strategist

Boehner’s Chief Of Staff Dies Unexpectedly

Posted 1/10/10 at 5:21pm by jamie

Via FOX News

A 46-year-old top aide to House Republican Leader John Boehner died suddenly, reportedly from a heart attack, the minority leader announced Sunday.

"It is with profound sadness and shock that I announce the passing of Paula Nowakowski, my longtime chief of staff, trusted aide, and friend, who died suddenly last night. Words cannot adequately express the sorrow and disbelief I and every member of our team are grappling with today in the wake of this stunning news," Boehner said in a statement on his House leadership Web site.

"We will remember Paula as she would want to be remembered -- as a tireless worker, faithful friend, rabid Detroit sports fan, whip-smart strategist, warrior for freedom, and devoted Catholic who counted President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II among her greatest heroes. She will never be replaced, or forgotten," Boehner continued.

Only 46. What a shocker.

Rollins: “Republicans Are Not Relevant”

Posted 3/5/09 at 4:41pm by jamie

Ed Rollins, former political director for Reagan and strategist for Huckabee, cuts through the BS and delivers some strong words for his party:

The battle to be the "de facto leader" of this party is akin to the question of who wants to steer the Titanic after it hit the iceberg. Who represents the party or its values is not relevant when only 26 percent of voters have a positive impression of the party at all and only 7 percent very positive, according to the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey.

The Democratic Party is the reverse, with 49 percent positive. When 60 percent of the country approves of the job President Obama is doing, every Republican leader is going backward.

Republicans are not relevant. We just lost two back-to-back elections (2006 and 2008), and obviously, what we are selling, the voters aren't buying. In the midst of the most severe economic crisis in my lifetime, we have a president who is taking the country on a dramatic sea change. This is what he said he would do and he is doing it. And where are Republicans? Right now we don't have the alternative ideas, a message or, more important, the messenger.

I really like the Titanic reference there.

Interesting enough, this brings me to something I saw last night on Rachel Maddow. She had Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty on. Pawlenty is considered one of the rising stars of the GOP, and he said something that goes right to the heart of the failing Republican argument.

Daschle Fear Starts

Posted 11/22/08 at 9:31am by jamie

daschle-cp-5868875 James Pethokoukis is scared that Daschle means the end of conservatism:

The GOP strategist had been joking about the upcoming presidential election and giving his humorous assessments of the candidates. Then he suddenly cut out the schtick and got scary serious. "Let me tell you something, if Democrats take the White House and pass a big-government healthcare plan, that's it. Game over. Government will dominate the economy like it does in Europe. Conservatives will spend the rest of their lives trying to turn things around and they will fail."

And it turns out that the fearsome harbinger of free-market doom is the mild-mannered ex-U.S. senator with the little, red glasses, Tom Daschle. He'll be the guy shepherding President Barack Obama's healthcare plan through Congress via his probable role as secretary of health and human services. At the core of Daschle's thinking on the subject is the creation of a "Federal Health Board that would resemble our current Federal Reserve Board" and ensure "harmonization across public programs of health-care protocols, benefits, and transparency." (Forget secretary of state, Hillary Clinton should shoot for chairman of Fed Health and run one seventh of the U.S. economy.) And the subject of that "harmonization" would be a $100 billion to $150 billion a year plan that would let individuals (and small businesses) buy insurance from private companies or from a government plan.

healthcare Ironically conservatives always pull out the “oh bad Europe” model when discussing the direction of America. That fact is that Europe is doing a lot better than the U.S. right now. But what really strikes me is how conservatives gawk over a $100 to $150 billion a year plan. They sure had no problem dumping that kind of money into a totally useless war. They sure don’t complain when the Pentagon continues to ask for more and more money every year. Yet when it comes to something that can provide a healthy and more productive workforce, they complain? Why do conservatives hate the American economy so much?

Healthcare costs are costing our economy business and jobs. That’s a proven fact. When companies have to fork out millions to insure their employees, that gives them less to pay their employees and cuts into the bottom line. In the manufacturing and service sector, those costs are also passed onto the consumer. Benefit costs actually account for close to 30% of compensation costs. Almost double that in Canada, where there is universal healthcare. And to rub salt into that wound, U.S. companies that move to Canada end up being able to pay their employees more, because they are saving so much money. That means that compensation costs are actually less to the north. Even GM CEO Rick Wagoner admits that healthcare alone adds about $1,500 to the cost of every car.

The New McCain Slogan: "Party First"

Posted 9/26/08 at 8:51am by jamie

That's what this has come down to. The House Republicans want to hold America hostage so that they can save their party - the exact same party that has caused this problem:

"At the end of the day, there's a lot of people thinking about how to rebuild this party," said GOP strategist Ed Rollins on CNN, "and do we want to rebuild it with John McCain, who's always kind of questionable on the basic facts of fiscal control, all the rest of it, immigration. And I think to a certain extent this 110, 115 members of this study group are saying, here's the time to draw the line in the sand."

"That's pretty scary stuff that they're thinking about party right now and not country, is that what you're saying?" responded host Anderson Cooper.

"I think they're, yes, they're thinking about themselves," said Rollins. "I think they don't think that the threat is as great as a lot of other people do."

This would go hand in hand with the House Republicans wanting to see the whole market collapse.

And what about John McCain? Well he is right in the thick of it:

"Bush is no diplomat," said a Democratic staffer, "but he's Cardinal freaking Richelieu compared to McCain. McCain couldn't negotiate an agreement on dinner among a family of four without making a big drama with himself at the heroic center of it. And then they'd all just leave to make themselves a sandwich."

Is that the man we want leading our country at this time, or ever? Perhaps it is time to declare the House Republicans and John McCain a new axis of evil. They are acting just like terrorists, putting their ideology before the good of the people.

McCain Keeps Getting Nastier

Posted 7/28/08 at 10:20am by jamie

And it isn't siting well with some in the GOP:

"I think John is treading on some very thin ground here when he impugns motives and when we start to get into 'You're less patriotic than me. I'm more patriotic,' " Hagel said on CBS's "Face the Nation." "I admire and respect John McCain very much. . . . John's better than that."

Now I know the wingnuts will quickly dismiss that as Hagel being a "RINO", but he isn't the only one. Apparently some who are closer to McCain aren't that happy either:

One GOP strategist with close ties to McCain's campaign said the new line of attack reflected the operation's "schizophrenic" nature. He said that tendency was also on display last week, as McCain spoke at length about media coverage of Obama rather than sticking with his plan to focus on the economy.

I say keep it up John. The more he sees that these attacks aren't working, the worse they will get. Before long America will see the real McCain - Mr. Hot Headed, temper tantrum McCain. Then it will really be fun.

Rove Still In Hot Water

Posted 11/3/05 at 2:17pm by jamie

Patrick Fitzgerald has met with attorney's of Matt Cooper to discuss Rove's
involvement with the leak case even more. Washington Post is reporting that
Fitzgerald is considering charging Rove with making false statements during the
investigation. This could happen in the next few weeks.

It may not take an indictment in the leak case to force Rove out of the White
House. This is from the same Washington Post article:

But some top Republicans said yesterday that Rove's problems may not end
there. Bush's top advisers are considering whether it is tenable for Rove to
remain on the staff, given that Fitzgerald has already documented something
that Rove and White House official spokesmen once emphatically denied --
that he played a central role in discussions with journalists about Plame's
role at the CIA and her marriage to former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, a
critic of the Iraq war.

"Karl does not have any real enemies in the White House, but there are a
lot of people in the White House wondering how they can put this behind them
if the cloud remains over Karl," said a GOP strategist who has discussed the
issue with top White House officials. "You can not have that [fresh] start
as long as Karl is there."

Full article

here

At the very least there seems to be a consensus at the White House that Rove
should at least issue an official apology for his involvement in the leak case.
This of course is not likely to happen with the investigation still going on.

The Hypocrite Congressman From Colorado

Posted 7/19/05 at 6:52pm by jamie

Rep. Tancredo (R-Co) told a Florida radio talk show that if terrorists would
use nuclear weapons against us, we would target their holy places such as Mecca.
Needless to say this story is gaining momentum and the words the Congressman
used can have serious repercussions against not only our homeland, but also our
soldiers abroad.

Last week a Chinese General made a statement that if we would go to war
against China in order to defend Taiwan, they could strike us with nuclear
weapons. Ironically this was the same kind of rhetoric used by the Congressman.
Now on July 14, 2005, the Congressman issued a

press release
regarding this
General's comments:

Tancredo Slams Senior Chinese Official for Nuke Threat

Congressman Demands Apology, Repudiation of Threat from Chinese Government

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO) demanded an immediate
apology and unequivocal repudiation of Major General Zhu Chenghu’s nuclear
threat against the United States.

In an astonishing moment of candor, Zhu, a widely-published PRC defense
strategist and senior government official, told an assembly of foreign
reporters, “If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided
ammunition on to the target zone on China's territory, I think we will have to
respond with nuclear weapons.” Zhu went on to state that ‘China’s territory’
includes Taiwan, Chinese warships and aircraft.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter