Economy

Marc Thiesen Wants All Our Taxes To Go Up

Posted 12/29/12 at 9:49am by jamie

This has to be one of the most idiotic things I have read in ages. Shouldn't be shocking, coming from a former Bush writer:

Barring a last-minute breakthrough, taxes will go up for every U.S. taxpayer on Jan. 1 — and that’s a development conservatives should welcome.

Don’t get me wrong: It would be better not to raise taxes on anyone, pursue pro-growth tax reform and cut the size of government instead. But that’s not what the American people voted to do last month. Americans cast their ballots for big government.

Now it’s time to pay for it.

Until now, the growth of government under President Obama has not hit the pocketbooks of most Americans. During Obama’s first term, federal spending grew to more than 24 percent of GDP — the highest it has been since 1946. Yet almost no one in the country (except smokers and those who frequent indoor tanning salons) saw their taxes rise. Quite the opposite: 160 million Americans saw their payroll taxes reduced from 6.2 to 4.2 percent.

This is another example of Republicans thinking that the people are a bunch of idiots. If anyone could pick one thing they knew that Obama stood for it was raising taxes on the rich. It was one of the clearest points he made during the election.

But how about the growth of government under George Bush, Marc Thiesen's former boss? Let's look at it in graph form:

Time To Stick It To Corporate America!

Posted 12/3/12 at 11:59am by jamie

Think Progress has posted this stomach-turning chart:

The red line indicated corporate profits and the blue is the average wage of Americans. As you can see the profits have been sky rocketing to record levels, while wages continue to plummet.

CNN Money puts it into words here:

In the third quarter, corporate earnings were $1.75 trillion, up 18.6% from a year ago, according to last week's gross domestic product report. That took after-tax profits to their greatest percentage of GDP in history.

But the record profits come at the same time that workers' wages have fallen to their lowest-ever share of GDP.

So we have to record breaking pieces of information here; profits are at record highs and wages are at record lows.

This comes at a very critical time in our nation. With the fiscal cliff less than a month away, many on the right are content with middle class taxes going up, just to save the corporations some tax money. The thinking is the same, failed logic that GOP has been pushing for years; "if corporations have more money, they will hire more." It goes against the very basis of supply and demand economics and is a proven failure just by this data. The corporations do have the money, but they aren't hiring and they aren't paying.

Caterpillar Gives Employees A Big "F.U."

Posted 7/23/12 at 2:29pm by jamie

This just makes me sick:

JOLIET, Ill. — When it comes to dealing with labor unions, Caterpillar has long taken a stance as tough as the bulldozers and backhoes that have burnished its global reputation. Be it two-tier wage scales or higher worker contributions for health insurance, the company has been a leader in devising new ways to cut labor costs, with other manufacturers often imitating its strategies.

Now, in what has become a test case in American labor relations, Caterpillar is trying to pioneer new territory, seeking steep concessions from its workers even when business is booming.

Despite earning a record $4.9 billion profit last year and projecting even better results for 2012, the company is insisting on a six-year wage freeze and a pension freeze for most of the 780 production workers at its factory here. Caterpillar says it needs to keep its labor costs down to ensure its future competitiveness.

The company’s stance has angered the workers, who went on strike 12 weeks ago. “Considering the offer they gave us, it’s a strike we had to have,” said Albert Williams, a 19-year Caterpillar employee, as he picketed in 99-degree heat outside the plant, which makes hydraulic parts and systems essential for much of the company’s earth-moving machinery.

Their profits are skyrocketing and their CEO pay is on the rise, yet the people out there making the products are being screwed. In other words, Caterpillar is a Republican Mecca of business.

CAPITALISM: Profits Before Life

Posted 7/5/12 at 5:24pm by jamie

Many in our country feel that everything should be privatized, from road repairs to our military. Somehow they feel that corporations, which exist solely to make money, are a cheaper route than the government, which of course isn't in the profit business. It's one of the most infuriating and mind boggling ideas out there, and we are in a time of some totally bat shit crazy ideas about government.

We have already heard the nightmares of government contractors in Iraq. We've also heard the nightmare stories of privately run prisons and how they are making a mockery of our already highly broken justice system. But how about something else? How about a day at the beach? What could possible go wrong there if a private business takes over, say the lifeguard duties? Well check this out:

As lifeguards are paid and trained to do, Tomas Lopez rushed down the beach to rescue a drowning man — and then got fired for it.

The problem: Lopez stepped out of the beach zone his company is paid to patrol, a supervisor said Tuesday.

"I ran out to do the job I was trained to do," said Lopez, 21, of Davie. "I didn't think about it at all."

Now this story could have ended much worse, like the man drowning, but it still has a terrible ending - a man losing his job. And what is the justification for this harsh reaction by the man's employer, who should be holding him up as a hero?

Lifeguards in Hallandale Beach work for Orlando-based company Jeff Ellis and Associates, which has been providing lifeguard services for the city's beaches and pools since 2003.

Company officials on Tuesday said Lopez broke a rule that could've put beachgoers in his designated area in jeopardy. The firm could ultimately have been sued, officials said.

American Wealth Back To Levels Not Seen Since The Early 90s

Posted 6/12/12 at 10:30am by jamie

The fed has released their triennial report on American wealth and it's not good:

The recent recession wiped out nearly two decades of Americans’ wealth, according to government data released Monday, with ­middle-class families bearing the brunt of the decline.

The Federal Reserve said the median net worth of families plunged by 39 percent in just three years, from $126,400 in 2007 to $77,300 in 2010. That puts Americans roughly on par with where they were in 1992.

Kevin Drum even adds more disturbing news:

Despite these setbacks, consumers have continued to spend surprising amounts of money in recent years, helping to keep the economy growing at a modest pace. The survey underscores where the money is coming from: Americans are saving less for future needs and making little progress in repaying debts.

....The report highlighted the fact that households had made limited progress in reducing the amount that they owed to lenders. The share of households reporting any debt declined by 2.1 percentage points over the last three years, but 74.9 percent of households still owe something and the median amount of the debt did not change.

That is really bad news. Americans aren't saving or paying off their debt. Instead they are using all their money to either survive or purchase materialistic needs. That puts a lot of families one illness or layoff away from tragedy.

And as far as economic warfare? Well look at this chart and you decide if it's happening:

Why Haven't We Dealt With Speculation Before?

Posted 3/7/12 at 1:18pm by jamie

One big contributor to the housing crash in 2008 was speculation. One of the biggest drivers of oil prices is price speculation. Now President Obama wants to do something about it:

President Barack Obama announced Tuesday that he has asked Attorney General Eric Holder to "reconstitute" a task force examining oil and gas speculation.

But the task force, which Obama initially proposed last April when a big spike in gas prices sparked public outrage, has met only four or five times, mostly around the time it was created, and has not reported to the public on its activities, McClatchy News Service reported. Critics say the group has fallen short of its mission thus far.

While this is good news, I can't help but wonder why Obama has been so reactionary on speculation instead of taking a proactive stance. Speculation is like the entire country paying for a few rich people's trips to Vegas. They are gambling and their assets are all ours - our economy and cost of living. It's time to put an end to this crap once and for all. Let the actual market dictate price, not a few greedy gamblers.

Unemployment Now At 8.3%

Posted 2/3/12 at 10:22am by jamie

Some good news on the jobs front:

The United States economy gained momentum in January, adding 243,000 jobs, the second straight month of better-than-expected gains.

The unemployment rate fell to 8.3 percent, giving a cause for optimism as the economy shapes up as the central issue in the presidential election. The Labor Department’s monthly snapshot of the jobs market uses a different survey, of households rather than employers, to calculate the unemployment rate.

It still has a ways to go, but it is going in the right direction. If this trend continues we could see it back in the 7% range by summer. That would be a really great boost to help President Obama.

2012 Looking Good So Far For Job Numbers

Posted 1/5/12 at 8:59am by jamie

Let's hope this keeps up:

The news is all good for the jobs market so far in 2012: Separate reports Thursday showed a surge in private-sector job creation, a sharp drop in weekly unemployment claims and planned layoffs at their lowest level in six months.

Though the December data flowing in is sensitive to seasonal revisions, the trend is moving in the right direction.

Private-sector jobs surged by 325,000, according to ADP and Macroeconomic Advisors, while the government said weekly jobless claims fell 15,000 to 372,000 — still at an elevated level but consistent with recent data showing a consistent if grudging turnaround.

Goods-producing businesses created 176,000 positions in the month, according to ADP's payrolls count, while the goods-producing sector rose 52,000 and manufacturing increased 22,000.

Of course we aren't in the clear yet. Europe is still very much in trouble and a sudden collapse there will send world markets back into chaos, which will translate into layoffs again. Everything is tied to that global economy and we got to keep an eye on that.

But if we keep trending this way then jobs will become a smaller issue by the time we hit the general election. Even if unemployment is still around 7% by then, as long as it's moving down I doubt that voters would want to replace President Obama with someone else who might reverse that flow.

Basically out economy is still very fragile and can easily be sent back into chaos. Keeping the ripples out right now is very important and a change at Pennsylvania Avenue is a rather large ripple. Hopefully Democrats will seize on these numbers and show people that progress is being made on repairing the Bush economy that President Obama inherited, which was the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Sears To Close 100 to 120 Stores

Posted 12/27/11 at 12:38pm by jamie

This just caught my eye:

Sears Holdings Corp. plans to close between 100 and 120 Sears and Kmart stores after poor sales during the holidays, the most crucial time of year for retailers.

The closings are the latest and most visible in a long series of moves to try to fix a retailer that has struggled with falling sales and shabby stores.

In an internal memo Tuesday to employees, CEO and President Lou D'Ambrosio said that the retailer had not "generated the results we were seeking during the holiday."

Pretty much everyone knows that Sears has been a dying store, but that hasn't stopped Ohio Governor John Kasich from offering the once retail giant $400 million in incentives to move their operations from Chicago to Ohio. Even more troubling is that Kasich is willing to put such a big bet on a failing company, yet he wouldn't bet $20 million on a company that is already in Ohio and doing well - Chiquita.

Sounds like someone isn't doing their homework, or even checking the news. John Kasich is wanting to make very costly bets in our state and they don't appear that they will pay off. That makes me wonder what else could be driving his motivations behind this.

Good Housing Numbers, But A Mixed Bag

Posted 12/20/11 at 9:57am by jamie

Home ownership is a significant indicator of the health of our economy. One key indicator of how that segment is doing comes from new home construction. November's numbers actually look pretty good at first glance, jumping to 9.3%, but there is something buried inside that is also troubling:

But building permits, a gauge of future construction, rose nearly 11%. The increase was spurred by a 30% increase in apartment permits, to the highest level in three years.

Over the past year, apartment permits have surged roughly 63%. Single-family permits have increased just 6.6% in that time.

This is a mixed bag. The rise in apartment construction is spurred by two factors:

  • A flood of foreclosed and short sale homes on the market.
  • The inability of people to actual secure a loan for a new home.

Both of these factors are troubling. The first one indicates that we still have rather high foreclosure rate, something we can easily see by published reports, but also the short sales is troubling and that is something not so easily gauged.

The second item comes with having a period of long term unemployment. Being out of work for an extended time makes it harder to secure a loan for a new home. Not only that but with American's seeing their actual salaries decline, they also see their chances of securing a new home loan diminish.

Of course all of this could be indicative of where the U.S. economy is heading. We might be leaving the era of an ownership society and entering a time where renting becomes the new norm. That's good news and bad. It means more Americans will be living within their means, but at the same time their net wealth through assets will go down.

Pity Party For The Rich At The "Liberal" New York Times

Posted 12/13/11 at 10:27am by jamie

This story at the New York Times has me ready to kick kittens:

The share of income received by the top 1 percent — that potent symbol of inequality — dropped to 17 percent in 2009 from 23 percent in 2007, according to federal tax data. Within the group, average income fell to $957,000 in 2009 from $1.4 million in 2007.

Analysts say the drop largely reflects the stock market plunge, and most think top incomes recovered somewhat in 2010, as Wall Street rebounded and corporate profits grew. Still, the drop alters a figure often emphasized by inequality critics, and it has gone largely unnoticed outside the blogosphere.

OMG! We should start a fund to help out the rich in their tough times! Maybe 2010 will be even better and way in the future, say in 2011, they might really recover. Oh wait.....

The author of the article apparently didn't realize what year it was. Sure the top 1% saw their income decline in 2009, as did every other person in this county. But notice that one key line in there? "most think top incomes recovered somewhat in 2010". Now since a large part of this groups income is dependent upon the stock markets, let's have a look at it from 2007 to today:

So a stock market in the 9,000 range in 2009 would cause these people to lose money, yet we are approaching those 2007 levels again, meaning these people have recovered.

But facts won't stop this pity party:

An Over Supply Of Gas?

Posted 12/5/11 at 12:33pm by jamie

With the price of gas on the rise again, this is really shocking news:

The United States is awash in gasoline. So much so, in fact, that the country is exporting a record amount of it.

The country exported 430,000 more barrels of gasoline a day than it imported in September, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

That is about twice the amount at the start of the year, and experts and industry insiders say the trend is here to stay.

We always hear that if we want gas prices to go down one of the big answers is more refineries. Well apparently we have more than enough refining available if we are now in the export business.

And why are we exporting more than we are importing? It seems like it would make more sense to just say "hey - we're not going to import or export and use it all here". But this is the "global economy" and not much makes sense in that.

A 1%er Explains The Facts About Job Creation

Posted 12/2/11 at 8:50am by jamie

Nick Hanauer, a very successful venture capitalist, has a must read OpEd in Bloomberg News. In it he explains the very fundamentals of economics:

I can’t buy enough of anything to make up for the fact that millions of unemployed and underemployed Americans can’t buy any new clothes or enjoy any meals out. Or to make up for the decreasing consumption of the tens of millions of middle-class families that are barely squeaking by, buried by spiraling costs and trapped by stagnant or declining wages.

If the average American family still got the same share of income they earned in 1980, they would have an astounding $13,000 more in their pockets a year. It’s worth pausing to consider what our economy would be like today if middle-class consumers had that additional income to spend.
It is mathematically impossible to invest enough in our economy and our country to sustain the middle class (our customers) without taxing the top 1 percent at reasonable levels again. Shifting the burden from the 99 percent to the 1 percent is the surest and best way to get our consumer-based economy rolling again.

Hank Paulson Warned Hedge Funds Of Freddie/Fannie Collapse

Posted 11/29/11 at 6:21pm by jamie

Bloomberg is out with another article about the financial collapse. In it they report that former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, who was in charge during the collapse, gave insider information to hedge funders. The following alledgedly took place on July 21, 2008

At the Eton Park meeting, he sent a different message, according to a fund manager who attended. Over sandwiches and pasta salad, he delivered that information to a group of men capable of profiting from any disclosure.

Around the conference room table were a dozen or so hedge- fund managers and other Wall Street executives -- at least five of them alumni of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), of which Paulson was chief executive officer and chairman from 1999 to 2006. In addition to Eton Park founder Eric Mindich, they included such boldface names as Lone Pine Capital LLC founder Stephen Mandel, Dinakar Singh of TPG-Axon Capital Management LP and Daniel Och of Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC.

After a perfunctory discussion of the market turmoil, the fund manager says, the discussion turned to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Paulson said he had erred by not punishing Bear Stearns shareholders more severely. The secretary, then 62, went on to describe a possible scenario for placing Fannie and Freddie into “conservatorship” -- a government seizure designed to allow the firms to continue operations despite heavy losses in the mortgage markets.

Now who was President in 2008? Oh yeah! But again that is fact. Here's what Andrew Breitbart's Big Government is pushing this meme from their editor's new book, Throw Them All Out:

Cincinnati Loses An Icon

Posted 11/29/11 at 5:01pm by jamie

Cincinnati's iconic skyline has been called one of the most beautiful around. One building that helps make up that skyline is the Chiquita Center. Today Chiquita has announced that they are moving their operations from Cincinnati to Charlotte, North Carolina:

Chiquita Brands International, Inc. will relocate its headquarters to Charlotte, N.C., the company announced Tuesday afternoon. The move is expected to be complete by the end of 2012.

A North Carolina economic development panel approved a $22 million incentives deal to bring the global headquarters of banana giant Chiquita Brands International to Charlotte earlier in the day.

Members of the committee said the move of Chiquita's headquarters, along with research and development laboratories, will eventually bring a total of about 417 jobs to the area. The jobs are supposed to pay an average of about $107,000.

Cincinnati, like many other towns in America, is struggling economically. This loss of high paying jobs and revenue will be a serious blow to the area.

But this story comes as no shock. These talks have been going on for sometime. Even Governor John Kasich's office was involved with trying to keep the banana man here, but they failed. I guess working to strip public employees of bargaining rights was much more important that focusing on keeping a key employer in the region?

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Monthly archive

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter