political purposes

As Hurricane Katia Comes, The Right Accuses Obama Of “Over-Hyping” Irene

Posted 8/30/11 at 10:03am by jamie

Irene hit New York as a category 1 hurricane, which is much less than the category 3 originally predicted. Since that happened the right has launched a major attack on the Obama administration, accusing them of “over-hyping” the hurricane for political purposes. This started with a bunch of links on Drudge over the weekend that quickly garnered the attention of the right blogosphere (see here and here for starters) and even Fox News. Of course this helped lead to the bigger issue on the right – getting rid of the National Weather Service:

As Hurricane Irene bears down on the East Coast, news stations bombard our televisions with constant updates from the National Hurricane Center.

While Americans ought to prepare for the coming storm, federal dollars need not subsidize their preparations. Although it might sound outrageous, the truth is that the National Hurricane Center and its parent agency, the National Weather Service, are relics from America’s past that have actually outlived their usefulness.

More Proof That Republicans Care Nothing About 9/11

Posted 3/23/10 at 10:20am by jamie

It isn’t no secret that Republicans care not about the thousands that perished on that September morning in 2001, but it does deserve a little reminder from time to time:

A Republican candidate for Governor of New York this morning reached new heights of rhetorical condemnation of health care legislation, comparing its passage to the attacks of September 11, 2001.

"The day that that bill was passed will be remembered just as 9/11 was remembered in history," Carl Paladino, a Buffalo businessman seeking the Republican and Conservative Party lines, told host Curtis Sliwa on AM 970 The Apple this morning. "It was an attempt by these people in Washington to defy the Constitution. It is clearly in conflict with all of the basic precepts of the Constitution."

So a bill meant to help ensure the well being of millions of our citizens is the equivalent to a violent attack that claimed the lives of thousands of innocents?

Perhaps Carl needs to learn the definition of terrorism:

  1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
  2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
  3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.

Read number 1 over and over again Carl and think about what you are doing. You are using a terrorist attack for political purpose. In other words, you are acting as a terrorist by proxy. So excuse me for telling you to go “Cheney yourself” since you are siding with our enemies.

Job Security

Posted 11/25/08 at 10:16am by jamie

white_collar_crime It looks like Harry Reid may not be going anywhere in the near future:

The lieutenant governor of Nevada says the state attorney general's office intends to have him indicted over how he handled a college savings program as state treasurer.

Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki said Monday he believes he is being targeted for political reasons by state Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto.

Krolicki is a Republican who's considering a run against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Masto is a Democrat. She says she cannot comment.

If Republicans want to regain control then perhaps they should stop breaking the law. I know I am just some Liberal blogger sitting in mommy and daddy’s basement, wearing my pajamas and sipping my latte while writing this, but something says that might be good advice for the GOP.

Oh – and isn’t it also funny how every time a Republican is under investigation, it is for “political purposes”? Yeah – I buy that load of crap also.

Must Read

Posted 3/15/08 at 7:45pm by jamie
Al Qaeda In Iraq Far Stronger Than Bush Administration Admitting

That's the headline from a new AP article. It appears the administration is continuing their path of lie and deceit to the American people.

Last week we found out the administration was planning on keeping secret the upcoming progress report for Iraq. Then yesterday John McCain said he thinks AQI will do larger attacks to derail our presidential election.

McCain and Bush plan on using Iraq for pure political purposes this year. They want to hide the facts of this failed policy in order to keep the killing of our soldiers going. It's amazing that they treat life so poorly.

Because Everything Is Political

Posted 3/30/07 at 11:50am by jamie

In the eyes of the White House:

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee sought more information yesterday about a presentation by a White House aide given to political appointees at the General Services Administration that discussed targeting 20 Democratic congressional candidates in the next election.

In a letter to White House political affairs director Karl Rove, the committee chairman, Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), asked about the Jan. 26 videoconference by Rove deputy J. Scott Jennings, which was directed to the chief of the GSA and as many as 40 agency officials stationed around the country.

Jennings's 28-page presentation included 2006 election results and listed the names of Democratic candidates considered beatable and Republican lawmakers thought to need help. At a hearing Wednesday about the GSA, Waxman said the presentation and follow-up remarks allegedly made by agency chief Lurita Alexis Doan may have violated the Hatch Act, a law that restricts federal agencies and employees from using their positions for political purposes.

In yesterday's letter, Waxman asked Rove who prepared the presentation and whether Rove or Jennings consulted with anyone about whether it might be in violation of the Hatch Act. Waxman also asked whether Rove or any members of his staff have given the same or similar PowerPoint presentations to political appointees at other government agencies.

Considering how much grief Rove has given Bush, why hasn't he just fired him? Well that is simple. Because if Bush fires Rove, the Bush looses his brain and his brain might even get pissed and decide to talk.

More White House Abuse Of Power?

Posted 10/30/06 at 4:47pm by jamie

One thing is for certain - Bush has used the federal government as a political pawn more than any other President. Here is even more proof of it:

During a whirlwind five-hour trip to bolster an endangered GOP congressman's reelection prospects, White House political guru Karl Rove last week delivered a fiery speech to 500 party activists, then shook every available hand and posed for snapshots like a rock star. He toured suburbs recently trashed by a snowstorm. He also found time to huddle with local strategists.

But the most significant element of Rove's effort to help four-term Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds keep his job may have occurred behind closed doors, when the White House strategist met with a federal disaster relief official contemplating how to respond to the storm. Four days later, Reynolds announced that President Bush would authorize millions of dollars in federal disaster aid for the area.

That is not the key part however. Further down in the article you get to the smoking gun:

Instead, Rove is giving a virtuoso performance designed to prevent the Democrats from taking control of the House and Senate or, if that is no longer possible, to hold down the size of the Democratic victory to make it easier for the GOP to come back in 2008. His plan is three-pronged: to reenergize any conservatives who may be flagging; to make sure the GOP's carefully constructed campaign apparatus is functioning at peak efficiency; and to put the resources of the federal government to use for political gain.

(emphasis mine).

A Bad Leak

Posted 4/16/06 at 1:47pm by jamie

The New York Times has an editorial today on the Scooter Libby leak and it deserves a very good read.

President Bush says he declassified portions of the prewar intelligence assessment on Iraq because he "wanted people to see the truth" about Iraq's weapons programs and to understand why he kept accusing Saddam Hussein of stockpiling weapons that turned out not to exist. This would be a noble sentiment if it actually bore any relationship to Mr. Bush's actions in this case, or his overall record.

Mr. Bush did not declassify the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq — in any accepted sense of that word — when he authorized I. Lewis Libby Jr., through Vice President Dick Cheney, to talk about it with reporters. He permitted a leak of cherry-picked portions of the report. The declassification came later.

And this president has never shown the slightest interest in disclosure, except when it suits his political purposes. He has run one of the most secretive administrations in American history, consistently withholding information and vital documents not just from the public, but also from Congress. Just the other day, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales told the House Judiciary Committee that the names of the lawyers who reviewed Mr. Bush's warrantless wiretapping program were a state secret.

Be sure to check out the rest of this article.

SPECTER: WH Needs To Come Clean On Leak

Posted 4/9/06 at 3:37pm by jamie

Arlen Specter was on FOX News this morning and had some interesting things to say regarding the leak case. The following is from Forbes:

President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney should speak publicly about their involvement in the CIA leak case so people can understand what happened, a leading Republican senator said Sunday.

"We ought to get to the bottom of it so it can be evaluated by the American people," said Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"There's been enough of a showing that the president of the United States owes a specific explanation to the American people ... about exactly what he did," Specter said.

[...]

"I think it is necessary for the president and vice president to tell the American people exactly what happened," Specter told "Fox News Sunday."

[...]

"There has to be a detailed explanation as to precisely what Vice President Cheney did, what the president said to him and an explanation by the president as to what he said," Specter said.

It is becoming more clear that Bush is afraid to come come clean on the leak because it was motivated purely for political purposes. The simple fact that they would only release things that supported the war while hiding the overwhelming amounts of information that showed the war was not necessary proves this.

The President can declassify information but why in the hell did he not just come out and say this? We have gone through a three year investigation and now Scooter Libby is even on trial because of Bush's lies and dirty politics.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter