war in afghanistan

Everything Is Not A Conspiracy!

Posted 3/23/11 at 3:36pm by jamie

Let’s face it, we live in a world of people who do dumb things. They can be teachers, police, firefighters, doctors, politicians, doctors and yes, even military personnel. So when new images came out this week of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan posing with dead Afghan civilians, once again I thought “we got really dumb people in this world”. Of course that didn’t stop the right from launching an attack of the “far left international media”:

Far left international media outlets are reporting that US soldiers posed with the dead bodies of “defenseless” Afghanistan civilians. Der Spiegel reported that the US soldiers “killed Afghan civilians for fun, humiliating their victims with horrific pictures.” It is not known how Der Spiegel acquired the photos.

Jim Hoft, AKA Gateway Pundit, concluded that post with this:

So how did they get these photos? Who took them and what proof do they have that this is actually what took place?
I wait anxiously to hear the rest of the story.

Well we might not have found out the “rest” of the story, but today we found out a big chunk of it:

A 22-year-old U.S. soldier pleaded guilty Wednesday to the murders of three unarmed Afghan civilians in a war crimes probe that implicates a dozen members of his platoon and has raised some of the most serious criminal allegations to come from the war in Afghanistan.

Yes They Really Are That Dumb

Posted 11/27/10 at 8:50am by jamie

idiocracy1Remember when the right thought Stephen Colbert was the real deal? They believed he was really a right wing comedian/commentator and couldn’t seem to understand that his whole routine is making fun of the right. Well those righties haven’t become any smarter since then:

Fox News' opinion website Fox Nation and their readers don't seem to know satire when they see it.

The Fox News sister site re-posted a joke from the satirical website The Onion Friday about President Barack Obama sending a 75,000-word e-mail to the the entire nation. At no point does Fox Nation note that the story is a satire.

The Onion story joked that Obama had "reached the end of [his] rope" and sent out the "rambling" stream of consciousness e-mail that addressed everything from the war in Afghanistan to his live-in mother-in-law.

At this rate the right will make the movie Idiocracy become a reality.

How Drudge’s Lies Become GOP Talking Points

Posted 11/5/10 at 8:09am by jamie

It all started early in this week. On the front page of Drudge was a big story saying that President Obama’s India trip would cost $200 million per day. By the next day it was being pushed by the GOP:

However, instead of answering that question, Bachmann wanted to talk about President Obama's upcoming trip to India -- and the insane amount of money he's spending each day.

"Well I think we know that just within a day or so the President of the United States will be taking a trip over to India that is expected to cost the taxpayers $200 million a day," Bachmann said. "He's taking two thousand people with him. He'll be renting out over 870 rooms in India. And these are 5-star hotel rooms at the Taj Mahal Palace hotel. This is the kind of over-the-top spending, it's a very small example, Anderson."

What Drudge did was post a link to some obscure India news outlet. Without fact checking it, Michele Bachmann takes the false story and runs with it. Here’s what a little fact checking would have shown:

Snopes.com, a website devoted to myth busting, noted that even if the Indian press has correctly reported the size of the president’s entourage – 3,000 – the cost would work out to $66,000 per person per day, “a figure that stretches credulity to the breaking point.” Factcheck.org noted that the entire war in Afghanistan costs $190 million a day.

Not Bush’s War

Posted 2/16/10 at 8:08am by jamie

When you ignore Afghanistan for 7 years then you never get stories like this:

The Taliban’s top military commander was captured several days ago in Karachi, Pakistan, in a secret joint operation by Pakistani and American intelligence forces, according to American government officials.

The commander, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, is an Afghan described by American officials as the most significant Taliban figure to be detained since the American-led war in Afghanistan started more than eight years ago. He ranks second in influence only to Mullah Muhammad Omar, the Taliban’s founder and a close associate of Osama bin Laden before the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mullah Baradar has been in Pakistani custody for several days, with American and Pakistani intelligence officials both taking part in interrogations, according to the officials.

This is a great accomplishment for the military and administration, but for some reason I feel Dick Cheney will consider it a major failure.

War On Christmas Warning!!!

Posted 12/4/09 at 10:56am by jamie

I reported about the outrage of Tuesday night’s address by President Obama upsetting some because it was at the same time as A Charlie Brown Christmas. Well Russell Wiseman, the mayor of Arlington Tennessee has taken it to an even more extreme level:

In the opinion of Arlington Mayor Russell Wiseman, President Barack Obama's speech on Tuesday night on the war in Afghanistan was deliberately timed to block the Christian message of the "Peanuts" television Christmas special.

Wiseman made the statements on his Facebook page, where he declared Obama to be a Muslim. Only people on Wiseman's "friend's list" had access to the post. He has more than 1,600 friends on Facebook.

"Ok, so, this is total crap, we sit the kids down to watch 'The Charlie Brown Christmas Special' and our muslim president is there, what a load.....try to convince me that wasn't done on purpose. Ask the man if he believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and he will give you a 10 minute disertation (sic) about it....w...hen the answer should simply be 'yes'...."

"A Charlie Brown Christmas," which first aired in 1965, has become an endearing program for many because of its emphasis on the "real meaning of Christmas," including Linus' memorable reading from the Gospel of Luke of Jesus' birth.

Cheney Accuses Obama Of ‘Dithering’

Posted 10/22/09 at 8:43am by jamie

OK this is beyond priceless:

Former Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday night accused the White House of dithering over the strategy for the war in Afghanistan and urged President Barack Obama to "do what it takes to win."

"Make no mistake. Signals of indecision out of Washington hurt our allies and embolden our adversaries," Cheney said while accepting an award from a conservative national security group, the Center for Security Policy.

And how long did Bush “dither” when it came to Iraq? Which administration pulled Afghanistan from the brink of victory and plunged us back to a situation worse than when the war first started?

Those are serious questions that have very serious, yet obvious answers. There is even a more important question though – why is Cheney out there saying this? Doesn’t he know that this destroys the morale of our troops and becomes propaganda for our enemies? I mean if this was pre-Obama that’s exactly what Cheney would be saying if someone on the left said this exact same thing. As matter of fact that’s exactly what they did numerous times.

So the final question – why does Dick Cheney hate America and our troops?

"Grave and Deteriorating" Crisis

Posted 12/6/06 at 5:08pm by jamie

That is what the Iraq Study Group is now calling Bush's failed war in Iraq.

The United States should begin to withdraw its forces from combat in Iraq and launch a diplomatic push, including Iran and Syria, to prevent "a slide toward chaos" in the country, a high-level panel recommended on Wednesday.

The bipartisan Iraq Study Group also pushed Washington to reduce its political, military or economic support for Iraq if its government fails to advance security and national reconciliation in the country, where sectarian violence kills scores of people every day.

It also called for the Bush administration to engage with Iran and Syria, whom U.S. officials accuse of fomenting the insurgency in Iraq, and to press for a "comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace" to settle the festering conflict.

Of course there are those who are pissed off about this report. These are the people who feel we should continue down a path of disaster, leaving our military weak and our country vulnerable. Here is a key excerpt from the wingnut haven Red State:

Bush's Definition of Fiscal Responsibility

Posted 3/30/06 at 2:22pm by jamie

We still got seniors who can not afford vital medications because of the new Medicare plan. New Orleans still looks like a third world country as the entire Gulf Coast region fights to get money so they can rebuild. Our nation's infrastructure is crumbling. A drive down any road proves that.

So with all those items, which require money, where are the administration's fiscal priorities? Insight Magazine, the conservative publication, tells us where some of that money is going:

The Bush administration, amid record budget deficits, has been spending huge amounts on advertising and public relations contracts to counter a hostile media environment.

The administration spent $1.62 billion on advertising and public relations contracts over two and a half years. Most of the money was spent by the Defense Department amid its efforts to recruit soldiers for the war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"The extent of the Bush administration's propaganda effort is unprecedented and disturbing," said Rep. George Miller, California Democrat.

Isn't it about time that we recognize the REAL threat to the Homeland?

Posted 3/26/06 at 2:07pm by Anonymous (not verified)

Joe Lieberman: Loves Our Leader; Hates Grandmothers

Keeping America Safe from Raging Grannies

Domestic spying on anti-war groups forces ACLU into action

( via The People's Republic of Seabrook)

It's time for Democrats who distrust President Bush to acknowledge that he will be the commander in chief for three more critical years and that in matters of war we undermine the president's credibility at our nation's peril.

- Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-CT)

In the four-plus years since the 9.11 attacks, much time, effort, and money has been expended in the effort to keep our country safe from terrorism. We've gone to war in Afghanistan, created our own home-grown terrorist threat in Iraq so we could claim to be fighting terrorism, and we've ramped up the propaganda/fear machine in this country to almost unsustainable levels. All this time, though, it would appear that our government is only just now beginning to recognize that the gravest and most significant threat to our nation's security: Seattle's Raging Grannies. Yes, America, while our attention has been focused on swarthy, unwashed men espousing violent, radical Islam, here at home a collection of seemingly benign grandmothers bearing beatific smiles and plates of oatmeal cookies poses an even more significant risk to our safety and Our Way of Life.

Man...who would have thought that the biggest threat was right here at home, baking cookies under our collective nose?

Bush's Ally - Osama Bin Laden

Posted 8/7/05 at 6:45pm by jamie

Appearing this week in
Newsweek:

Exclusive: CIA Commander: We Let bin Laden Slip Away

Newsweek

Aug. 15, 2005 issue - During the 2004 presidential campaign, George W. Bush
and John Kerry battled about whether Osama bin Laden had escaped from Tora
Bora in the final days of the war in Afghanistan. Bush, Kerry charged, "didn't
choose to use American forces to hunt down and kill" the leader of Al Qaeda.
The president called his opponent's allegation "the worst kind of
Monday-morning quarterbacking." Bush asserted that U.S. commanders on the
ground did not know if bin Laden was at the mountain hideaway along the Afghan
border.

But in a forthcoming book, the CIA field commander for the agency's
Jawbreaker team at Tora Bora, Gary Berntsen, says he and other U.S. commanders
did know that bin Laden was among the hundreds of fleeing Qaeda and Taliban
members. Berntsen says he had definitive intelligence that bin Laden was holed
up at Tora Bora—intelligence operatives had tracked him—and could have been
caught. "He was there," Berntsen tells NEWSWEEK. Asked to comment on
Berntsen's remarks, National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones passed
on 2004 statements from former CENTCOM commander Gen. Tommy Franks. "We don't
know to this day whether Mr. bin Laden was at Tora Bora in December 2001,"
Franks wrote in an Oct. 19 New York Times op-ed. "Bin Laden was never within
our grasp." Berntsen says Franks is "a great American. But he was not on the
ground out there. I was."

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter