pet projects

Helping Our Enemies In The Financial Jihad

Posted 5/23/11 at 8:55am by jamie

One of the long known goals of Osama bin Laden was to financially break the United States:

A key facet of bin Laden's anti-American warfare has always been economic. It's a lesson he drew from the Afghan-Soviet war, in which he first served as a financier of mujahidin efforts and then as a fighter. He watched the Soviet Union withdraw from Afghanistan in defeat and then dissolve altogether in 1991. Bin Laden asserted on multiple occasions that the mujahidin were responsible for destroying the Soviet empire. Whether or not he's right, he clearly believed that the high costs imposed by the Afghan-Soviet war prevented the Soviet Union from adapting to other challenges, such as grain shortages and a collapse in world oil prices.

When you consider the hundreds of billions we spend every year in defense, including a large chunk of money just for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and couple that with our dwindling economy, we can see this is one goal he might achieve, though he didn't live to see it.

Thinking of that makes stories like this all the more infuriating:

Hard-charging Republicans who rallied voters last year with cries of "Stop the spending, ban the earmarks" are quietly offering a more familiar Washington refrain now they're in Congress – not in my backyard.

Now Republicans Want To Cut Earmarks

Posted 1/26/08 at 10:15am by jamie

Funny how they were so against ethics reform a few months ago, but now they want earmark reform. Yes we do need it, but I can't help think that this is an election year ploy, especially when they are issuing this statement from a lobbyist funded retreat. They also had no problems with earmarks a couple of years ago when people like Ted Stevens was trying to build the bridge to nowhere.

So why want the change now? The most obvious answer lies in the calendar. Republicans know there is a really good chance they will loose the White House this year and even fall into a deeper minority status in both houses. If this doesn't help give them some votes then it might end up stopping Earmarks in a time when D.C. is controlled by Democrats and Republicans will not be able to get any of their own pet projects through.

More Signs Of Republican Power Collapse

Posted 11/16/05 at 2:17pm by jamie

A new sign of turmoil over the neo-con ran House is emerging. This time the
moderate Republicans are showing concern over the leadership of the House and
feel that the agenda being pushed by Tom Delay, Dennis Hassert and Roy Blunt
does not fulfill the agenda of the entire Republican party.

Five-term Republican Rep. Charles Bass said this week his party’s leaders
in the House of Representatives are more concerned about their own pet
projects than the GOP’s “fundamental principles.”

Bass, co-chair of a group of about 35 moderate House Republicans called
the “Tuesday Group,” is calling for new elections in leadership next year
“so we have a fresh slate of officers outside of the speaker for the next
session of the Congress.”

His comments came in interviews yesterday with the New Hampshire Union
Leader and on Monday with Boston radio station WBUR-FM.

He said he is not interested in running for a leadership post himself and
was not specifically calling for anyone in leadership to be “thrown out.” He
also said he has no specific action in mind to try to force a vote.

“I’m not starting a movement. I’m not leading a revolution,” Bass said.
“I’m just stating an opinion.”

Bass noted that he has expressed concern about the direction of the
Republican Party in Washington “all along, but the difference is that
Republicans are now down and everyone is listening to this sort of thing.”

Article continues

here
.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter