Intoxination

Who Was At Fault In Georgia?

McCain campaigned hard against Russia following the Georgia conflict this summer, so its no shock this information comes out after the election:

Newly available accounts by independent military observers of the beginning of the war between Georgia and Russia this summer call into question the longstanding Georgian assertion that it was acting defensively against separatist and Russian aggression.

Instead, the accounts suggest that Georgia’s inexperienced military attacked the isolated separatist capital of Tskhinvali on Aug. 7 with indiscriminate artillery and rocket fire, exposing civilians, Russian peacekeepers and unarmed monitors to harm.

The accounts are neither fully conclusive nor broad enough to settle the many lingering disputes over blame in a war that hardened relations between the Kremlin and the West. But they raise questions about the accuracy and honesty of Georgia’s insistence that its shelling of Tskhinvali, the capital of the breakaway region of South Ossetia, was a precise operation. Georgia has variously defended the shelling as necessary to stop heavy Ossetian shelling of Georgian villages, bring order to the region or counter a Russian invasion.

A lot of experts said that the conflict was actually reversed from the Washington meme; it was Russia defending a sovereign nation that Georgia had attacked. If this is truly the case then the U.S. and a lot of the world has egg on their face, and its no wonder why Russia has been acting so much more defensive. When facing false allegations from a nation who has a track record of invading countries on lies (the U.S.), wouldn’t you also get defensive?

Exit mobile version