recent history

Want To Really See The Economy Crash? Just Listen To The Tea Party

Posted 8/9/11 at 9:04am by jamie

Yesterday's big sell off wasn't due to the recent down-grading of the U.S. credit rating. Sure it played a very minor part in it, but if you look at the markets yesterday there is something very interesting the sticks out. Investors still rushed to buy treasury bonds, which drove the 10 year interest rate below 2.4% yesterday. This is a huge rejection of the S&P downgrade, but why the big fall in the DOW and world markets?

While we live in scary times in terms of the economy, we are even more so in uncertain times. No one knows what the economy is going to look like tomorrow, in 6 months or even in five years. There are no plans coming out of Washington to turn our economy around and that has investors terrified. Paul Krugman sums up the current problem very nicely:

Truly, our public discourse has been entirely about problems we don’t have, at the expense of dealing with the problems we do have.

Instead of arguing over how to deal with our problems, both parties have decided this is the time to engage in ideological war. Neither party seems to have a common goal in sight and that is the real problem and the investors are seeing it.

So how can we make this problem a hundred times worse? Well let's ask Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX). During a town hall yesterday, Burgess entertained an idea that is sure to not help fix our economy:

When one attendee suggested that the House push for impeachment proceedings against President Barack Obama to obstruct the president from pushing his agenda, Burgess was receptive.

"It needs to happen, and I agree with you it would tie things up," Burgess said. "No question about that."

Islamaphobia Spreading To Our Children

Posted 9/1/10 at 11:27am by jamie

Sad, but not shocking:

A group of teenagers in western New York has been accused of harassing members of a mosque by yelling obscenities and insults during evening prayers for Ramadan, sideswiping a worshiper with a vehicle and firing a shotgun outside, the authorities said Tuesday.

The teenagers were cornered by members of the mosque, who held them for the police. They were charged with disrupting a religious service, a misdemeanor.

The obscenities episode occurred Monday and the shooting last Friday, both outside the World Sufi Foundation mosque in Carlton, N.Y., the authorities said. They said a 17-year-old fired the shotgun; no one was hit.

This is a smaller part of the bigger problem of opposing Park51 in that the hatred won’t be confined to that single location. It has been spreading like wildfire and won’t stop in the forseeable future.

What also amazes me is how Republicans are quick to define these incidents as some “group of outside troublemakers”. Are they that blind to our recent history to even realize that’s the same thing that happened on 9/11? For people that sure hate the terrorists, they are doing their best to try and mimic them.

More On That Gallup Poll

Posted 3/24/10 at 8:43am by jamie

I’ve been reading more on that Gallup poll from yesterday that shows more Americans now supporting health care reform than opposing it. For a refresher, here’s the results:

gphcr

What’s interesting is the headline accompanying this poll:

By Slim Margin, Americans Support Healthcare Bill's Passage

I don’t really remember pollsters considering a 9% margin “slim”. Perhaps all the talk of the “60% majority” of the Senate has confused the people at Gallup.

Then we have those on the right trying to spin this away. For example, here is Allahpundit:

And so it came to be, after a day’s worth of nonstop coverage of History!, that ObamaCare’s gotten a bounce.

What is really interesting here is when you look back at recent history. In the heat of last summer, during those viral townhall meetings, we saw support for health care reform plummet. There was 24/7 news coverage of the yelling and screaming, but if you ask anyone on the right that coverage had nothing to do with the wavering support. Sorry guys but you can’t have it both ways here.

Hey Boston Globe – There Is More Than One Liberal Blog Voice

Posted 1/17/10 at 7:41pm by jamie

In an article talking about Tuesday’s race, the Boston Globe decides to talk to one single “liberal blogger” to gauge the feel of the entire blogosphere:

Liberal blogs are loaded with complaints about Obama and demands that the president move to the left. During the campaign, “they energized enthusiasm among people who were really jazzed about voting for change. When you look at what happened, there’s not much change,’’ said Jane Hamsher, who pens a left-leaning blog, FireDogLake

Jane does not represent the progressive blogosphere as a whole. As matter of fact she don’t even represent a majority of it. Her representation of what the progressive blogosphere stands for has been reduced to a slither.

Sure some of us have been disappointed in what hasn’t been done this past year, but most of us are realistic. We know that Obama’s hands were tied by an unprecedented obstructionist minority party. It’s also only his first year in office and he had a lot more on his plate than any former President in recent history. But to use Jane as a voice for us while she is out trying to join forces with groups like the tea party is absurd.

Jane Hamsher and Firedoglake in no way represent this liberal’s views and I think a lot more bloggers are going to be echoing this exact sentiment very soon.

Barnes Says Kirk Can’t Vote After Tuesday

Posted 1/17/10 at 1:57pm by jamie

Fred Barnes, writing from his undisclosed la-la land location, is arguing that Paul Kirk won’t be able to vote after Tuesday. His argument:

But in the days after the election, it is Kirk’s status that matters, not Brown’s.  Massachusetts law says that an appointed senator remains in office “until election and qualification of the person duly elected to fill the vacancy.”  The vacancy occurred when Senator Edward Kennedy died in August.  Kirk was picked as interim senator by Governor Deval Patrick.

[SNIP]

But based on Massachusetts law, Senate precedent, and the U.S. Constitution, Republican attorneys said Kirk will no longer be a senator after election day, period.  Brown meets the age, citizenship, and residency requirements in the Constitution to qualify for the Senate.  “Qualification” does not require state “certification,” the lawyers said.

Certification doesn’t mean qualification – sure. What certification does mean is that the election is finalized, complete, done.

And what precedent? We just have to look at recent history for precedent. Rolland Burris was appointed to the Senate, but the Senate couldn’t seat him until he was “certified” by the state. The election isn’t over until that process is complete.

The only precedent I can think of would be in the recent Franken/Coleman circus. One thing the lawyers seem to be overlooking is the basis for which Coleman could not serve any longer. Those are laid out in article 1 section 3 of the U.S. Constitution:

Is Democratic Fundraising Taking A Hit?

Posted 9/25/09 at 10:35am by jamie

The Washington Post is reporting that it is:

Democratic political committees have seen a decline in their fundraising fortunes this year, a result of complacency among their rank-and-file donors and a de facto boycott by many of their wealthiest givers, who have been put off by the party's harsh rhetoric about big business.

The trend is a marked reversal from recent history, in which Democrats have erased the GOP's long-standing fundraising advantage. In the first six months of 2009, Democratic campaign committees' receipts have dropped compared with the same period two years earlier.

There very well could be some frustration by Democratic donors that they feel “left out” in Washington. We worked to bring our party back to power, only to see them bow to the very people we worked to defeat.

Speaking for a personal point, I used to be one to donate. I haven’t done that in awhile, and have no plans to. I feel like the Democrats are snubbing their noses at their base for one, but another big reason is the economic down turn. I don’t have that additional $25 or $50 laying around to give. That alone could be another reason for the downturn.

Overall I highly doubt that fundraising will be what it was a couple of years ago, but I also believe that the Democrats will have to work a lot harder to sell themselves to their donors and attempt to regain some trust that has been lost lately.

Do Republicans Want To Show Their Serious About Health Care?

Posted 9/9/09 at 9:21pm by jamie

If they do then tomorrow the Republican House leadership must denounce and censor Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina who decided to shout “you lie” to the President tonight.

STF

I can not remember something like this happening in recent history when a sitting president addressed a joint session of Congress. This guy has no shown he has no respect for our country and hopefully the voters of South Carolina will show his ass to the door next year.

Journalistic Malpractice

Posted 11/6/08 at 8:00am by jamie

This video has been making the rounds on the internet. Yes Sarah Palin makes George W. Bush look like a Rhodes Scholar. That is scary enough, but there is something much more telling in this video:

Carl Cameron says the he wishes he could have said this before the election, but it was all "put off the record". So Cameron decided to let this exposure of the person who could have been one 72 year old heartbeat away from President remain untold until after the election. This is journalistic malpractice and not the first time we have seen it. There has been another case in recent history which has cost this country the lives of almost 4,200 brave soldiers and nearly a trillion dollars. And the big news outlets wonder why they are losing out to the internet.

U.S. -VS- South Korea

Posted 6/22/06 at 2:28pm by jamie

First we get this story from 9:19 am this morning:

South Korea's defense minister said Thursday that Seoul believes North Korea's missile launch is not imminent despite concern in the region that the communist nation would test-fire a long-range missile.

 "It is our judgment that a launch is not imminent," Defense Minister Yoon Kwang-ung told a parliamentary meeting in comments confirmed by his ministry.

Worries over a possible North Korean launch have grown in recent weeks after reports of activity at the country's launch site on its northeastern coast where U.S. officials say a Taepodong-2 missile — believed capable of reaching parts of the United States — is possibly being fueled.

Then an hour later, this report comes out:

North Korea is far along in its preparations for a test of a long-range ballistic missile and the United States hopes the North Koreans will "give it up and not launch," a senior U.S. official said on Thursday.

White House national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters it remained uncertain if North Korea actually planned to conduct a test-firing of the missile, which Washington has warned would be seen as a provocative act.

"I think what we've said publicly is we're watching it very carefully and preparations are very far along. So you could, from a capability standpoint, have a launch. Now what they intend to do ... of course we don't know. What we hope they will do is give it up and not launch," he said.

The Republicans Continued "Fuck You" To America

Posted 6/5/06 at 11:31pm by jamie

Here are some interesting tidbits from this New York Times article:

All but one of the 44 Senate Democrats — Ben Nelson of Nebraska — have voiced opposition to the measure, as have some moderate Republicans, a result that would kill the measure for the year.

Remember this vote requires 2/3rds of the Senate to vote for it so now they got 56 of the needed 67 votes. Perhaps they are getting closer or perhaps:

Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, said that while he believed marriage should be between a man and a woman, he said he would vote against the amendment to ban gay marriage because the matter was already being addressed by the states. He quoted the late Sen. Barry Goldwater as saying that government "ought to be kept off our backs, out of our pocketbooks and out of our bedrooms."

"This is a matter which ought to be left to the states, and the states are taking care of it," he said. "It's a matter of privacy, it's a matter of tolerance, two very, very highly placed values in our society."

A Night With Paul Hackett

Posted 4/21/06 at 5:40pm by jamie

Me and Paul Hackett

(sorry about the bad picture - it was taken off a cell phone camera in the evening)

Last night we had our monthly Butler County Democrats Club meeting. We were joined by former congressional and senatorial candidate Paul Hackett.

Besides being a highly motivational speaker, Paul brought up some very good points for us to consider going into this election season. We are at a time where the fight to retake our government lies within our hands. We can not place the responsibility solely on the hands of state and national leaders. We are all in this together, not just for ourselves but also for our children and grandchildren.

Paul talked about how we are the party of a strong national defense and smaller government. That sounds like an old Republican talking point but times have changed. The Democrats are showing they have a better view of what our national security should be. The Democrats also don't believe our government should be listening in on our phone calls, talking to our doctors, worrying about what is happening in our bedroom. Sadly the current leadership of our country does not think the same way. This means that the Democrats are for smaller government.

This is the message we all need to convey to people we know who are sitting on the fence, or are even moderately conservative. I am not talking about going after the Tom Delays out there. I am talking about going after the older Regan Republicans. The Democrat beliefs align more with those people now than the Republican beliefs do.

More Sliding Of The Approval Rating

Posted 11/3/05 at 2:21am by jamie

Its the first of the month and we will start getting glimpses into how the
public thinks of our President. The first look is not so good for him.

CBS has released their latest poll that
goes into the leak investigation and the approval of the President. His approval
has dropped even more and more people now view the leak as serious.

HOW IMPORTANT TO THE NATION IS THE CIA LEAK MATTER?

  • Great Importance: 51%
  • Some Importance: 35%
  • Little/No Importance 12%

CBS also compared this to the views of other scandals that have surrounded
the White House in recent history. Here is a table comparing the results.

Churches Take To The Silver Screen This Weekend

Posted 10/23/05 at 6:31pm by jamie

It seems that the talk amongst the religious community is
the end of days. Current situations which have occurred in recent history are
used to promote the prophecy of the rapture.

Kirk Cameron and the
Trinity Broadcast Network (TBN) are no
exception to this frantic craze that is sweeping the country. This weekend, 3200
churches around the country (see
this article on
TBN's wire service site wdcmedia.com) on are set to turn their chapels into cinemas as they
debut the movie “Left Behind: World at War”, the third installment in a series
of movies staring Kirk Cameron which deal with the final judgment.

The movies are based on best selling books by the reverend 
Tim LaHaye and
Jerry Jenkins. Cameron plays television reporter “Buck” Williams who
now finds himself as a post-rapture leader in a group called Tribunal Force.
This third movie also brings into it one other big Hollywood name, Louis Gossett
Jr., who plays the President of the United States.

This is the first time a motion picture has debuted inside
of churches. In my small southwestern Ohio town, the screen is set at three
churches for this history making event.

This makes me want to question the motives of religious
leaders even more. While I am not a religious person, I have read both the Old
and New Testament cover to cover, along with the Quran. I find religion an
interesting subject and keep my mind opened to all religions that make up our
planet.

No Child Left Behind Gets Sued!

Posted 8/22/05 at 11:21pm by jamie

Connecticut has become the first state to challenge the No Child Left Behind
act in a court of law. The lawsuit claims that the act requires expensive
standardized tests without supplying funding for them.

This act, one of Bush's so called "milestones", is a total joke. It is worded
in such a way that any member of Congress who would of voted against it would
hear "they hate children" on their next round of campaigning. The act actually
does little to help all the schools. It gives funding to schools that already
have excellent funding and takes funding away from the poorer schools.

In a post September 11 world, states are facing more serious economic
crunches than they have in recent history. Their expenses continue to rise while
their income doesn't. No Child Left Behind actually adds to the crunch and
states now have to make cuts in areas such as education in order to fund other
items such as security.

While Connecticut is the first state to challenge the act in a court,
numerous others have opposed it. The Civil Society Institute found that 47
states are now opposing the act last week. The problem is somewhat of a
quagmire.

Schools are required to meet the minimum level on the standardized tests in
order to receive federal funding. If the school does not meet it then it will
lose that money. Now the school's with low funding have problems paying the
teachers to educate the students, let alone appropriate the needed materials to
educate. They have higher teacher to student rations and limited resources. This
makes it easier for the better funded schools to pass, thereby receiving the
funding. In other words; it lets the rich schools get richer while the poor
schools get poorer.

This is most likely  the beginning of numerous court actions against the
act.

A Look Into Recent History

Posted 8/2/05 at 2:35am by jamie

In 1998 Bill Clinton made an appointment to the United Nations. He appointed Richard Holbrooke to be the diplomatic voice of the United States. For 14 months the Republicans in Senate continued to block Holbrooke’s appointment in what became “partisan bickering”

Holbrooke was offered the recess appointment during this time, however he declined it. Holbrooke felt that going to the UN without the backing of our Senate would jeopardize his credibility and authority. He also did not like the message it would send to the other 160 nations represented by the UN.

Here we are a few short years later, and President Bush jumps on the chance to give John Bolton the recess appointment to the same seat. Even though plenty of testimony has been given to prove John Bolton is not a man to be our diplomatic voice, President Bush continued to blame it on partisan bickering. Sadly enough, Democrats aren’t the only ones who question Bolton’s qualifications for this job. Republicans like George Voinovich also have voiced concern.

We are at a time when we need to improve our standing in the world and the President of this country feels that will be best done with a bully sitting at the UN. He is sure to alienate us from the world even more with his yelling and lying, which is a proven tactic employed by Mr. Bolton. This does not bother the President. He continues to not only ignore members of Senate, but also the people of this country and force his appointees.

We must hope that the United Nations does not base their overall view of the United States on a rogue leader that we have sitting in the White House. This leader has done nothing for the people, but only focused his attention on business and war. I truly feel sorry for our next President as he/she will have one hell of a mess to clean up!

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter