the right

The GOP's Lost White House Years

Posted 1/3/12 at 9:14am by jamie

A funny thing about this Republican primary season is that you never hear the past President mentioned. The GOP field seems to steer clear of George W. Bush as though he was some married gay couple. What's this say about the GOP's track record of picking presidential candidates?

It goes beyond that. In the past 32 years we have had 20 years of a Republican president and 12 of a Democratic one. Democrats have no problem mentioning Bill Clinton, yet Republicans ever only want to mention the first eight years of their 20, which would be Ronald Reagan and when they do that they only seem to remember the second term of Ronald Reagan, ignoring the first when the Gipper did things like raise taxes. So out of 20 years of occupying the White House, the right only wants to remember 20% of their years.

This really comes as no shock. Since President Obama assumed office the right has been on a covert mission to wipe the collective American memory banks of the Dubya presidency. President Bush oversaw the largest economic collapse since the Great Depression, yet the right continues to try and insist that it was all President Obama's doing. We have even seen one Republican candidate, Michele Bachmann, go as far as to try and make us believe that Barack Obama was President in 2003 and ordered the invasion of Iraq.

Bare Naked Islams Short Reprieve And Exposure Of Right Wing Hypocrisy

Posted 1/2/12 at 11:32am by jamie

On Friday I posted about Islam hate site "Bare Naked Islam" being taken offline by their hosting company Wordpress. CAIR had put out a press release, complete with links, showing that the site has a history of promoting violence towards Islam. Well Wordpress has allowed the site to go back up, but told them they must be moved off the service by January 6.

Let me set the record straight here before going into a couple of the comments I have noticed. Wordpress.com is a FREE service (though they also offer commercial services) provided by a PRIVATE U.S. company. We constantly hear the right talk about how bad big government is always trying to get in the way of business, so this first comment really has me scratching their head:

I have seen a lot of wingnuts saying this shouldn't be legal and is violating freedom of speech. For it to be legal and the government to have the authority to prevent it, would mean more regulation and government intervention into law. That's why this second comment has me scratching my head even more:

The Headless Party

Posted 12/21/11 at 12:00pm by jamie

Something that really deserves more attention is the lack of any powerhouses within the GOP. We saw this in 2008, when Republicans had to suck it up and vote for John McCain. We are seeing it again now with the right trying to figure out which Republican candidate is the lesser of two evils.

Are the people supporting Mitt really supporting him or are they more so going against Newt?

Is Newt's support coming from people who actually believe in Newt, or is coming from people voting against Mitt Romney?

How about Ron Paul? His sudden surge has left a lot of pundits scratching their heads. A man who wants to legalize drugs and prostitution, something so far from the social conservative base that it might as well be in Amsterdam, has become a serious contender in the GOP race.

What's fueling that sudden Ron Paul surge? Is it people supporting Ron Paul or is it people so fed up with the other choices that they have no other option?

In all these questions both options can ring true, but looking at polling data and reading commentary you quickly realize that it's not really support driving these candidates, but rather a lack of any real choice.

One of the problems facing today's GOP is that they have gone so far to the right that they have actually forgotten who they are or in what country they are living. They believe that America is a far right country, when in fact it is moderate, if not more on the left. I come to that conclusion from recently spending a few hours digging through tons of polls on social issues. When you look at things like gay marriage, taxing the rich, a woman's right to choose, the death penalty, social programs, gun control and about any other issue you can think of, America takes a more leftist view.

Chuck Todd Flips The Bird On National Television, Triggering The Apocalypse

Posted 12/14/11 at 9:57am by jamie

Here comes today's outrage from the right wingers. During a lead in, in which Chuck Todd thought the cameras were off, he get's caught flipping that notorious middle finger.

This was captured by the wingnut site NewsBusters and has this added commentary:

Will there be repercussions for Todd? Stay tuned.

Even on the YouTube NewsBusters posted you have a bunch of wingnuts calling for Todd to be fired and now Fox has picked up on it.

But certainly a Republican would NEVER do something like this - would they?

OOPS! I guess they would! But certainly that was just an off day and Bush would NEVER do that again - right?

Well damn, would you look at that! And yet when these incidents happened the right didn't go into defending Bush. You know why? BECAUSE NO ONE CARED!!!

I just love how these people can't find anything real to be outraged over so they have to go into the manufactured outrage over things that mean nothing.

Big Government Fears At Near Record Levels

Posted 12/13/11 at 8:16am by jamie

Gallup has a new poll out showing Americans fear big government more than anything else. Here's the results:

Needless to say this poll is making its rounds on the right, but I would like to see a further breakdown of this poll, asking what fears.

It's no secret that many people don't know what laws and policies are passed until it affects them. Take the TSA body scanners. Most people believe that this is something instituted by President Obama. Little do they know this was a policy pushed through by the Bush Administration and former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who profited big time from the plan.

Or how about recent news of drones being used for law enforcement here in the U.S.? Again, this was something pushed through under the Bush administration, but also continued by the Obama administration.

Does The GOP Really Care About State Sovereignty?

Posted 11/25/11 at 1:29pm by jamie

My last post really got me thinking. The right constantly invokes "state sovereignty" when complaining about the "over-reach" of the federal government, yet their own actions prove that the right actually cares nothing about this issue.

Let's look at some of the recent issues in the news. My previous post was about the GOP telling states that they have no sovereignty when it comes to the issue of concealed weapons, but what about something like abortion? Well that's another issue that the right feels states should have no rights on.

A couple of weeks ago Herman Cain said that he was pro-life, but he felt that it should be left up to the individual states to decide. Honestly this is a true Republican position, but we don't have a true Republican party anymore. Now we have a Republican Party full of right wing zealots that want to transform America into something Ronald Reagan would fight.

When Cain decided to say that the state's should have the choice, the pro-lifers went into battle mode. They quickly attacked Herman Cain and eventually caused him to flip-flop on the issue. Now Cain believes the government should "over reach" and force states to forgo their sovereignty and do what the federal government says. A Republican view? No way!

The Right Only Has Themselves To Blame For The Cain Story

Posted 11/4/11 at 7:18pm by jamie

Throughout this entire week many on the right has been accusing liberals, the media and even other GOP candidates for the Herman Cain sexual harassment story. In those defenses we have also heard things like “what about Bill Clinton”? Well what about him? They bring up a very interesting point.

Bill Clinton’s road to impeachment started with investigations into claims of sexual harassment, in the name of Paula Jones. Yes that is what really got the whole thing going in Congress and there hasn’t been no legal action brought against Cain, but what if he did when election and one of these accusers decided to take the case to court? We would end up with the makings of one of our darkest points in presidential history, but would the right allow investigations go on into Herman Cain if that happened? The laws of double standards from the right dictate not.

The entire point here is that the media is out there doing their job of vetting someone who could be our next President. Since the beginning of this country the media has been our only real vetting process for candidates. They have the tools and resources to find out who we might be electing to be our next leader and they did just that on Herman Cain. Sexual harassment has become a new part of that vetting process and that is because of Bill Clinton. It was the right’s continuous obsession with Bill Clinton’s sex life that made what we see today the norm.

Just think of this when you try to dismiss the story of Herman Cain, Bill Clinton’s problems started with claims of sexual harassment by a former employee. If Herman Cain does become President, is the right ready to relive the 90s when it’s their own party on trial? I highly doubt it.

Oh Yes He Did! Herman Cain Plays The Race Card

Posted 11/1/11 at 10:46pm by jamie

Well that didn’t take long:

On FOX News' "Special Report" tonight presidential candidate Herman Cain told the panel, after being asked, that he believes the charge of sexual harassment against him has to do with his race.

Charles Krauthammer: "Mr. Cain, when Clarence Thomas was near to achieving position of high authority, he was hit with a sexual harassment charge. You contending for presidency, the office of highest authority, leading in the polls for the Republican nomination, all of the sudden get hit with a sexual harassment charge. Do you think that race, being a strong black conservative, has anything to do with the fact you've been so charged? And if so, do you have any evidence to support that?"

Herman Cain: "I believe the answer is yes, but we do not have any evidence to support it. But because I am an unconventional candidate running an unconventional campaign and achieving some unexpected unconventional results in terms of my -- the poll. We believe that yes, there are some people who are Democrats, liberals who do not want to see me win the nomination. And there could be some people on the right who don't want to see me -- because I'm not the

'establishment candidate.' No evidence."

"Relative to the left, I believe that race is a bigger driving factor. I don't think it's a driving factor on the right. This is just based upon our speculation," Mr. Cain also said.

Rick Santorum Wants Herman Cain To Be More Forthcoming On Sexual Harassment Allegations

Posted 11/1/11 at 2:27pm by jamie

Since news erupted Sunday night of past sexual harassment allegations against GOP front runner Herman Cain we have heard the same old meme from the right – “it’s the liberal media”. Given how this is a constant defense for the right, despite one of the primary authors of the article being a former reporter for one of the best known conservative publications, it makes it even more interesting that Rick Santorum is now embracing the Politico article:

Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum’s presidential campaign is calling on Herman Cain to offer a more detailed explanation of the sexual harassment allegations made against him during his time as the head of the National Restaurant Association.

“What I would encourage the Cain campaign to do is, if you are the frontrunner and you plan to be the nominee, to be forthcoming so that you are vetted, and we don’t get into a situation where you’re our nominee and we find out things after the fact,” said Santorum strategist John Brabender, speaking at an election preview forum hosted by National Journal.

Santorum’s campaign is the first of Cain’s opponents to jump on the allegations that have been lodged against him. Politico reported late Sunday that two women reached settlements with the NRA in the 1990s after accusing Cain of sexual harassment.

Republicans Against Republican Policies

Posted 10/11/11 at 8:26pm by jamie

I have been tied up the last several days helping my sister get her new house ready so I am a little behind the news. Today I find out the wingnuts have decided to launch their own response to Occupy Wall Street, a movement called the 53%. These are Republicans against the 47% of Americans that make too little to actually have to pay income tax. Today Steve Benen brought up the most interesting point about this group:

There are all kinds of problems with the right’s approach here, including the fact that they seem to want to increase working-class taxes and also seem entirely unaware of the fact that it was Republican tax cuts that pushed so many out of income-tax eligibility in the first place.

In a rapidly growing "movement" on the right we now see Republicans going against their own policies and beliefs. First off they want to raise taxes in the middle of a recession, but only on those that will stimulate demand. We already know that Republicans fail big time in basic economics. They have no comprehension that increased demand means a need for more supply. When you need more supply you need people to make that product and that boils down to hiring. Nope, Republicans believe that if business owners have more money they will just hire and put out product regardless if they are moving inventory or not.

But the biggest thing Benen points out is that the right is now against the Bush tax cuts. That's exactly what created the 47%. So why is the right now so against the tax cuts they championed just months ago? It sounds like another case of partisanship before country or even logic if you ask me. It also sounds like the minions of the right are following the cult leaders out there. Drink thy Kool Aid little tools and don't whine if you win and your taxes go up - that's what you are now fighting for!

Americans Want A New Government

Posted 9/26/11 at 9:03am by jamie

If you ask Democrats the Republicans controlling the House are the problem. If you ask Republicans the problem lies in Senate and and the White House. None of that should really matter though. The problem is that our government is broken and Americans are fed up with it according to a new Gallup poll that shows a record 82%

This poll could also show that the Republican plan is working. 69% now say they have little or no confidence in the legislative branch. while 57% say they have little or no faith in the government to solve domestic problems. Those statistics fit right into the "small/no government" beliefs of the GOP, but it get's even worse with 49% now believing that the government poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of citizens. Now while I said this was the affect of the GOP plan, I don't mean it's good news for the GOP.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter