Science

Where’s The “Drill Baby Drill” Crowd?

Posted 4/30/10 at 1:07pm by jamie

Funny how since the spill in the Gulf, the “drill baby drill” crowd has become silent. Shouldn’t they be out there advocating their position? Maybe they can highlight this part of their plan:

Louisiana health officials have ordered air quality testing after a “pungent fuel smell” blanketed “much of coastal Louisiana” and New Orleans. People along Florida’s Gulf Coast also noticed an “oily odor” that “leaves a bitter taste in your mouth” permeating the air. Officials say the smell could be from the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and are warning that people may experience “nausea, vomiting or headaches.”

Nothing like stepping out on a nice spring morning to the smell and taste of oil. MMMM MMMM good. Come on  now – let’s hear more “drill baby drill” chants by Sarah Palin and Michael Steele.

Headlines The Make Me Smile

Posted 4/30/10 at 9:06am by jamie

From USA Today:

Oil spill could sink Obama's offshore drilling plan

If there was ever a silver lining to something so horrible, this is it. But at what costs?

A third leak has been discovered, and a fire-fighting expert said the disaster may become the biggest oil spill ever.

[SNIP]

Some 5,000 barrels (210,000 gallons) a day were now thought to be gushing into the sea 50 miles off Louisiana's coast, said the US Coastguard's Rear Admiral Mary Landry.

Already people are saying this is going to trump Exxon-Valdez and could be the worst disaster in U.S. history. We really don’t need to increase the chances for this to happen by increasing offshore drilling and hopefully it is providing a serious wake up call to the White House.

Another Lesson In The Perils Of Off Shore Drilling

Posted 4/26/10 at 11:04am by jamie

The oil rig that sunk last week is now causing a serious environmental hazard:

Officials worked Sunday to try to stop oil leaks coming from the deepwater well drilled by a rig that sank last week near Louisiana, but they acknowledged that it could be months before they are able to stem the flow of what is now about 42,000 gallons of oil a day pouring into the Gulf of Mexico.

The response team is trying three tacks: one that could stop the leaks within two days, one that would take months and one that would not stop the leaks but would capture the oil and deliver it to the surface while permanent measures are pursued.

Officials determined through weather patterns that the sheen of oil and water, now covering 600 square miles, would remain at least 30 miles from shore for the next three days. But states along the Gulf Coast have been warned to be on alert.

“We have been in contact with all the coastal states,” Rear Adm. Mary E. Landry, the commander of the Eighth Coast Guard District, said at a news conference on Sunday. Emphasizing that the sheen was not estimated to hit shore anytime soon, Admiral Landry said contingency plans were being put in place.

The rig is leaking about 42,000 gallons of oil a day and the fix for it lies 5,000 feet below sea level.

This needs to be a warning about advocating more off-shore drilling (*COUGH* President Obama). Imagine a majority of coastal regions having to face this kind of threat. Not only does it put some of our most cherished real estate in jeopardy, but also the underwater life. Accidents like this don’t have a short-term impact either. Their consequences are usually felt for a generation, if not more.

“Cooking The Books” – My Fear Of #HCR Becoming A Reality

Posted 4/16/10 at 12:29pm by jamie

One of the biggest fears I had with the health care reform bill was insurers coming up with creative accounting methods to circumvent the requirements that they spend 85% of premiums on health care related costs. Now that fear is becoming a reality:

Some of the largest U.S. health insurers are changing their accounting practices to book administration costs as medical costs in an attempt to circumvent new industry reforms, according to a U.S. Senate panel's report released on Thursday.

Under the healthcare law passed in March, insurers must adjust their spending habits to meet new requirements. For example, large group plans must spend at least 85 cents of every premium dollar paid to them on actual medical care as opposed to administrative costs, while individual and small group plans must spend 80 cents.

And this is how bad it is:

For example, WellPoint Inc "has already 'reclassified' more than half a billion dollars of administrative expenses as medical expenses," it said.

There could be a hopeful silver lining to all this. If the Democrats remain in control of Congress and insurers cook the books to the point that health care costs are rising as much as they have over the past decade, well we will have another health care reform fight. This time it will have to be to put in real competition to the private sector and that can only come in the form of a public option. Actually this would be a perfect argument to get the public option in and might be what some Democratic leaders were thinking all along.

There’s An App For That, Unless It’s Denied

Posted 4/15/10 at 10:50am by jamie

As a developer one of the problems I have had with Apple is their closed App store and the hurdles that you must conquer just to get an app published. Here’s an example of that:

This week cartoonist Mark Fiore made Internet and journalism history as the first online-only journalist to win a Pulitzer Prize. Fiore took home the editorial cartooning prize for animations he created for SFGate, the website for the San Francisco Chronicle.

I spoke with Fiore about his big win and plans for his business. Fiore is not on staff at the Chronicle, or anywhere else; since 1999, he’s run a syndication business, selling his Flash animations à la carte to TV, newspaper, and magazine websites for about $300 a piece. (The price varies by size of the outlet.) In a typical month, he might have about eight clients. Before 1999, he ran a similar syndication business for his print cartoons, using a lower-price-per-image, higher-volume model.

When I asked about the next phase of his business, curious if it will include a mobile element, Fiore said he’s definitely hopeful about mobile devices. “I think the iPads and anything iPod to iPhone — to maybe a product not made by Apple — will be good or could be good for distributing this kind of thing,” he said.

But So Many Americans Want To Repeal Healthcare

Posted 4/14/10 at 2:18pm by jamie

It’s going to be the Republicans big campaign talking point this year – REPEAL! That might work for the crazies in the Tea Party, but a new poll shows that a big majority of those who support repeal actually want the bill repealed so we can get something better – a public option:

When asked how important they thought it was for Congress to work on “establishment of a public option that would give individuals a choice between government provided health insurance or private health insurance,” 67 percent of Americans rated this as an important topic to address. This finding is even more striking given the fact that 59 percent of those in favor of repealing the health care reform legislation rated the public option as important to pursue. Another surprise is that 67 percent of Republicans and 59 percent of Independents also agreed that the public option was an important topic to be addressed by Congress.

That really puts a crimp in the GOP arguments to just do away with reform.

HCR Confusion Sets In – Who’s To Blame?

Posted 4/7/10 at 1:02pm by jamie

We knew stories like this were only a matter of time:

Two weeks after President Barack Obama signed the big health care overhaul into law, Americans are struggling to understand how — and when — the sweeping measure will affect them.

Questions reflecting confusion have flooded insurance companies, doctors' offices, human resources departments and business groups.

"They're saying, 'Where do we get the free Obama care, and how do I sign up for that?' " said Carrie McLean, a licensed agent for eHealthInsurance.com. The California-based company sells coverage from 185 health insurance carriers in 50 states.

McLean said the call center had been inundated by uninsured consumers who were hoping that the overhaul would translate into instant, affordable coverage. That widespread misconception may have originated in part from distorted rhetoric about the legislation bubbling up from the hyper-partisan debate about it in Washington and some media outlets, such as when opponents denounced it as socialism.

So who is to blame for all the confusion? Simple answer – everyone.

First we have the Republicans, who spent the last year lying about health care reform. They made it sound like it was going to be free care for all, similar to Canada or the UK.

Then we have the media, who acted as a vehicle for these lies. They constantly let them go unchallenged.

Finally we have the Democrats, who didn’t organize a strong enough media presence to counter the lies.

So everyone is guilty. Welcome to the mess that is U.S. politics.

My Views On The IPad

Posted 4/5/10 at 11:47am by jamie

A lot of people are saying that the IPad will change the way we access the internet. After 15 years of web development and over a quarter century of software development, all I can say is “here we go again”.

Apple has put some amazing technology into the IPad, but overall it is still a tablet – a device that has been out for over a decade. The IPad is also lacking on some key features, like the ability to display Flash objects. That is going to be one of the biggest killers, especially with similar devices, like Microsoft’s Courier and HP’s Slate, supporting the technology that has turned the web into a media streaming device.

Flash has always been in the middle of a war when it comes to the internet. The code behind web sites, HTML, has a new standard making its way into browsers – HTML5. HTML5 supports embedding videos without the need for the third party Flash. A lot of people are seeing that it will kill Flash, but again that is something I’ve heard before. Flash offers features the HTML5 doesn’t, or aren’t so easy to put in. One of those is delivering video ads, known as pre-rolls. There are ways the pre-rolls can be added into HTML5, but it is rather clunky and still not as feature rich as the Flash alternative, and pre-roll ads are a big money getter for network video sites such as Hulu and MSNBC.

Then there is the fact that Apple loves to stay tethered to AT&T. This first wave of IPads won’t notice it because they can only connect via WiFi, but the next ones coming out will have 3G support, but that’s only if you live in an area served by AT&T. I know the area I live in doesn’t have AT&T coverage, and that’s with a rather large university down the road. Even if you do have good AT&T coverage, who wants to fork out the $30 a month for the device that doesn’t even make phone calls?

How Unprecedented Are Mandates?

Posted 3/29/10 at 9:22am by jamie

This unprecedented:

In July, 1798, Congress passed, and President John Adams signed into law "An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen," authorizing the creation of a marine hospital service, and mandating privately employed sailors to purchase healthcare insurance.

This legislation also created America's first payroll tax, as a ship's owner was required to deduct 20 cents from each sailor's monthly pay and forward those receipts to the service, which in turn provided injured sailors hospital care. Failure to pay or account properly was discouraged by requiring a law violating owner or ship's captain to pay a 100 dollar fine.

So unprecedented that they were only enacted by the 2nd President of the United States. I guess all those AGs suing over the “constitutionality” of the mandate didn’t really do their homework.

Adding….I  think we can also safely assume that the Texas Board of Education will be meeting this week to remove John Adams from the history books also.

How “Big Government” Can Keep Health Care Prices Low

Posted 3/25/10 at 11:54am by jamie

It’s funny how the Republicans always say “big government isn’t the solution”, but there is a very real scenario to look at in this nation that proves just the opposite:

While health care reformers argue about what it would take to “break the curve” of health care inflation, the state of Maryland has done it, at least when it comes to hospital spending.

In 1977, Maryland decided that, rather than leaving prices to the vagaries of a marketplace where insurers and hospitals negotiate behind closed doors, it would delegate the task of setting reimbursement rates for acute-care hospitals to an independent agency, the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission.

When setting rates, the Commission takes into account differences in labor markets and how much a hospital pays in wages; the amount of charity care the hospital does; and whether it treats a large number of severely ill patients. For example, the Commission sets the price of an overnight stay at St. Joseph Medical Center in suburban Towson  at $984,  while letting  Johns Hopkins, in Baltimore Maryland, charge  $1,555. For a basic chest X-ray, St. Joseph's asks  $81 and Hopkins' is allowd to  charge  $155. The differences reflect Hopkins's higher costs as a teaching hospital and the fact that it cares for generally sicker patients.

The private sector doesn’t set health care prices in Maryland, the state does. What has that meant for price? Well check out this graph:

Back To The House

Posted 3/25/10 at 8:04am by jamie

The reconciliation bill will be heading back to the House for another vote:

Senate Republicans succeeded early Thursday morning in finding two flaws in the House-passed health care reconciliation package. Neither is of any substance, but the Senate parliamentarian informed Democratic leaders that both are in violation of the Byrd Rule.

One is related to Pell Grants and the other makes small technical corrections. Why they're in violation of the Byrd Rule doesn't matter; the upshot is that Republicans will succeed in at least slightly altering the legislation, which means that the House is once again required to vote on it. With no substantial changes, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) should have little problem assembling the same coalition of 220 Democrats who passed the measure Sunday night. That's already four more than the minimum 216 required for passage.

No biggie. The only problem I see is that it gives Republicans in the House another chance to take to the floor and try to incite the dangerous backlash from their followers we have been seeing.

But I do wonder how many left wing blogs will accuse the parliamentarian of being some right wing plant over this. My guess is none, unlike the Republicans who attacked him for making decisions they didn’t like.

More On That Gallup Poll

Posted 3/24/10 at 8:43am by jamie

I’ve been reading more on that Gallup poll from yesterday that shows more Americans now supporting health care reform than opposing it. For a refresher, here’s the results:

gphcr

What’s interesting is the headline accompanying this poll:

By Slim Margin, Americans Support Healthcare Bill's Passage

I don’t really remember pollsters considering a 9% margin “slim”. Perhaps all the talk of the “60% majority” of the Senate has confused the people at Gallup.

Then we have those on the right trying to spin this away. For example, here is Allahpundit:

And so it came to be, after a day’s worth of nonstop coverage of History!, that ObamaCare’s gotten a bounce.

What is really interesting here is when you look back at recent history. In the heat of last summer, during those viral townhall meetings, we saw support for health care reform plummet. There was 24/7 news coverage of the yelling and screaming, but if you ask anyone on the right that coverage had nothing to do with the wavering support. Sorry guys but you can’t have it both ways here.

Pages

Comments



blog advertising is good for you

Tip Jar

Follow Me On Twitter


Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter:
Follow IntoxiNation on Twitter