the tea party

So How Bad Is Congress?

Posted 12/29/11 at 11:49am by jamie

I'm sure many have seen this chart before, showing communism being more popular than Congress:

But is it as bad as we think? Apparently so.

NPR as a lengthy article up examining just how bad Congress really is, and the conclusion is really, really bad. This quote should show you just how bad:

"There were a few really bruising periods in American congressional history, not only the run-up to the Civil War, but also around the War of 1812," he says.

Two periods in American History none of us could even begin to imagine living through, yet our Congress is viewed as badly now as then.

But it compares worst than other bad times for Congress:

Other periods of governmental deadlock include Andrew Johnson's Reconstruction presidency, Woodrow Wilson's conflict with Congress over the League of Nations and the fights between President Truman and the "do-nothing" 80th Congress in 1947-48.

"None of those involved the level of conflict within Congress itself that we see today," Feller says.

Ouch! But here's something that really could prove the case and something that I talked about in my last post:

In the pantheon of also-rans for least effective Congresses, Mann would add a contentious period circa 1910 when long-serving Republican House Speaker Joseph Cannon was ousted from his post mostly by renegades in his own party. There were also bruising fights over the Depression-era New Deal.

Could Boehner Be Done As Speaker?

Posted 12/29/11 at 10:38am by jamie

TPM has gathered a list of Republican members of Congress raising the possibility that John Boehner could see his short time as Speaker of the House come to an end in 2012:

“He’s (Boehner) got a big problem when he comes back,” one anonymous congressman claimed. “He may have a hard time keeping his Speakership after this.”

“We were hung out to dry by our leadership,” said another unnamed member.

My guess is that these unnamed members are most likely Tea Party members of Congress that really don't understand politics all that much. I don't really see Boehner losing his position as Speaker, mainly because this is a big election year and that would make the GOP look really bad.

On the other hand, if Boehner doesn't do some serious healing or explaining in the next couple of weeks, it could become a possibility. The GOP wants to look united going into an election and the payroll tax fight showed they weren't. What's even worst is that with Congress' approval in the 9% range and people viewing that branch as being completely broken having a totally Republican controlled Congress could lead to even more roadblock with the two chambers unable to agree.

My guess is that Boehner will hold onto his position, but only after being taken to the woodshed by his caucus. The Tea Party members will remind him that they are the reason the GOP got a majority in 2010 and the reason he is Speaker, so play nice or they will make life hell on him.

Whichever way it ends up going, one thing is for sure - it's going to be fun as hell to watch. Republicans have loved in the past pointing to a Democratic party divided, mainly over the 2008 primary and the healthcare battle. None of those begin to compare to what we are seeing in the GOP right now.

The Great Tea Party Divide

Posted 12/16/11 at 2:06pm by jamie

A lot of the Tea Party has been throwing their weight behind Newt Gingrich, but lately we have been seeing some big name former Tea Party candidates split off and endorse Mitt Romney.

It started earlier this week when Christine "I'm not a witch" O'Donnell came out and endorsed the Mittster. You got to give credit to the former Senate candidate - she made one of the most interesting endorsements EVER!

"He has been consistent since he changed his mind". That's like saying a killer hasn't been a killer since he last murdered.

Of course O'Donnell's interesting endorsement has lead to all kinds of fun for pundits and late night comedians alike.

But today we get another darling of the Tea Party coming out and throwing her weight behind the Mittster:

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney picked up the endorsement of South Carolina's Republican governor, Nikki Haley, on Friday in a move that could boost his fortunes in the early voting state.

Romney has been lagging in South Carolina and his backers in the state have been urging him to campaign more frequently there. South Carolina holds the first primary in the South on January 21 and former U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Newt Gingrich, who hails from neighboring Georgia, has a lead there.

What makes this endorsement extra juicy is the past relationship Haley had with another presidential hopeful, Michele Bachmann.

The Tea Party's Perceived Race Problem

Posted 12/14/11 at 4:50pm by jamie

Following up on my previous post about a new PPP poll out of likely Republican voters in Iowa, I want to point out a very important issue buried deep in the crosstabs (PDF).

Since it's inception the Tea Party has been viewed as being fueled by the fact President Obama is black. This is no dirty secret or anything and the Tea Party has constantly fought back against those claims. But when you look at the important issue of why the Tea Party would vote for someone, then you start seeing that race could be a big factor:

A lot of the Tea Party voters are more focused on someone able to beat President Obama than they are the actual issues. Compare that to people who say they aren't in the Tea Party, where 61% are more for the issues than the 26% for beating Obama.

How can the Tea Party explain this? According to this question Karl Marx could be running for President and if the Tea Party felt he could beat Barack Obama, they would vote for him.

It's this very type of question that explains why the Tea Party's favorable view has taken a serious nosedive over the past year. They get furious when we call them racists, yet their own responses to simple polling questions validate the very charges.

And there is even more proof in these crosstabs. Here's another question that I really find interesting:

Fading Newtmentum?

Posted 12/14/11 at 3:34pm by jamie

Some new polls out this week really show the problems the GOP is facing with only a little over 3 weeks before voting kicks off.

First off let's talk Iowa. This was being scene as a guarantee win for Newt Gingrich just a week ago, but that has now changed:

There has been some major movement in the Republican Presidential race in Iowa over the last week, with what was a 9 point lead for Newt Gingrich now all the way down to a single point. Gingrich is at 22% to 21% for Paul with Mitt Romney at 16%, Michele Bachmann at 11%, Rick Perry at 9%, Rick Santorum at 8%, Jon Huntsman at 5%, and Gary Johnson at 1%.

If you look at it in graph form, Ron Paul has really gained ground in the past week.

I always like looking at the graphs instead of the raw numbers because you can easily see trends. The one I see here is that Herman Cain's support didn't go to Romney or Gingrich, but rather to the more unlikely winners. Not only that, but these people have also peeled off support from the once front runners.

These numbers are the big eye catcher, but buried in the actual results (PDF) was something even more interesting

Q27 Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion
of the Republican establishment?
Favorable........................................................ 31%
Unfavorable .................................................... 31%
Not sure .......................................................... 38%

Tea Party Racism

Posted 12/12/11 at 1:00pm by jamie

Quick quiz. Who said the following:

If you’re against him [Obama] but you’re for this guy [Gingrich], it must be about race

Certainly you are thinking it must be some crazy leftist making this assertion. Of course thinking that would make you wrong.

That quote is from none other than Glenn Beck, the very man who helped push the Tea Party into prime time.

Beck made that assertion to Freedom Watch host Judge Andrew Napolitano on Fox News Friday night. You can watch the video yourself.

For once I must agree with Beck, but the problem is that the Tea Party has always been about race. These people didn't get upset when President Bush gave hundreds of billions to that banks in TARP. When news emerged a couple of weeks ago that Bush actually gave the banks trillions, did they get upset with Bush? Nope. Instead they tried to rewrite history and make Barack Obama President in 2007 and 2008.

The only thing the Tea Party is against is the fact there is a black man in the White House. We saw that outrage start during the 2008 election when people were proudly selling things like t-shirts saying "It's called a 'white' house for a reason' at Republican conventions. They showed their racism then and continue to show it today.

It's warming now to see one of their biggest cheerleaders call them out for the racists they are. Thank you Glenn Beck for admitting to reality. Maybe we can continue to expose these hate filled bastards for what they really are - today's KKK.

Serious Buyers Remorse Over The Tea Party

Posted 11/30/11 at 9:40am by jamie

The fad that is the Tea Party is starting to show real signs of fading:

Since the 2010 midterm elections, the Tea Party has not only lost support nationwide, but also in the congressional districts represented by members of the House Tea Party Caucus. And this year, the image of the Republican Party has declined even more sharply in these GOP-controlled districts than across the country at large.

Since the 2010 midterm elections, the Tea Party has not only lost support nationwide, but also in the congressional districts represented by members of the House Tea Party Caucus. And this year, the image of the Republican Party has declined even more sharply in these GOP-controlled districts than across the country at large.

And with the sinking of the Tea Party goes the sinking of the Republican Party as this chart shows:

11-28-11 #2

But wait! It gets even worse for them, which means better for the Democrats.

11-28-11 #3

The favorable rating of the Democrats is at least holding steady in the Tea Party districts and is now into positive territory overall.

35,000 Occupy Foley Park Last Night, But What Was Missing?

Posted 11/18/11 at 9:54am by jamie

Last night police estimated a crowd of about 35,000 occupying Foley Park. The above is one of the thousands of pictures that emerged from the event.

Looking through all these pictures, you know what I noticed is missing? I noticed things like this weren't there:

Nor this:

People came to this event out of true outrage. They weren't lured their by celebrity names and offered cushy rides on corporate sponsored buses. That is how the Tea Party gets people to their rallies.

The Occupy movement is 100% grassroots, unlike the astroturf Tea Party. Occupy is the most American movement we have seen in a generation and one the resembles the founding of our nation. In fact Occupy is far more aligned to the Boston Tea Party then the Tea Party will ever be, considering the actual Boston Tea Party was more about inequality than it was taxes. That's what Occupy is fighting against - inequality. The fact that the 1% continue to see their tax burden go down and their benefits from our nation go up, while the opposite happens to the 99%.

SB5 Went Down, But A New Fight Emerges

Posted 11/11/11 at 10:34am by jamie

The extreme right’s battle against organized labor is taking another turn in Ohio:

Just two days after voters overwhelmingly killed legislation restricting collective bargaining for public employees, Tea Party activists and a nonunion trade group Thursday launched a campaign to put a broader crackdown on union rights on the statewide ballot in 2012 or 2013.

The proposed right-to-work constitutional amendment would prohibit making union membership a condition of employment.

Chris Littleton of West Chester Twp. in Butler County, a Tea Party leader and co-founder of the Ohio Liberty Council, said at a Statehouse press conference that the amendment would provide “work place freedom for every single Ohioan.”

It takes signatures from 385,253 registered voters to put an amendment on the ballot and Littleton said that it might take until the November 2013 election to meet that requirement.

This appears might be going to far even for a lot of Republicans:

However, Republican leaders distanced themselves from the amendment. “Job creation” is the top priority, Rob Nichols, spokesman for GOP Gov. John Kasich, a key backer of Senate Bill 5, said in an email.

Actually this is nothing more than a continued assault on workers right by the extremists that have taken over America’s right. The people spoke in Ohio on Tuesday and told the state to stop limiting bargaining rights of Ohio’s public workers. The Tea Party, in their closed, cult like mindset, can’t acknowledge that so now they are going to try to make it even a broader assault. It’s no wonder that the Tea Party’s popularity is going down in flames. Thankfully more Americans have awoken to the bullshit these people push and are turning them away.

Is This The Definition Of “Pro-Family”?

Posted 11/4/11 at 11:43am by jamie

Palm meet face!

Though his family woes have been quite public as of late, U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh announced Thursday that the Family Research Council Action committee has named him a "True Blue" member of Congress for his "unwavering commitment and consistent support in defense of life and the family."

Walsh, a Tea Party favorite and a regular on cable news shows, has been on the defense in recent months after his ex-wife sued him for $117,437 in allegedly unpaid child support. Laura Walsh claims the congressman didn't pay up for his three children, but loaned his own campaign $35,000 and took international vacations. Walsh has denied these allegations, but a judge recently ordered him to produce proof that he paid up.

He cares about his own family so much that he ignores his financial obligations to them, even the court ordered ones. Welcome to another example of “responsibility” brought to you by your Republican Party and the Tea Party.

How Can Anyone Survive On Only $400k A Year?

Posted 9/19/11 at 3:01pm by jamie

My heart weeps for this poor fellow:

Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) appeared on MSNBC with Chris Jansing this morning to attack President Obama’s new deficit reduction plan, which includes some tax increases on the wealthy. Taking up the typical GOP talking point, Fleming said raising taxes on wealthy “job creators” is a terrible idea that kills jobs because many of these people are small business owners who pay taxes through personal income rates.

Fleming is himself a businesses owner, so Jansing asked, “If you have to pay more in taxes, you would get rid of some of those employees?” Fleming responded by saying that while his businesses made $6.3 million last year, after you “pay 500 employees, you pay rent, you pay equipment, and food,” his profits “a mere fraction of that” — “by the time I feed my family, I have maybe $400,000 left over.

We should tax the middle and lower class more, take away healthcare for poor children, close schools and dismantle government just so this man from the party of the “common man”, the Tea Party can survive. 

Welcome to the sick and twisted views of America’s Tea Party. They champion people who complain about living on only $400k a year, yet insult those who only make $20,000 all while saying they believe in Jesus. The Tea Party isn’t a “party” – it’s a god damn mental illness!

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter