rudy giuliani

Would Rudy Pardon Kerick?

Posted 11/9/07 at 9:40am by jamie

He won't say:

Rudy Giuliani refused to say if he'd consider pardoning his old friend Bernie Kerik - who was indicted Thursday on federal corruption charges - if elected President.

"It wouldn't be fair to ask that question at this point," the Republican presidential hopeful said in an exclusive interview in Dubuque, Iowa, just hours before Kerik was indicted in New York.

Like any other Republican, Rudy hates the law. Of course that is only when it affects him or the people around him.

The irony is that yesterday a poll came out saying 74% of the people want a President different than Bush. Well that should translate to 74% of the people don't want Rudy. Here is the voting points for Rudy:

  • Want more cronyism in our federal agencies? Vote Rudy.
  • Want more wars by a leader who won't listen to experts? Vote Rudy.
  • Want more disregard for the law? Vote Rudy.

That's just a few off the top of my head, but Rudy looks more and more like Bush everyday. Hell he is already bringing in a lot of the most notorious names of the Bush administration. I wouldn't be shocked if Rudy picked Cheney as his running mate. He already said he wants a VP like Cheney.

Rudy is Bush. There is no getting around it, so if you think this county is doing great and on the right track, go out there and give Rudy your vote. I sincerely hope America isn't so ignorant to not see through him. If we are then we deserve what ever happens to us. Hell we might as well start learning Chinese.

The GOP Fracture

Posted 10/1/07 at 12:11pm by jamie

Rudy Giuliani is a problem for the GOP. The right-wing pundits try to dismiss this, but the Christian Right is making sure their concerns are known:

Alarmed at the chance that the Republican party might pick Rudolph Giuliani as its presidential nominee despite his support for abortion rights, a coalition of influential Christian conservatives is threatening to back a third-party candidate in an attempt to stop him.

The group making the threat, which came together Saturday in Salt Lake City during a break-away gathering during a meeting of the secretive Council for National Policy, includes Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family, who is perhaps the most influential of the group, as well as Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, the direct mail pioneer Richard Viguerie and dozens of other politically-oriented conservative Christians, participants said. Almost everyone present expressed support for a written resolution that “if the Republican Party nominates a pro-abortion candidate we will consider running a third party candidate.”

I have always said this country needs more political parties. We have grown too diverse for all our political beliefs to be summed up into two parties. This could become the opening for such a division. Personally I would like to see both parties split into two. Our democracy really needs this.

Since The Senate Is About Condemning Now

Posted 9/21/07 at 10:10am by jamie

Will they do the same for Republican Congressman and Giuliani adviser Peter King?

A homeland security adviser to Rudy Giuliani came under fire Thursday for claiming there were "too many mosques" in the United States — and defended himself by saying his point was that not enough Muslim leaders cooperate with law enforcement.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., the former chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee and the top GOP member on the panel, said his comments to the Politico Web site were taken out of context. Democrats said Giuliani should drop him as a campaign adviser.

"I stand by everything I said other than the fact that the Politico totally took it out of context," King said Thursday.

So a member of the United States Congress insults an entire group of our population based upon religion. The Senate should take up a resolution immediately to condemn this statement since they have this new precedent now. Or is it that Petraeus is such a thin skinned individual that he is the only one who deserves such pampering?

On Petraeus

Posted 9/12/07 at 10:21am by jamie

There was a lot of attention give to General Petraeus saying he didn't know if Iraq was making us safer. For those that missed it, here it the clip from yesterday's Senate hearing:

This was a very damming answer and could be detrimental to the warring morale of our troops. For their commander to say he "doesn't know" if their sacrifice is making their country safer speaks volumes. His explanation of not thinking about that is also very poor. I doubt there is a person in this country who hasn't asked themselves that very question. It amounts to our very purpose of being there. It also is one of George Bush's key reasons of the war. How many times do we hear Bush or other supporters saying "If we leave Iraq today they will follow us home".

Even more profound is the day that this horrible statement was made on. Yesterday was the 6th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. For 4 1/2 years since those attacks, our nation's military has been focused on a war, in a nation, that has nothing to do with the attacks - and for what? The people who killed almost 3,000 of our citizens is still on the run and this idiot is sitting before Congress saying that the last 4 1/2 years has not made us safer?

Petraeus did not only betray us with this comment, he betrayed the soldiers, who are sacrificing tirelessly for this war.

Speaking of betrayal and Petraeus, there has also been a lot of talk about the Move On ad. Republicans are out there quickly yelling that Democrats should denounce Move On. Here we go again with the morbid hypocrisy that is constantly exhibited on the right. Again on the anniversary of 9/11, Ann Coulter was speaking in the "Freedom tour", with people like Rudy Giuliani. This is a person who said the widows of 9/11 cherish their husbands death. What hasn't the GOP denounced those statements? I guess they believe the same thing Coulter says. After all - that is what their own rules dictate in this.

Missing From The Sunday Talk Shows

Posted 7/30/07 at 8:57am by jamie

There was a lot of discussion about the CNN/YouTube Democratic debate on the talk shows yesterday, but there was no mention of the stalled Republican debate? Why don't the Sunday talking heads want people to know the Republicans are to chicken to take questions from the people? They sure talked it up when the Democrats refused to debate on Fox, the media arm of the Bush administration, but I guess it is ok that the Republicans won't take question from the very people they want to serve.

I ask again - if people like Rudy Giuliani or Mitt Romney can't face the American people then how can they face the terrorists? These are cowards through and through.

Giuliani Praises Bush

Posted 5/6/07 at 8:49am by jamie

Well - he sure didn't do it during the debate. Hell he didn't even mention Bush's name:

Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani said in Iowa on Friday that President Bush's response to terrorism will ensure his legacy is that of "a great president."

"He will be, I believe, a president who will be viewed by history for this one decision as being a great president," the former New York mayor told about 100 Cedar Rapids-area Republicans during a quick campaign stop in eastern Iowa. "He decided in a flash to put our country on offense against terrorism."

Now let's get this straight. Failing to catch the man behind one of the deadliest attacks in our nation's history is great.

  • Having the number of terrorism attacks since 9/11 increase worldwide is great.
  • Having an administration lie this nation into a war with another country that had nothing to do with the attacks on us is great.
  • Destroying the rights of every American, along with Habeas Corpus is great.
  • Allowing the al Qaeda to resurface because Bush decided to go after Saddam instead is great.
  • 3,362 soldiers dying because of a war of lies is great.
  • Allowing our military to reach its weakest point in modern history is great.

I am sure there are a lot of other "great" things I have missed. If this is what Giuliani gauges greatness on then I would hate to see what he considers a failure.

This should pretty much end the debate about Giuliani. Put him in the White House and all we will get is Bush 3.0. If he thinks Bush is so great then he won't change anything in the execution of the "war on terror" or Iraq. Just what America needs - more of the same failed policies.

Now Attacking Wives Is Bad

Posted 4/3/07 at 8:55am by jamie

Rudy is upset that people are talking about his current wife and wants the media to back off:

Several candidates for president are on a fast pace for fundraising. Democrat Hillary Clinton has set a record and Republican Rudy Giuliani isn't far behind.
But it's what Giuliani said Monday that will likely steal the headlines.

The former New York City mayor is fending off increased media scrutiny of his third wife -- the former Judith Nathan. Rudy is now asking the media to back off.

"Attack me all you want," Giuliani said. "There's plenty to attack me about. Please do it. But maybe, you know, show a little decency."

That's a tough sell for a man who suggested he might invite his wife into cabinet meetings.

How much was Hillary attacked while Bill was President? How about the right-wing darling, Rush Limbugh, saying that the Edwards are exploiting Elizabeth's cancer for political gain?

My advice to Rudy - if you can't handle what is happening now then drop out. You do not have thick enough skin to handle a run for the White House. I already know you do not have the leadership skills to be in the White House, but you are now starting to sound like a whiny little kid.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter