nixon

Markos Banned From MSNBC

Posted 7/8/10 at 10:27am by jamie

I meant to hit this story yesterday. It also exemplifies the problems I’ve posted about in the past when it comes to MSNBC.

Markos and Joe Scarborough got into a little Twitter back and forth a couple of months ago:

JoeNBC: The Sestak story is as unbelievable a cover story as Nixon throwing little Checkers under the bus. A farce on it's face. Luckily for the White House, the media has been negligent on this story since Day 1. The press will let this laughable story slide.

markos: Like story of a certain dead intern. RT @JoeNBC: Luckily for the White House, the media has been negligent on this story since Day 1.

Markos: But if you want to talk about bullshit "scandals", @JoeNBC, there's this one about Joe Sestak and the White House you might've heard of.

JoeNBC: @markos Unbelievable. You have a long history of spreading lies suggesting I am a murderer. This is the 3rd or 4th time by my count.

Markos: @JoeNBC, I've never suggested you're a murderer. I've noted media hypocrisy in going after Gary Condit. But he was Dem. You aren't.

JoeNBC: Anyone in media who interviews @markos, know that you're extending your credibility to someone who regularly suggests that I'm a murderer.

Markos: A bit touchy, @JoeNBC? Links for where I accuse you of being a murderer please.

Joe Scarborough, a person of such thin skin that he will block anyone that disagrees with him on Twitter, didn’t like that. Like a child being picked on in school, Joe ran and told the teacher principal, or in this case, the president of MSNBC. That resulted in this email being sent to Markos:

Markos,

Gun Meet Smoke

Posted 4/15/07 at 11:35am by jamie

This will certainly become a big thing at this week's hearings:

In the spring of 2006, Domenici told Gonzales he wanted Iglesias out.

Gonzales refused. He told Domenici he would fire Iglesias only on orders from the president.

At some point after the election last Nov. 6, Domenici called Bush's senior political adviser, Karl Rove, and told him he wanted Iglesias out and asked Rove to take his request directly to the president.

Domenici and Bush subsequently had a telephone conversation about the issue.

The conversation between Bush and Domenici occurred sometime after the election but before the firings of Iglesias and six other U.S. attorneys were announced on Dec. 7.

Now we have Bush directly involved in this, as well as Karl Rove. Now why would the White House's "political adviser" be involved in something that isn't supposed to involve politics, and why was the President allowing this? Only one answer makes sense - Bush knew and allowed a political firing of a U.S. attorney.

To make this issue stick even more, it looks like people in Domenici's own office are getting scared and now talking:

The Journal confirmed the sequence of events through a variety of sources familiar with the firing of Iglesias, including sources close to Domenici. The senator's office declined comment.

Good thing for Pete he has already lawyered up. With this big story coming out, it is no wonder why Fred Feilding is starting to be a little more cooperative with Congress. He must think this White House is worse off than Nixon's.

Josh has more on this.

Democrats Trying to Put the Brakes on Bush's Rewriting of History

Posted 3/15/07 at 9:08am by jamie

Funny how Bush always says that the historian's will judge him in the future and they will judge him as being a great leader and visionary. What makes it so funny is the fact that during his first year in office (two months after 9/11) he issued an executive order protecting Presidential records:

Overturning the Bush Executive Order. Under the Presidential Records Act, presidential records are supposed to be released to historians and the public 12 years after the end of a presidential administration. In November 2001, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13233 which overturned an executive order issued by President Reagan and gave current and former presidents and vice presidents broad authority to withhold presidential records or delay their release indefinitely. The Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2007 would nullify the Bush executive order and establish procedures to ensure the timely release of presidential records.

Transparency in government -eh? Looks like the Democrats are trying to get rid of that protection Bush has put in. Yesterday the amendments passed 333-93 in the House. During the debate yesterday Henry Waxman gave a great reason why this bill is so important:

What is interesting about this is that one other President tried to stop these records from being released. That President was Nixon. Pretty interesting coincidence there.

 Now the question remains if Bush will sign this into law or issue a signing statement saying that he doesn't have to follow it. We learn from our past - a concept Bush doesn't understand.

Bush Now In The 20's

Posted 5/12/06 at 4:27am by jamie

Oh yeah - the days of wishing for the 30's are now here:

President Bush’s job-approval rating has fallen to its lowest mark of his presidency, according to a new Harris Interactive poll. Of 1,003 U.S. adults surveyed in a telephone poll, 29% think Mr. Bush is doing an “excellent or pretty good” job as president, down from 35% in April and significantly lower than 43% in January.

Roughly one-quarter of U.S. adults say “things in the country are going in the right direction,” while 69% say “things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.” This trend has declined every month since January, when 33% said the nation was heading in the right direction. Iraq remains a key concern for the general public, as 28% of Americans said they consider Iraq to be one of the top two most important issues the government should address, up from 23% in April. The immigration debate also prompted 16% of Americans to consider it a top issue, down from 19% last month, but still sharply higher from 4% in March.

Look out Nixon - Bush is out to beat you now.

Some Afternoon Reads

Posted 1/26/06 at 8:48pm by jamie

The evidence of Abramoff and Bush together is
being scrubbed.

Bush is sounding alot more like

Nixon now
.


David Gregory won't back down
even when he is questioning the President
himself.

MYDD has released a new design with a new
feature called E-Wire.

If you can help out

Jesus General
then please head on over there.

Former NSA Director Hayden
apparently lied
to Congress.

If your looking for a good place to openly discuss and express your political
views then join me and others at
Political-Nutshell
.

Still Looking Like Fitzmas!

Posted 11/11/05 at 2:04am by jamie

According to Raw Story, Fitzgerald is
still seeking indictments against Karl Rove and could possibly have his top aide
testify before a grand jury as early as Monday.

Here's a short excerpt from the entire article

According to lawyers familiar with the case, Fitzgerald is trying to
convince the grand jury that Rove made false statements during the three
times he testified under oath and misleading statements to Justice
Department and FBI investigators when he was first interviewed about his
role in the leak in October 2003.

The attorneys told RAW STORY that Fitzgerald has called Rove?s former
personal assistant, Susan B. Ralston -- who was also a special assistant to
President Bush -- to testify before the grand jury for a third time, perhaps
as early as Monday. She is not said to be in legal jeopardy.

Full article can be viewed

here

At the bottom of the article is a correction noted by Raw Story that it has
been a total of four times Rove has testified.

This should help put to rest some of the rumors out there that Rove is free
and clear. He is anything but that. If he does get indicted any idea on how much
lower Bush's numbers will go? My guess is close to Nixon's!

Bush Takes Responsibility

Posted 9/13/05 at 5:52pm by jamie

Bush has accepted full responsibility for the governments failed response in
the days immediately following Katrina's land fall. "To the extent the federal
government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility," Bush said in a
joint press conference with Iraq's President this after noon.

Bush did reaffirm his desire to find out "what went right and what went
wrong".

This is actually kind of a shocking position for the President to take. His
typical arrogance seems to be going by the way side as he faces the lowest
approval rating in his career, hovering just above Nixon's approval at the time
he resigned.

This should make for a more interesting speech tonight as he takes this
responsibility in front of the nation. Myself, I am not to optimistic that it is
a much needed turn around into the way Bush is running the country. I think this
is more of a public relations "necessity" being initiated by his declining
approval rating and growing questions over the disaster.

 

Bush's Approval Rating Continues To Dive

Posted 8/27/05 at 3:47am by jamie

A new Gallup poll has Bush at his lowest approval rating yet.

PRINCETON, NJ -- A new Gallup Poll reflects further erosion in President
George W. Bush's job approval rating, continuing the slow but steady decline
evident throughout the year so far. The poll -- conducted Aug. 22-25 --
puts Bush's job approval rating at 40% and his disapproval rating at 56%
.
Both are the most negative ratings of the Bush administration. Bush's previous
low point in approval was 44% (July 25-28, 2005) and his previous high point
in disapproval was 53% (June 24-26, 2005).

He is only 6 points ahead of Nixon's approval rating, says a lot for this
corrupt President. Visit
Gallup for
more details and analysis on the current poll.

 

Bush Defines Accountability

Posted 7/23/05 at 6:03am by jamie

The President this week said he would fire anyone in his
administration that broke the law. Prior to that he said he would fire anyone
involved in the leaking of classified information. He also said he has
instructed everyone in his staff to fully cooperate with investigators.


Bloomberg News
reported yesterday that the investigation may now be focusing
not only on the leak but also perjury and obstruction of justice. Both Karl Rove
and Scooter Libby have given testimony that doesn’t coincide with the testimony
of reporters. The

Washington Post
and

LA Times
both have stories further going into this that will hit the news
stands Saturday morning.

Now since it appears that White House staff may not be
cooperating with investigators will that mean the President will discipline
them? I think we all know the answer to this already. “We are in the middle of
an ongoing investigation and will not prejudge.” This is sure to give Scott
McLellan another round of journalistic punches this week.

In 2000 we heard about a Republican from Texas who was
going to restore honor and dignity to the White House. Further more, this
candidate was also going to restore accountability to our government. He was
partly right. He did return something to the White House. He returned scandal
and controversy that now rivals the Nixon era.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter