public debate

House Fails To Override SCHIP Veto - UPDATED

Posted 10/18/07 at 1:18pm by jamie

Final vote was 273-156. The sick Republicans were cheering when the override failed. Glad to see they find illness and death involving children as something to cheer for.

44 Republicans voted with Democrats and two Democrats crossed over. The most upsetting part of this is it shows that the "House of Representatives" doesn't represent the people. Instead a majority of the minority party choose to Represent the worst President in American history. They do not deserve to be re-elected.

UPDATE:

Steve Benen makes a great point here:

Here’s the key number to keep in mind: last month 45 House Republicans voted for his bill. Today, that number dropped to 44.

In other words, after weeks of media scrutiny, public debate, constituent phone calls, right-wing smears of innocent families, and intense lobbying, the Republican Party ended up going backwards on providing healthcare for low-income kids.

I wonder how long until the wingnuts attack this person that changed sides?

Tucker Get A Smack Down

Posted 7/12/07 at 10:58am by jamie

This was classic. Scarborough thinks that Tucker got the best in this argument. Check it out and see what you think. I believe Scarborough is flat wrong.

It is funny to hear these right wingers get mad when the personal lives of politicians is brought into the public debate. It was just 10 years ago that it was perfectly legitimate to do so. As matter of fact, Joe was on the very Congress that voted to impeach Bill Clinton.

White House Won't Share Domestic Spying Documents

Posted 2/2/06 at 5:34am by jamie

Hmm does this really shock anyone? From this morning's

New York Times
:

The Bush administration is rebuffing requests from members of the Senate
Judiciary Committee for its classified legal opinions on President Bush's
domestic spying program, setting up a confrontation in advance of a hearing
scheduled for next week, administration and Congressional officials said
Wednesday.

The Justice Department is balking at the request so far, administration
officials said, arguing that the legal opinions would add little to the
public debate because the administration has already laid out its legal
defense at length in several public settings.

Article continues

here.

Well hopefully yesterday's events will help form what happens here. The White
House refused to turn over documents on the response to Katrina. Of course they
were claiming "executive privilege".

The GAO comes out
with a report faulting the White House and Homeland
Security for the response. Perhaps the same will come out of this. The White
House won't turn over documents and once again the White House will be proven in
the wrong. Of course it pisses me off to no end that the Republicans had no
problem at all issuing subpoenas about Clinton's blow job yet issues of our
constitution and our response to disasters they won't even consider that power.

Rove - Still A Case on this Blog!

Posted 7/20/05 at 3:16pm by jamie

Ok we now know who the Supreme Court nominee is. That means
it is time to shift focus back to the big scandal. I am of course talking about
Karl Rove.

The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that the State
Department memo which identified Plame seems to be one of the key pieces of
evidence in the grand jury inquiry. The memo was marked classified, and the line
where Plame was identified was even marked with “this information is not to be
shared”. That means Rove and Libby both should not have talked about it with
reporters.

I am kind of upset with certain people on the left with
regards to this issue. They think Judith Miller should not be in jail. I
disagree. If Judith Miller was protecting a “whistle blower” then I would be up
in arms over her jailing. The fact is, she is not protecting a “whistle blower”,
but instead she is in jail because she is protecting a possible criminal. Judge
Tatel, who is a federal appeals judge that ruled Cooper and Miller were to turn
over their notes, even said "were the leak at issue in this case less harmful to
national security or more vital to public debate.". He agrees that if this were
a whistle blower trying to uncover some wrong doing, then their sources could in
fact be protected.

If the defense had any merit at all, then they would not be
going on a witch hunt or smear campaign against Joe Wilson. They know that
people in the White House did something wrong. Instead of admitting fault, they
attack the victim. This is the same way as a rapist tries to defend himself by
saying “she asked for it”.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter