bush on Tuesday brushed aside objections by leaders in the Senate and
House that the $6.8 billion sale could raise risks of terrorism at American
ports. In a forceful defense of his administration's earlier approval of the
deal, he pledged to veto any bill Congress might approve to block the
agreement involving the sale of a British company to the Arab firm.

Article continues

here
.

Ok Congress didn't know, Bush didn't know, the Joint Chiefs didn't know,
Rumsfeld didn't know. Who the hell is running our government? This is a total
lack of oversight or a major lie. The

GOP congressional hearings
on this subject should get really interesting.

The Truth Is Coming Out - Time To Impeach!

Posted 12/20/05 at 12:39am by jamie

Everything we have fought against as a nation over history is being destroyed
as we speak. At the head of the destruction is George Bush. Fortunately members
of Congress are starting to awaken from their slumber and realize the dreadful
road Bush is leading us down and coming out against it.

In his press conference today Bush vowed to continue to use these illegal
wiretaps and said repeatedly that leaders of Congress have been briefed more
than a dozen times on the program. Democrats are coming out and countering
Bush's lie with facts and statements that show they were not invoved in that
many meetings and all facts were not disclosed to them.

The harshest proof comes from Senator Jay Rockefeller who released a letter
today that he wrote to Cheney in 2003 about his concerns over the program:

July 17, 2003 Dear Mr. Vice President, I am writing to reiterate my
concern regarding the sensitive intelligence issues we discussed today with
the DCI, DIRNSA, and Chairman Roberts and our House Intelligence Committee
counterparts.

Clearly the activities we discussed raise profound oversight issues. As
you know, I am neither a technician or an attorney. Given the security
restrictions associated with this information, and my inability to consult
staff or counsel on my own, I feel unable to fully evaluate, much less
endorse these activities.

As I reflected on the meeting today, and the future we face, John
Poindexter's TIA project sprung to mind, exacerbating my concern regarding
the direction the Administration is moving with regard to security,
technology, and surveiliance.

Without more information and the ability to draw on any independent legal
or techical expertise, I simply cannot satisfy lingering concerns raised by
the briefing we received.

Recruitment Woes Highlighted In New GAO Report

Posted 11/18/05 at 3:24pm by jamie

The Government Accounting Office (GAO) released a report today showing that
the recruitment levels of our military are worse than we had actually been told.
The following is a highlight of the shortfalls as described in this

New York Times
article.

  • Army, National Guard, Marines  - Signed up 1/3 of special forces,
    translators and intelligence specialists it aimed for
  • Army and Marines - 20% shortfall in roadside bomb defusers over the last
    two years
  • Military overall has failed to fill 41% of its combat and non-combat
    positions
  • Marines only reached 75% of Middle East linguist goal last year

According to the report, if this trend continues it could lead to serious
troubles for our military in the long term range. Over all the report shows that
Congress and the American people have been mislead by the Pentagon when it comes
to our military. It calls for greater oversight by Congress who sets personnel
budgets for the Pentagon.

Most importantly, this report gives a clear sense that if we engage in
anymore military actions then we will most likely be facing a draft.

There is a silver lining to this cloud. It should really up the great
recruiting efforts of
Operation Yellow Elephant
.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter