primetime

Obama’s Missed Opportunity On Owning The Jobs Debate

Posted 9/1/11 at 8:25am by jamie

By now you have probably heard that the White House gave into John Boehner’s demands to move the date of Obama’s address to a joint session of Congress on jobs. Instead of the speech being next Wednesday, we will not have to wait until Thursday so that nothing interferes with the Republican debate next week.

This is another sign of the Obama administration being weak on politics and commanding the lead in any debate and there are a few reasons for this.

Eliot Spitzer To Co-Host New CNN Show With Kathleen Parker

Posted 6/23/10 at 12:22pm by jamie

Well this should be an interesting combination:

Former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and 2010 Pulitzer Prize winning columnist Kathleen Parker will co-host a new hour long CNN primetime news program starting in the fall as the nation prepares for the 2010 midterm election, the network announced Wednesday morning.

The yet-to-be-named “roundtable discussion” program will air at 8 p.m. ET replacing Campbell Brown.

CNN isn't hiding their intentions either:

“Other cable news channels force-feed viewers one narrow, predictable point of view; in contrast, CNN will be offering a lively roundup of all the best ideas – presented by two of the most intelligent and outspoken figures in the country,” Jon Klein, president of CNN/U.S., said in a statement released by the network. “Eliot and Kathleen are beholden to no vested interest – in fact, quite the opposite: they are renowned for taking on the most powerful targets and most important causes.”

Color me crazy, but this could just work out. People have been force to one side or the other at the 8pm hour. I'm one of those people who love hearing both sides, and this show should give us a chance at that.

I know I'll give it a chance.

There is one big question that remains. Now that MSNBC will have a new show on at the 10pm hour, hosted by Lawrence O'Donnell, will this new CNN show end up hurting Olbermann? As it is now people could watch the CNN show then catch Olbermann at 10. Once O'Donnell's show starts, then people would have to wait until 11pm to catch the Olbermann rerun, and that is local news time for a lot of people.

How Can Sarah Palin Stand Up To Terrorists When She Is Afraid Of Little Bloggers?

Posted 12/31/09 at 8:43am by jamie

When Sarah Palin had her final book signing in Alaska Todd Palin put out a list of people not allowed to attend. One of them was Shannyn Moore:

Sarah Palin's Wasilla book signing had a few rules. "Per Todd Palin", three of us were banned. "Public servants" in their police uniforms at a "public event" in a "public building" had a list of "public citizens" not allowed in. For what it's worth, I was an hour away, prepping for my television show. I wasn't even there! Nor did I have any plans to show up for someone signing a book she didn't write, that is chock-full of open and transparent lies!

Shannyn has even posted the documents here. So if Palin is so scared of bloggers, how can we expect her to respond to real threats like al Qaeda? Just another example of someone not being ready for primetime. 

WHY TERRORISM DID NOT BELONG ON THE G8 AGENDA

Posted 7/10/05 at 6:36pm by jamie

Ever since those horrid attacks on London’s busy streets
this past week, numerous people have strongly criticized the G8 summit for not
putting terrorism on their agenda. They feel it should have been the top
priority for the leaders of these eight nations.

Perhaps I can shed some light on why terrorism had no need
to be in the G8 summit.

We all know that the war in Iraq and the war on terrorism
have come under heavy scrutiny lately. We hear questioning and opposition of the
administrations plans everyday. These even prompted the President to address the
nation in a primetime speech a couple weeks ago. But while there is all this
criticism out there, the President and his administration strongly stand by
saying we are making excellent progress and the wars are going well. If the war
on terrorism and in Iraq is doing so good, then right wingers should have no
reason to cry because the G8 did not put it on their agenda. This would have
been counter productive and taken away from the more important issues of global
warming and poverty in Africa.

Poverty in Africa claims more lives every day than
terrorism has claimed. It is an epidemic that is growing at an alarming
proportion. The simple fact is if the leaders of the eight richest nations in
the world ignored this, they would be as guilty as the terrorists when it comes
to taking lives. The shear number of lives this poverty claims should be merit
enough to put it above terrorism on any agenda.

NEW RULE: Leave the Acting to Hollywood

Posted 6/30/05 at 1:38am by jamie

President Bush’s speech on Tuesday night was the kind of acting job you would
expect a back drop of porn music too. He acted out his reasons for the war in
Iraq which have changed time and time again. Shortly paused by one short round
of applause that was reported by two major news networks as being queued, then
ending with what was one of the fakest fighting back of tears I have ever seen.

Throughout the course of his 30 minute waste of primetime, the President
eluded to September 11 a total of five times. His acting job is hindering the
factual job. Americans already know that Iraq had no involvement with September
11, and the continual attempt to make such a connection just reminded us more of
how we have opened Iraq up to Al Qaeda. The President effectively increased the
size of the waste pile that I know call “bushit”.

This “catapulting of propaganda”, to quote our President, proceeded with the
continue assertion of the growing number of security forces in Iraq. This has
been an on going controversy and was addressed by Donald Rumsfeld last week when
he gave testimony to a Congressional oversight committee. Secretary Rumsfeld
made a strong point in clearing up the fact the Security forces are a composite
of many different facets of Iraq’s government. They compose of police, border
patrol, and military. The fact is Iraq is only sitting on approximately 30,000
military forces right now and we have said they will need ten times that before
we can even consider leaving.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter