warrantless wiretaps

White House After All Your Emails

Posted 1/14/08 at 5:28pm by jamie

Here we go again!

National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell is drawing up plans for cyberspace spying that would make the current debate on warrantless wiretaps look like a "walk in the park," according to an interview published in the New Yorker's print edition today.

Debate on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “will be a walk in the park compared to this,” McConnell said. “this is going to be a goat rope on the Hill. My prediction is that we’re going to screw around with this until something horrendous happens.”

Hey Bush - you can look at my emails when I can look at yours. Oh wait you destroy yours.So to quote your VP "go fuck yourself!"

Here We Go With Terror Threats Again

Posted 6/6/06 at 1:42pm by jamie

Well you can tell elections are getting closer when you hear of news like this:

U.S. officials believe Canadian arrests over the weekend and three recent domestic incidents in the United States are evidence the U.S. will soon be hit again by a terrorist attack. Privately, they say, they'd be surprised if it didn't come by the end of the year, reports CBS News correspondent Jim Stewart in a CBS News exclusive.

The first of the domestic incidents, all of which drew little attention at the time, began with the holdup of a string of Torrance, Calif. gas stations last summer. Muslim converts who bonded together in prison planned to use the robberies to finance attacks on 20 Army recruiting stations.

Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton admits they stumbled on the plot during a search.

"Make no mistake about it," Bratton said. "We dodged a bullet here — perhaps many bullets."

Now why is it we only hear about these "foiled terror plots" during election season or when the legality of something Bush is doing is in question? Because he has to use them to his benefit. What would be interesting to hear is if these plots were foiled because of warrantless wiretaps.

Now if there is another terrorist attack in our country then we must blame the President as much as we blame the terrorists. What more can Bush shred on civil rights and liberties in the name of "protection"? Wait - don't answer that.

FISA Misunderstood

Posted 1/26/06 at 5:31pm by jamie

One of the arguments that we keep hearing about the warrantless wiretaps is
that it could of helped prevented 9/11 if the "tool" was available prior to the
attacks. That is another point that is totally false. The FBI actually wanted to
tap Moussaoui prior to the attacks but didn't do so because their lawyers had a
"misunderstanding" of how FISA actually worked.

This is proven in an article from September 25, 2002 in the Washington Post:

The frantic efforts of Minnesota FBI agents to search the computer and
belongings of suspected terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui in August 2001 were
thwarted by lawyers at FBI headquarters who misunderstood the law on foreign
intelligence surveillance warrants, a congressional committee was told
yesterday. Had the agents succeeded in obtaining a special intelligence
warrant in the weeks leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks, they would have
found materials that could have led them to al Qaeda members -- including
hijackers Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi -- who had gathered for a key
meeting in Malaysia in January 2000, Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.), a member of
the panel, said yesterday.

In the third of a series of critical reports, staff members of the
House-Senate committee probing the performance of intelligence agencies
reported that Minneapolis FBI agents spent three weeks trying to meet a
legal standard that was not required. The agents, fearful that Moussaoui was
somehow part of a U.S. plot, desperately tried to prove that Chechen rebels
to whom Moussaoui was linked were in turn agents of Osama bin Laden's terror
network.

Some Things To Check Out

Posted 1/23/06 at 4:59pm by jamie


Think Progress
has some great details on the White House lying about Bush's
meetings with Abramoff. Head on over and check them out.


AMERICABlog
has done some great checking into Osama's ties with Republicans
in defense of the Chris Matthews smear campaign against the left.

Crooks and
Liars
has the video clip up of John McCain saying he feels the warrantless
wiretaps are illegal. Add another name to our side.

The Return of Gore

Posted 1/12/06 at 5:19pm by jamie

This should really spark a heated discussion and calls of partisanship from
the right:

Former Vice President Al Gore will deliver a scathing speech Monday at
Constitution Hall in Washington -- just blocks from the White House -- at
which he will declare America is faced with a constitutional crisis, RAW
STORY has learned.

The Martin Luther King, Jr. Day speech is set to take place at noon at
the Daughters of the American Revolution's Constitution Hall. Gore will be
introduced by onetime Georgia Republican congressman Bob Barr.

A source close to the erstwhile vice president related details of Gore's
expected speech to RAW STORY Thursday. The source noted that Gore prepares
the final editions of his speeches just before he delivers them, but that
the tenor of the speech would focus on what the Tennessee Democrat has
described as a President acting above the law

Article continues

here
.

We can expect the right wing pundits to counter with "Gore is trying to set
the stage for a 2008 White House run" or something along those lines. One key
here is the fact that Bob Barr will be introducing him. Barr has been one of the
most outspoken people on the right when it comes to condemning Bush's
warrantless wiretaps.

Some History Of Wiretapping

Posted 12/22/05 at 3:32pm by jamie

Leave it to the awesome reporting of the Nation to remind us of historical
facts we may have forgotten about:

For the generations who came of age after the mid-1970s, it is worth
recalling why warrantless domestic surveillance so shocks the political
system. It needs to be repeated that the same arguments cited by
Bush--inherent presidential power and national security--sustained the
wiretapping of Martin Luther King Jr., unleashed illegal CIA domestic spying
and generated FBI files on thousands of American dissidents. It needs to be
repeated that in 1974, the articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon
included abuse of presidential power based on warrantless wiretaps and
illegal surveillance. It needs to be repeated that a few months later,
presidential aides named Cheney and Rumsfeld labored mightily to secure
President Ford's veto of the Freedom of Information Act, in an unsuccessful
attempt to turn back post-Watergate restrictions on homegrown spying and
government secrecy.

View complete article
here.

They hated oversight then and they hate it now. It is obvious they still
believe the President should be the ultimate power in our democracy. If they
haven't learned by now then they never will and need to be out of public office.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter