voting machines

108 Voting Machines Shut Down In Kentucky

Posted 11/4/08 at 1:28pm by jamie

And here we go:

More than 100 voting machines in Kenton County have been shut down on a judge's order.

Secretary of State spokesman Les Fugate said at least two machines in Kenton County weren't properly registering straight-ticket votes.

The malfunctions could affect the tightly contested state Senate race between incumbent Republican Jack Westwood of Crescent City and Democrat Kathy Groop, an activist with a public relations background.

Hopefully a left ran government will do away with these destroyers of democracy.

Bad Voting Machines = Need For Voter ID

Posted 1/12/08 at 11:48am by jamie

This was an interesting exchange on Bill Maher last night:

So because companies like Diebold create very unsecure machines that means the voter must be put through the ringer and provide ID - that according to Tony Snow.

Here's something that isn't talked about enough on Voter ID - a poll tax. Most states require a fee for a state issued ID or drivers license. Since this is required to vote that means we have to pay to vote. Also considering the new requirements they are putting in requiring citizens to have these IDs no matter what then it can also be considered a tax. Looks like the Republicans are the party of increasing your taxes - in the form of required government bullshit.

Why Does Diebold Continue To Use Microsoft?

Posted 4/29/07 at 9:54am by jamie

I have raised this question before; why does Diebold choose Microsoft for their voting machines over Linux? Linux is much more secure, much more customizable, and, possibly the biggest reason, much cheaper (Linux is free). We find this week that this question still needs to be raised:

Problems found in an audit of Diebold tabulation records from an Ohio November 2006 election raise questions about whether the database got corrupted during the tabulation of election results, says a report released today (pdf).

The document, from a team of researchers tasked with auditing the November election in troubled Cuyahoga County, have called for a thorough examination of the database to determine if corruption did occur and the extent to which it may have affected the election results.

Among the report findings:

Vote totals in two separate databases that should have been identical had different totals. Although Diebold explained that this was part of the system design for separate vote tables to get updated at different times during the tabulation process, the team questioned the wisdom of a design that creates non-identical vote totals.

Tables in the database contained elements that were missing date and time stamps that would indicate when information was entered.

Entries that did have date/time stamps showed a January 1, 1970 date.

The database is built from Microsoft's Jet database engine. The engine, according to Microsoft, is vulnerable to corruption when a lot of concurrent activity is happening with the database, such as what occurs on an election night when results are uploaded and various servers are interacting with the database simultaneously. This is why Microsoft advises against using the Jet engine in a complex environment:

While We Are "Spreading Democracy"

Posted 10/14/06 at 1:51am by jamie

We get more proof that our own democracy is under attack:

voteincases2.gifSome U.S. states have placed laws to make it difficult to vote instead of reforming ballot problems. The study looked into 10 states with reported ballot difficulties.

The study cited proposed laws in Arizona and Georgia, that call for a government-issued photo identification card and proof of citizenship before voting.

Tova Wang of The Century Foundation think tank said that although both state laws were denied by judges, "the damage has already been done." The proposals confused voters and delayed voter registration drives.

The lack of definite electronic voting policies and machines were also mentioned saying that it could lead to longer voting lines in the upcoming midterm contest.

"There were long lines because there were inequitably distributed voting machines," Wang said.

Florida and Washington, for example, have no formula for determining the number of voting machines in each precinct, the study said.

After the 2004 incident in Ohio, a law was approved providing one machine for every 175 registered voters although it will not be enacted until 2013.

The study concluded that, "none have come close to addressing in full the major problems that plagued the system during the last federal election."

The states included in the survey were Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Washington and Wisconsin.

Isn't it great to be in the "beacon of democracy"? If we continue down this road then we might as well rip up the Constitution and start over.

Ohio Election Officals Indicted!

Posted 4/6/06 at 2:13pm by jamie

Yesterday it was uncovered that Ohio's top election official owned stock in Diebold during the 2004 election. Today we find out some Ohio election officials have been indicted for for skirting the rules to avoid a recount:

After the 2004 presidential election, Cuyahoga County election workers secretly skirted rules designed to make sure all votes were counted correctly, a special prosecutor charges.

While there is no evidence of vote fraud, the prosecutor said their efforts were aimed at avoiding an expensive - and very public - hand recount of all votes cast. Three top county elections officials have been indicted, and Erie County Prosecutor Kevin Baxter says more indictments are possible.

Michael Vu, executive director of the Cuyahoga County elections board, said workers followed procedures that had been in place for 23 years. He said board employees had no objection to doing an exhaustive hand count if needed, meaning they had no motive to break the law.

Internet bloggers have cried foul since 2004 about election results in Ohio, one of the key states in deciding the election. They have been tracking Baxter's investigation with online posts about the indictments.

Since November 2004, there have been so many stories like this coming out that it is hard to keep track of them all. It is also hard to believe that Bush did actually carry this state. True when the state's top election official promises to deliver Ohio to Bush and was also his campaign manager then something is wrong. When the head of the company that makes the voting machines promises to help deliver the election to Ohio then something is wrong. Wake up people - SOMETHING IS WRONG.

Ohio's Top Election Offical Had Investments In Diebold!

Posted 4/4/06 at 4:02pm by jamie

Oh this is the accident of all accidents:

The state's top elections official said Monday he accidentally invested in a company that makes voting machines.

Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, who is seeking the Republican nomination for governor, said he discovered the shares for Diebold Inc. while preparing a required filing for the Ohio Ethics Commission.

"While I was unaware of this stock in my portfolio, its mere presence may be viewed as a conflict and is therefore not acceptable," he said in a letter included in his filing.

Blackwell said his investments are directed by an accountant and financial adviser without his knowledge or help, "similar to a blind trust."

A "blind trust". So the man in charge of elections here also had financial ties to the company that makes the machines. Don't forget that Blackwell also promised to deliver Ohio to Bush in 2004 and was head of his campaign in Ohio. If there are any doubts that Blackwell is one crooked bastard then those should now be brushed aside.

Tech Update - Diebold Out Of N.C.

Posted 12/1/05 at 6:36pm by jamie

I

reported on Diebold
looking to pull out of North Carolina because of a court
order to turn over their source code and list of programmers who helped develop
the software that runs their voting machines. Their argument lied within the
Operating System which is Windows. They argued they could not give the Window's
source code or list of all programmers who worked on development of the world's
most popular operating system.

Since that report, Diebold has pulled the plug on North Carolina and they are
now safe from the crooked hands that controls a majority of this countries
voting. According to
Brad at the Brad Blog
, Diebold could not get a court to rule for a special
exception on behalf of Diebold and this has sparked their sudden abandonment of
North Carolina.

One of the arguments I brought up was the selection of Windows for their
operating system. Windows is loaded with security flaws and that is evident by
the number of updates Windows owner's receive from the Microsoft site. In the
tech world it is referred to as "Security Patch Tuesday" since that is the day
when Microsoft generally releases all their patches.

Today while getting my daily dose of tech article readings in, I noticed one
that addresses the very security flaws in Windows that could jeopardize the very
democracy we all hold near.
George Ou of ZDNet
is asking why Microsoft just doesn't release all their
patches and get it over with. A good question and one that would make one wonder
why Diebold still puts the stock of our democracy in this flawed operating
system:

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter