rep mark foley

HASTERT: "Duhhhh I Don't Remember"

Posted 10/24/06 at 5:29pm by jamie

For wanting to be leaders, these idiots sure do have short term memory loss:

The House Republican campaign chairman, at odds with Speaker Dennis Hastert over when Hastert learned about ex-Rep. Mark Foley's come-ons to teenage male pages, was questioned Tuesday by an ethics panel.

Rep. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y., would not comment afterward on his repeated public assertions that he warned Hastert about Foley last spring. Hastert, R-Ill., says he first learned about Foley less than a month ago.

Hastert, expected to testify this week, has said he doesn't recall the conversation.

After his closed-door testimony, Reynolds said, "I would only add a full and fair investigation of the facts is vital to ensuring the continued integrity of this institution, which is why I strongly encourage any of my colleagues who have information that may be of relevance to bring it to the committee's attention at once."

(emphasis mine)

So you are the leader of the House of Representatives. You are told that a member of the House is pursuing sexual relations with the very children the House you run is charged with keeping safe. To make matters even worse, that member if from your own party. To really add insult to injury, this is coming up with a mid-term election a year away - one that your very power is dependent upon. You don't remember hearing about that? Dennis Hastert is a fucking moron, idiot and child predator enabler. If this is the level of competence the GOP wants from their leaders then they all need their asses kicked this fall. They also all need to be charged with complicity in Mark Foley's games. Hell Hastert probably wishes he was in on the action with Foley.

While Trying To Impeach Clinton - Foley Was On The Prowl

Posted 10/5/06 at 3:55pm by jamie

This shows you what the Republican controlled House is really all about:

An Atlanta man told a local television station and newspaper that former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley (news, bio, voting record) sent him sexually suggestive messages after he served as a congressional page 10 years ago.

Tyson Vivyan, 26, of Buckhead told WAGA-TV in a Wednesday interview that Foley began sending him instant messages about a month or two after his nine-month stint as a page ended in June 1997

Vivyan told the station that when he was a congressional page in 1996 and 1997 he barely spoke to Foley. But after he left the program - when he was 17 years old - Vivian says they had contact via e-mail about things he says where inappropriate.

"He somehow got ahold of my online identity on AOL and began sending me sexually illicit ims," Vivyan said in the TV interview.

Vivyan said he became upset when he learned that the messages were from Foley.

I wonder how Foley got this guy's AOL screen name? Sounds almost skalerish if you ask me. Oh but Clinton getting a blow job from an adult was more important.

Newt Speaks

Posted 10/5/06 at 1:34pm by jamie

And it is garbage:

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Wednesday that Democratic sex scandals have been far worse than the suggestive Internet messages sent to teenage congressional pages by former Rep. Mark Foley.

Gingrich said Democrats have wanted to punish their offenders less than the GOP.

"What we don't have to do is allow our friends on the left to lecture us on morality," Gingrich said at a party fundraiser in Greenville. "There's a certain stench of hypocrisy."

Which scandals are far worse? Clinton? At least Monica was over 18 and willing. She wasn't going "sick sick sick sick" about it.

Gerry Studds? It is amazing how the Republicans keep bringing up Studds and somehow suffer from Dan Crane amnesia. Remember, Crane was the Republican who was also busted during the scandal. The difference is Crane resigned and Studds didn't. Also the voters decided to return Studds to office. Isn't that democracy? They let the voters decide and not the politician's. Notice how it is Republicans calling for Hastert to resign? Sounds like the Republicans still don't trust the voters more.

How about Barney Franks? Yeah - because gay male prostitutes are so bad. Just ask Jeff Gannon who had free roam of the Bush White House, or ask Bush 41 about the late night parties involving male prostitutes, that occurred in the White House under his watch.

There's your hypocrisy Newt, but if that isn't enough there is always this.

Could These Items Be Connected?

Posted 10/3/06 at 9:51pm by jamie

Remember when this happened back in May?

An unusual FBI raid of a Democratic congressman's office over the weekend prompted complaints yesterday from leaders in both parties, who said the tactic was unduly aggressive and may have breached the constitutional separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government.

Rep. William J. Jefferson (La.), who is at the center of a 14-month investigation for allegedly accepting bribes for promoting business ventures in Africa, also held a news conference in which he denied any wrongdoing and denounced the raid on his office as an "outrageous intrusion." Jefferson, who has not been charged, vowed to seek reelection in November.

Which was immediately followed by this, which came as a shock to many:

House Speaker Dennis Hastert demanded Wednesday that the FBI surrender documents it seized and remove agents involved in the weekend raid of Rep. William Jefferson's office, under what lawmakers of both parties said were unconstitutional circumstances.

People wondered why Hastert was so outspoken on something that could have provided a blanket of safety on a key campaign issue - corruption. It put some of the corruption into the Democrats court, but Hastert didn't see it that way. He was worried about the raid. No one ever knew why. Why did Hastert go against not only his own party, but also the President?

Well today we find this out:

Can You See What's Missing?

Posted 10/1/06 at 4:31am by jamie

Think Progress is compiling a very nice timeline of the Foley incident. I want to bring to attention a certain date range so you can see if you notice what is missing:

2005 — Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) sends inappropriate emails to another former Congressional page. [CREW]

SEPTEMBER 2005 — Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-LA), who sponsored the page, learns “of the e-mails from a reporter.” [AP, 9/29/06; CQ, 9/30/06]

FALL 2005 — “Tim Kennedy, a staff assistant in the [Speaker J. Denis Hastert’s] Office, received a telephone call from Congressman Rodney Alexander’s Chief of Staff who indicated that he had an email exchange between Congressman Foley and a former House page…[Mike] Stokke [Deputy Chief of Staff for Speaker Hastert] called the Clerk and asked him to come to the Speaker’s Office so that he could put him together with Congressman Alexander’s Chief of Staff.” [Hastert Statement, 9/30/06]

Notice anything missing there (hint - a big name)? This same big name has been missing from all the reports of Foley in the last couple days.

Give up?

CREW Calls For Outside Investigation Into Foley Scandal

Posted 10/1/06 at 2:35am by jamie

WASHINGTON, Sept. 30 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) today called upon the House of Representatives to appoint an outside counsel to investigate the House leadership's role in covering up Rep. Mark Foley's (R-FL) inappropriate email exchanges with a sixteen-year-old former House page.

Several members of the Republican leadership have now admitted to knowing for nearly a year that Rep. Foley engaged in email exchanges with a sixteen-year-old former House page. These members, including Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and Reps. Rodney Alexander (R-LA), John Shimkus (R-IL) and Tom Reynolds (R-NY) have all claimed that they failed to take action because the boy's parents did not want to pursue the matter. The decision not to investigate further left other House pages unprotected and vulnerable to a potential sexual predator.

Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert's (R-IL) decision to have Rep. Shimkus review the page system is particularly ludicrous, given that it was Rep. Shimkus who, despite having been made aware that the boy and his parents were concerned about Rep. Foley's emails, readily accepted Rep. Foley's explanation that he was merely mentoring the boy. Rep. Shimkus is the chairman of the House page board.

Although the matter allegedly was raised before the House page board, the failure to insulate pages from further contact with Rep. Foley and the failure to implement measures to protect the pages suggests that the leadership failed to take the matter seriously.

Foley Resigns (updated)

Posted 9/29/06 at 7:25pm by jamie

A day after the scandal breaks of Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fl) sending questionable emails to a 16 year old boy, he turns in his resignation to Congress. This was considered a "safe seat" for the GOP this fall. Considering how quickly Foley resigned, there must be a lot more to this sick tale.

UPDATE:

Cnn just reported that sources have told them his decision was made because he feared more emails might surface. If there are other ones out there, they must be much worse than the ones already posted. Aravosis has a copy of all the emails.

UPDATE 2:

An interesting tidbit. In July of this year, it was Foley who introduced "sweeping" legislation against internet child pornogrpahy. This happens all to much. The people who appear to be trying and protect children, are in fact the ones who may be preying on them.

UPDATE 3:

Wow it does get worse. From ABC:

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter