saddam hussein

Mission Accomplished - NOT

Posted 5/1/06 at 3:22pm by jamie

Three years after Bush declared "Mission Accomplished" in Iraq, the American people have a different perception:

Three years after President Bush declared major combat over in Iraq, Americans have strong doubts that the United States will fulfill the promise of his "Mission Accomplished" backdrop, a poll released Monday found.

The CNN poll, conducted April 21-23 by Opinion Research Corporation, found that only 9 percent thought the U.S. mission in Iraq had been accomplished, while 40 percent believed it would be complete someday.

An additional 44 percent said the United States would never accomplish its goals in Iraq, where American troops are still battling insurgents three years after the invasion that toppled former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

So only 9% of the people feel Bush told the truth on that highly expensive political stunt of flying onto an aircraft carrier. Glad he was so willing to quickly help spend our over abundance of money we have in this nation.

More Deadly Lies

Posted 4/12/06 at 1:43pm by jamie

July 30, 2003 - In a Rose Garden press conference, the President answered the following:

Q Mr. President, you often speak about the need for accountability in many areas. I wonder then, why is Dr. Condoleezza Rice not being held accountable for the statement that your own White House has acknowledged was a mistake in your State of the Union address regarding Iraq's attempts to purchase uranium? And also, do you take personal responsibility for that inaccuracy?

THE PRESIDENT: I take personal responsibility for everything I say, of course. Absolutely. I also take responsibility for making decisions on war and peace. And I analyzed a thorough body of intelligence -- good, solid, sound intelligence -- that led me to come to the conclusion that it was necessary to remove Saddam Hussein from power.

We gave the world a chance to do it. We had -- remember there's -- again, I don't want to get repetitive here, but it's important to remind everybody that there was 12 resolutions that came out of the United Nations because others recognized the threat of Saddam Hussein. Twelve times the United Nations Security Council passed resolutions in recognition of the threat that he posed. And the difference was, is that some were not willing to act on those resolutions. We were -- along with a lot of other countries -- because he posed a threat.

Dr. Condoleezza Rice is an honest, fabulous person. And America is lucky to have her service. Period.

 We now know that within that same time frame, the President also "declassified" parts of the National Intelligence Estimate, specifically the part which identified Valerie Plame. Of course that same part which identified Plame dealt with the Niger yellow cake claim.

Now one can only wonder what changed within those few days. First it was important to prove their case for war by releasing parts of the NIE which also resulted in the outing of a CIA agent whose area of expertise was on WMD, only for the President to accept responsibility for everything in that report to be wrong (with the exception of Joe Wilson being married to a CIA agent - Valerie Plame).

Now let's move forward to today, where we find this out-

"Thousands Of Mistakes"

Posted 3/31/06 at 4:38pm by jamie

Well it looks like the White House is trying everything to get out of the slump including this little gem:

BLACKBURN, England (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accepted on Friday the United States had probably made thousands of errors in Iraq but defended the overall strategy of removing Saddam Hussein.

Local Muslims and anti-war activists told Rice to "Go Home" when British counterpart Jack Straw earlier led her on a tour of his home town of Blackburn in the industrial northwest, an area which rarely plays host to overseas politicians.

"Yes, I know we have made tactical errors, thousands of them," she said in answer to a question over whether lessons had been learned since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Sure there are mistakes. Of course what does it really do to the fatcats in Washington. The people who pay for those mistakes are the soldiers, their families and the citizens of Iraq. That is something that the White House has a problem recognizing.

It has taken them three years to even admit mistakes, will it be another three to repair them? I would have to say so since that is when we will have someone new in the White House - someone who is hopefully competent.

Three Years Of Hell

Posted 3/19/06 at 1:53pm by jamie

Three years ago tomorrow night was when our news channels filled with images of bombs exploding in Baghdad. 9:34pm est. time will mark the anniversary of the actual start of the invasion.

So where have we gone since then? Well we did make it to Baghdad with little effort. We did find Saddam Hussein. That’s about it for the good points..

Now here we sit 3 years later and where are we. We have lost 2,318 soldiers, over 30,000 Iraqi citizens; spent over half a trillion dollars (increasing by $200 million a day) and we sit here, isolated from the rest of the world. What does our President have to say about the war now?

"More fighting and sacrifice will be required," Bush said in his weekly radio address. "For some, the temptation to retreat and abandon our commitments is strong. Yet there is no peace, there's no honor and there's no security in retreat. So America will not abandon Iraq to the terrorists who want to attack us again."

Basically the Bush plan for Iraq is the same it has been since the invasion. Think of it as football. We see upsets time and time again. A team takes to the field with an over optimistic attitude because their opponents rated a large underdog. Of course that over optimistic team comes home with their heads held down low because they were just upset. I am not saying our outcome in Iraq will be the same because we can change the rules. We can redefine what we call a win. True in war, the only winner is war.

Disgusting, Horrible, Shameful

Posted 3/15/06 at 6:49pm by jamie

Those were the first words that came to my mind when I was looking through the released Abu Ghraib photos on Salon's site. To see how we are treating these people while sitting there and trying to claim "we are the beacon of freedom" is pure bull shit. Every single person involved from civilian leadership all the way down the line should be severely prosecuted. They have taken everything they claim to "defend" along with everything this country has worked to become over the past 200 years and totally shredded it.

Even more, I feel Salon should be required viewing for every right wing Bush supporter out there. The people who claim we are "doing the right thing" needs to spend time looking at these photos. Every right wing, human rights bashing website should have their domain names changed to go to the site so they have to see what we have done. Amazing that these same people are the ones who consider abortion "a cruel murder". Well what in the hell do they call this - some radical right Sunday fun?

Remember - none of these people are "convicted" criminals. They are just held on suspicion. Even if they were convicted criminals, this kind of abuse is still way out of line.

Another Cincinnati Liberal

Posted 3/13/06 at 9:06pm by jamie

From George Clooney:

I am a liberal. And I make no apologies for it. Hell, I'm proud of it.

Too many people run away from the label. They whisper it like you'd whisper "I'm a Nazi." Like it's dirty word. But turn away from saying "I'm a liberal" and it's like you're turning away from saying that blacks should be allowed to sit in the front of the bus, that women should be able to vote and get paid the same as a man, that McCarthy was wrong, that Vietnam was a mistake. And that Saddam Hussein had no ties to al-Qaeda and had nothing to do with 9/11.

Read the rest of his great revelation at Huffington Post.

Being a life long resident of Cincinnati, reading this has made me so happy. This area is a typically Republican area but we have some great voices on the left that come from here. Jerry Springer, Woody Harrelson and now George Clooney are all great assets to this area. Before long maybe we can make this sleepy river town into a liberal haven. Now that I would love.

Notorious Iraq prison to close

Posted 3/9/06 at 6:20pm by Anonymous (not verified)

Source: Yahoo News

The notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq is to close and its prisoners housed elsewhere, according to US military sources.

The US military are expected to close Abu Ghraib prison within three months.

They plan to transfer some 4,500 prisoners to other jails in Iraq, a military spokesman said.

The prison in western Baghdad was a torture centre under Saddam Hussein before photographs of American soldiers abusing Iraqis there in 2003 gave it a new notoriety.

More About Iraq's Destabilization

Posted 2/23/06 at 10:10pm by jamie

Well considering the this mornings news of the US denying reports of Iraq nearing civil war, here is something else to offer a little contradicition:

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said insurgents are trying ``everything'' to foment civil war as reprisal attacks followed yesterday's bombing of the Golden Mosque in Samarra, sacred to Shiite Muslims.

``Anti-democratic forces have tried everything to push the country into a civil war and sectarian violence,'' Zebari said today in a phone interview from Baghdad, blaming the attack on extremists and supporters of ousted dictator Saddam Hussein. ``This is the biggest challenge we as Iraqis face, and efforts are under way to prevent it.''

After the Samarra blast destroyed the shrine's golden dome, about 30 Sunni Muslim mosques were attacked, and at least three Mullahs, or religious leaders, were killed, Zebari said. Eighty bullet-ridden corpses have been taken to a Baghdad morgue since yesterday afternoon, Agence France-Presse reported.

Article continues here

Yup. It might not be exactly there yet but damn, it sure is getting close. The worst part is once it happens, our troops are stuck right in the middle and will most likely fall victim to even more attacks. Murtha's plan sounds a lot better now - doesn't it?

Traitor's In The White House

Posted 2/9/06 at 6:32pm by jamie

So now the Vice-President has the authority to just leak out classified
information at a time of war?

Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis (Scooter)
Libby, testified to a federal grand jury that he had been "authorized" by
Cheney and other White House "superiors" in the summer of 2003 to disclose
classified information to journalists to defend the Bush administration's
use of prewar intelligence in making the case to go to war with Iraq,
according to attorneys familiar with the matter, and to court records.

Libby specifically claimed that in one instance he had been authorized to
divulge portions of a then-still highly classified National Intelligence
Estimate regarding Saddam Hussein's purported efforts to develop nuclear
weapons, according to correspondence recently filed in federal court by
special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

Article continues

here
.

This is really ridiculous and also treasonous. Congress must act on this and
hold hearings to clarify all the issues and if it is proven true, Cheney and the
others involved should be tried for their crimes and removed from office.

The Insurgency Still Growing

Posted 12/2/05 at 4:24pm by jamie

Here is an interesting article that doesn't paint the pretty picture in Iraq
that the administration would want us to believe.

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Despite US claims of progress in quelling the
insurgency in Iraq, it remains as robust as ever and could grow a good deal
stronger, according to a new study.

The study by two veteran defense analysts working for the Washington
Institute for Near East Policy also said the US operation in Iraq was at a
"tipping point" that will last for six to nine months.

"I think the outcome of this tipping period is probably going to dictate
whether or not the US effort in Iraq succeeds or fails," analyst Jeffrey
White said at a lunch unveiling the report.

The study said the insurgency, comprised of nationalists, members of
Saddam Hussein's toppled regime and foreign Islamic fighters, showed no sign
of losing steam 32 months after the US-led invasion.

"Although thousands of insurgents have been killed and tens of thousands
of Iraqis have been detained ... incident and casualty data reinforce the
impression that the insurgency is as robust and lethal as ever," it said.

The following graph represents the growing number of fatalities we experience
per month. While we had some months with higher fatality levels in 2004, over
all the monthly rate of fatality is increasing.

Data courtesy of ICASUALTIES.ORG

The report goes on to further detail more serious problems we could
experience in Iraq if the insurgency continues to grow.

Moreover, the researchers said, the insurgency has managed to exploit
only a fraction of the disgruntled minority Sunni Muslim population with any
kind of military training.

More On The Waas Report (This Could be the Smoking Gun)

Posted 11/23/05 at 1:00am by jamie

After reading

Murray Waas's
article a couple times, I think this could become the "smoking
gun" that proves Bush & Co. lied our nation into war. Just take the closing of
the article as an example:

Those grievances were also perhaps illustrated by comments that Vice
President Cheney himself wrote on one of Feith's reports detailing purported
evidence of links between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. In barely legible
handwriting, Cheney wrote in the margin of the report:

"This is very good indeed … Encouraging … Not like the crap we are all so
used to getting out of CIA."

Just by the tone of Cheney's side note you can tell he was becoming impatient
with the CIA reports. They weren't saying what he wanted to hear - Saddam had
direct ties to al Qaeda and September 11.

The CIA report detailed in the article goes along the lines of something I
have always believed:

One of the more intriguing things that Bush was told during the briefing
was that the few credible reports of contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda
involved attempts by Saddam Hussein to monitor the terrorist group. Saddam
viewed Al Qaeda as well as other theocratic radical Islamist organizations
as a potential threat to his secular regime. At one point, analysts
believed, Saddam considered infiltrating the ranks of Al Qaeda with Iraqi
nationals or even Iraqi intelligence operatives to learn more about its
inner workings, according to records and sources.

Cheney's Speech - Blah Blah Blah

Posted 11/21/05 at 6:40pm by jamie

Crooks and
Liars
has the video up of vice-President Cheney's comments to the AEI today.
He supported opposing views while still slamming Senators who feel the country
was mislead into war. Mr. Cheney should realize that those Senators are in the
company of a majority of this country.

He continued to say that Saddam would not comply with U.N. weapon inspectors.
I guess he should of watched the news coverage in 2002 when U.N. weapon
inspectors were destroying missiles in Iraq. Of course he also tried to reaffirm
a tie between Iraq and 9/11 once again. Kind of hard to defend yourself from
lying while standing in front of cameras and lying.

Some have suggested that liberating Iraq from Saddam Hussein we have
simply stirred up a hornets nest. The overlook a fundamental fact - we were
not in Iraq on September 11 2001 and the terrorists hit us anyway. The
reality is the terrorists were at war with our country long before the
liberation of Iraq and long before the attacks of 9/11.

Cheney did try and win the hearts of any military personnel who may have
heard his comments. He said that some people say the debate hurts our troops
when in fact he knows they will not waver because of debate at home. True he is
now calling most Republicans in Congress, including those who have served,
liars. They are the ones that continually bring up the so-called "negative
effect" those comments have on our troops.

More Lies, More Bushit

Posted 11/12/05 at 7:17pm by jamie

Bush tried to rewrite history yesterday by

saying
:

"more than 100 Democrats in the House and the Senate, who had access to
the same intelligence, voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power"


Today in the

Washington Post
, we find out he stretched the truth on that line.

President Bush and his national security adviser have answered critics of
the Iraq war in recent days with a two-pronged argument: that Congress saw
the same intelligence the administration did before the war, and that
independent commissions have determined that the administration did not
misrepresent the intelligence.

Neither assertion is wholly accurate.

The administration's overarching point is true: Intelligence agencies
overwhelmingly believed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,
and very few members of Congress from either party were skeptical about this
belief before the war began in 2003. Indeed, top lawmakers in both parties
were emphatic and certain in their public statements.

But Bush and his aides had access to much more voluminous intelligence
information than did lawmakers, who were dependent on the administration to
provide the material. And the commissions cited by officials, though
concluding that the administration did not pressure intelligence analysts to
change their conclusions, were not authorized to determine whether the
administration exaggerated or distorted those conclusions

Let's Get Ready To Vote (In Iraq)

Posted 10/14/05 at 11:01pm by jamie

In a few hours, Iraqis will be taking to the poll to either approve or reject
their new constitution. Historical in the sense of it being their first
constitution, the biggest story behind this vote will be the work done by the
Bush administration.

Is the constitution does pass, then we can be sure to hear a onslaught of
Bush supporters claiming victory over the anti-war movement. Even though it may
appear to be a victory on the outside, once you peel back the layers and look
inside it will still be much the same. Now the insurgents will truly have
something to revolt against.

Insurgents have already tried to hinder the preparations for the vote.

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Insurgents sabotaged power lines, knocking out
electricity and water across the Baghdad area Friday and plunging the
capital into darkness on the eve of a landmark vote on a constitution aimed
at defining democracy in a nation once ruled by Saddam Hussein.

For most of the day, Iraqis were hunkered down in their homes, with the
streets of the Iraqi capital almost empty hours before a 10 p.m. curfew and
the country sealed off from the outside world as borders and airports were
closed for Saturday's referendum.

The widespread power outage blamed on insurgents hit soon after sundown,
when Muslims break their daily fast during the holy month of Ramadan,
leaving Baghdad's skyline black except for pinpoints of light from private
generators.

Click here for full
article.

This most likely only a preview of what the next 24 hours will provide in
Iraq. The news coming out of the war torn country should be rather grim as
insurgents try and disrupt the vote.

Any Surprise?

Posted 8/25/05 at 9:59pm by jamie

From the AP

Iraqis Miss Third Constitution Deadline

By BASSEM MROUE, Associated Press Writer

The speaker of Iraq's Parliament announced a one-day extension early Friday
in talks on Iraq's new constitution — a fourth attempt to win Sunni Arab
approval for the draft. But he said that if no agreement is reached, the draft
would be presented to the people in an Oct. 15 referendum.

Hajim al-Hassani, speaking minutes after the midnight deadline, said that
after meeting for three days, "we found that time was late and we saw that the
matters will need another day in order to reach results that please everyone."

Earlier, however, a Sunni Arab negotiator said Shiites didn't even show up
for a late-night meeting, and two Shiite delegates told reporters they saw no
reason why the draft presented to the legislature Monday could not be
forwarded to the people for a referendum.

Although the constitution requires only a simple majority in the
referendum, if two-thirds of the voters in any three of Iraq's 18 provinces
vote against it, the charter will be defeated. Sunni Arabs are about 20
percent of the national population but form the majority in at least four
provinces.

Shiites and Kurds had accepted a draft on Monday but Sunni Arabs opposed
it, and al-Hassani granted three more days to try to bring the Sunnis on
board.

The parliament speaker said that discussions in the past three days were
"very good in which points of views were exchanged." He said they discussed
federalism, references to Saddam Hussein's Baath party and the constitution's
introduction.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter