phone hacking

Accusation: Hacking Widely Discussed At News of the World

Posted 8/16/11 at 10:13am by jamie

We haven't heard much from the News Corp/Murdoch hacking scandal lately. I think that is all about to change:

A former News of the World reporter has alleged that there was a massive cover-up of phone hacking at the paper.

Clive Goodman, the former royal reporter jailed for his role in phone hacking, wrote a letter in 2007 claiming that phone hacking was "widely discussed" at editorial meetings, and that former editor Andy Coulson offered to let him keep his job if he agreed to say in court that he was a rogue element within the paper.

The claims are deeply damaging to Coulson, who has always maintained that he did not know about the hacking going on at his paper. They are also politically perilous for Cameron, who took Coulson on even as evidence mounted against him. Moreover, they raise fresh danger for James and Rupert Murdoch, both of whom claimed to know nothing about hacking. Before the documents were released, the select committee for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport announced that it is "likely" to recall James Murdoch when Parliament resumes in September.

The letter was one of several documents published by a parliamentary committee on Tuesday afternoon. The Guardian's Nick Davies saw the letters before they were published.

This should raise a lot of alarms, not only in the U.K., but also in the other nation's now investigating the Murdoch owned company.

It's Time For Full Blown Investigations Into News Corp, Fox and the Murdochs!

Posted 7/18/11 at 3:33pm by jamie

It's looking like Fox could be involved in some phone hacking also:

According to former Fox News executive Dan Cooper, whose gripes with his former employer run quite deep after being fired in 1996, Fox News chief Roger Ailes allegedly had him design the so-called "Brain Room" to facilitate counter-intelligence efforts and other "black ops."

In a lengthy 2008 diatribe said to have doubled as a book pitch, Cooper claimed his own phone records had been hacked by Fox News employees, who he says used them to pinpoint him as a source used by David Brock, who founded liberal watchdog group Media Matters.

"Ailes knew I had given Brock the interview," he wrote. "Certainly Brock didn't tell him. Of course. Fox News had gotten Brock's telephone records from the phone company, and my phone number was on the list. Deep in the bowels of 1211 Avenue of the Americas, News Corporation's New York headquarters, was what Roger called the Brain Room. Most people thought it was simply the research department of Fox News. But unlike virtually everybody else, because I had to design and build the Brain Room, I knew it also housed a counterintelligence and black ops office. So accessing phone records was easy pie."

Given what's happening in London, this report must be taken very seriously. It's time for congressional hearing and a full blown investigation by the Justice Department. If News Corp is found to have engaged in this highly illegal activity, Ruppert Murdoch, Roger Ailes and anyone else involved must be prosecuted to the fullest extent and News Corp must be taken over by the government and broken up. If that doesn't happen then why even say we are nation of justice?

NOTW Whistle Blower Found Dead

Posted 7/18/11 at 3:29pm by jamie

This story just keeps taking more new and interesting turns:

In another twist in the News Of The World scandal, a former reporter for the tabloid who initially alleged that editor Andy Coulson knew about the practice of phone hacking by his staff, was reportedly found dead Monday.

The Guardian reports that though police wouldn't confirm the identity of the man found dead, it is believed to be Sean Hoare, formerly of NOTW and The Sun, who worked under Coulson but was fired for alcohol and drug problems in 2005. According to the police report, "the death is currently being treated as unexplained, but not thought to be suspicious. Police investigations into this incident are ongoing."

Bob Cesca adds this to the news that police aren't treating the death as "suspicious":

Whenever there’s a major conspiracy, and someone directly involved mysteriously dies, it’s always suspicious.

Which is a very true statement, but given the growing evidence against some high profile public officials in London, they are probably doing everything they can to keep this story turned down. It's quickly going to get to the point that Parliament has to intervene to get to the bottom of it.

Why Pay A Million Dollars To Change Anti-Bribery Laws When You Don't Bribe?

Posted 7/15/11 at 12:08pm by jamie

I think that is the $1 million dollar question right now:

Rupert Murdoch donated $1m to a pro-business lobby in the US months before the group launched a high-profile campaign to alter the anti-bribery law – the same law that could potentially be brought to bear against News Corporation over the phone-hacking scandal.

News Corporation contributed $1m to the US Chamber of Commerce last summer. In October the chamber put forward a six-point programme for amending the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, a law that punishes US-based companies for engaging in the bribery of foreign officials.

News Corp swears up and down that they don't bribe...honest engine!

News Corporation, which has its headquarters in the US, emphasises in its corporate literature that it has a global anti-bribery policy. "We don't offer, give, solicit or accept bribes or kickbacks, either in cash or in the form of any other thing or service of value," it says.

Sure - just like Fox news is "fair and balanced".

It seems like every statement made by News Corp or the Murdochs is quickly invalidated by new evidence coming out. News Corp doesn't engage in bribes, yet they decided to pay $1 million to lobbyists to soften anti-bribery laws? The old adage, "if you don't break the law, you have nothing to worry about" seems to come to mind.

News Corp Could Face Criminal Prosecution In The U.S.

Posted 7/11/11 at 9:09pm by jamie

The phone hacking scandal that has plagued the U.K. and gripped the attention of the world could really come home here in the U.S. now. News Corp is an American corporation, and while the entire hacking scandal has been solely in the U.K. (as far as we know), the U.S. does have laws against what News Corp is accused of:

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp could face probes by U.S. authorities for possibly violating bribery laws, compounding the media mogul's problems after a phone-hacking scandal in Britain.

The Obama administration has significantly stepped up enforcement of anti-bribery laws in the last two years, winning big settlements from the likes of Daimler AG and BAE Systems Plc by focusing on bribes they paid to foreign officials to win lucrative contracts.

Bribes for business have represented the bulk of these anti-bribery cases brought by the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission. It is unclear whether U.S. authorities would use scarce resources to probe News Corp over bribes allegedly paid to British police and other officials for information that became news scoops.

This would be huge if it actually happens. Some might claim that the law can't be enforced since the alleged crimes happened in another country, but that isn't the case. A prime example is child sex laws. Fly over sees to rent a 14 year old hooker and once back in the U.S., you can be arrested. This is something that has been on the books and successfully prosecuted for years.

Of course this also means that the Murdoch supporters on the right will soon cry political-foul. It's already starting. Here's how Drudge is pushing this story right now:

News Corp Shareholders Revolt

Posted 7/11/11 at 10:49am by jamie

U.S. shareholders of News Corp are not happy at all over the Murdoch empires handling of the phone hacking scandal.

Shareholders called it "inconceivable" that directors were not aware sooner of the questionable news practices that led to the closure of the News of the World tabloid, given that news of the hackings first surfaced in 2005.

This, the shareholders said, reflects a board that "provides no effective review or oversight," in a corporate culture "run amuck," according to the amended complaint dated July 8 and filed in Delaware Chancery Court. Lawyers for the shareholders provided a copy of the complaint on Monday.

I believe this story is as much about politics as it is media. For years the left has accused Fox and their parent company, News Corp, of engaging in questionable practices, yet the Fox defenders on the right would instantly denounce those claims as some conspiracy theory. Now as Murdoch's British empire crumbles in a wrath of corruption and illegal activities, maybe we can start looking more closely at exactly what is happening here in the U.S.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter