republican victory

As I Was Saying About HCR Being Viewed As A Democratic Electorate Guarantee

Posted 12/23/09 at 9:04am by jamie

I hate playing the game of “i told ya so”, but it looks like that is what’s going to happen.

Last Friday I wrote a post in which I said:

I’m just spit-balling here, but something has struck me. For years we have talked about how banning abortion was a necessity for Republican victory, as backed up by the evidence of them actually not doing much to deliver once in office. The thought is that Republicans need to keep the abortion debate alive to insure they have voters come election day – the hard core anti-abortion base. If abortion was banned then this huge chunk of the base may not be willing to vote as much.

So that makes me wonder if health care reform could be viewed the same way for Democrats. Keep dangling that carrot in front of the face of electorates from one cycle to the next in hopes that they will turn out on that Tuesday morning in November.

And then yesterday this news comes out:

A new polling memo offers encouraging news to Democratic senators as they embark on a high-stakes effort to sell health reform to voters following this week’s historic votes.

In a strategy memo to be provided to Democratic senators on Tuesday, Mark Mellman, CEO of The Mellman Group, reports that public polls are giving a distorted picture of the level of opposition to health-care reform. That’s because in many of these polls, “opponents” include people who think the current proposals do not go far enough.

So the Mellman Group is selling the failure to get things like Medicare for 55+ and the lack of a public option as a win for Democrats when it comes voting time.

Could HCR Be Viewed As An Electorate Guarantee For Democrats?

Posted 12/18/09 at 3:18pm by jamie

I’m just spit-balling here, but something has struck me. For years we have talked about how banning abortion was a necessity for Republican victory, as backed up by the evidence of them actually not doing much to deliver once in office. The thought is that Republicans need to keep the abortion debate alive to insure they have voters come election day – the hard core anti-abortion base. If abortion was banned then this huge chunk of the base may not be willing to vote as much.

So that makes me wonder if health care reform could be viewed the same way for Democrats. Keep dangling that carrot in front of the face of electorates from one cycle to the next in hopes that they will turn out on that Tuesday morning in November.

Sure pass a half-assed measure now to throw us a very small bone and then in November promise us that you will deliver something more – like Medicare for 55+. Then in 2012 we get President Obama transforming back into canidadte Obama and he will be out there saying how he will work hard to expand health care to even more.

Yes it is a very sinister notion, but given the lack of a real fight from people like Reid and Obama it does make perfect sense. Politics come first – actually delivering on your agenda, well that is a distant second.

Defeat!

Posted 12/20/07 at 8:59am by jamie

The Huffington Post's front page this morning couldn't sum it up better:

huffPoFront

The top article from today's WaPo has a little gentler headline:

Key Setbacks Dim Luster of Democrats' Year

Having been a close follower of politics for over 25 years, I keep thinking back to 1995. Bill Clinton was in the White House and Newt Gingrich just orchestrated a massive takeover of Congress for the GOP. I have to give the Republicans credit on that, because they did fight for their campaign promises. They shut the government down to fight. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the rest of the Democratic leadership have shown absolutely no spine in fighting this White House, and that is an extreme disappointment.

Another Pelosi Sighting (But Still No Hastert Sightings)

Posted 11/6/06 at 3:49pm by jamie

SFGATE:

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi warned that a Republican victory Tuesday would prolong the U.S. involvement in Iraq another 10 years, as she embarked on a final push in a campaign that could make her speaker.

In an interview from her Capitol office, Pelosi characterized Tuesday's vote as a referendum on the war, shrugged off President Bush's efforts to make her liberalism a national issue, described the current GOP leadership as a "freak show," and expressed confidence about her party's prospects to pick up the 15 seats it needs for a majority.

"I know where the numbers are in these races, and I know that they are there for the 15; today (it's) 22 to 26," Pelosi said Friday.

Pelosi cautioned that the number of Democratic House victories could be higher or lower and said her greatest concern is over the integrity of the count -- from the reliability of electronic voting machines to her worries that Republicans will try to manipulate the outcome.

"That is the only variable in this," Pelosi said. "Will we have an honest count?''...read on

So while Pelosi is giving interviews, as well as campaigning, we still don't know where Hastert is. The Washington Post hasn't forgotten about our missing speaker:

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter